Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Huh? I never said Nelly Custis-Lewis didn't live with the Washington's In fact, I said that she DID live with them. However, she lived with them during yer younger years, when GW was a plantation farmer, and a wealthy one at that. She did not live with them during GW's service as President.Originally posted by TexasSky:
*Sigh* Apparently a LOT of historians disagree with you regarding whether or not Nelly lived with him or not.
The Washington Prayer Book was not Washington's. That's a historical fact. Check with the National Archives, the Library of Congress, and the Smithsonian Institute. This is not a matter of opinion. This is a matter of fact.Originally posted by TexasSky:
I believe that John's history is flawed, and I believe that the quotes attributed to Washington in regards to Christ are indeed Washington's, and I believe that the testimony of the child he raised testify to that.
Originally posted by TexasSky:
... what difference does WHEN she lived with him make in regards to whether or not she had reason to believe he was a Christian?
He FOUNDED churches that preached the gospel of Christ.
The child he raised said that it was as wrong to question his Christianity as it was to question his patrotism. Why isn't that enough for you?
How do you, or anyone else, know he never spoke up for Christ?
George H Bush has never made a public profession of faith. However, George W Bush has. GW Bush's Christian faith is indesputable.I know for a FACT that George H. Bush is a professing Christian because I had the opportunity to discuss Christ with him, but you won't find many quotes from him about that - NOT because he didn't speak up, but because history didn't record it.
Feel free to do some internet searching to find support for its authenticity. You'll find it to be quite lacking.Originally posted by TexasSky:
I don't believe it IS in error. I did a websearch. I find absolutely NOTHING that is NOT from a athiest run sight
http://personal.pitnet.net/primarysources/george.htmlBut, O God, who art rich in mercy and plenteous in redemption, mark not, I beseech thee, what I have done amiss; remember that i am but dust, and remit my transgressions, negligences & ignorances, and cover them all with the absolute obedience of thy dear Son, that those sacrifices which I have offered may be accepted by thee, in and for the sacrifice of Jesus Christ offered upon the cross for me; for his sake, ease me of the burden of my sins, and give me grace that by the call of the Gospel I may rise from the slumber of sin into the newness of life.
The prayer journal in question was also found not that be in Washington's handwriting long before Barton was born. Yet Barton claims that the prayer book was written in Washington's own hand. In short, Barton is promoting a falsehood, yet again. In an attempt to fight off revisionist history, he himself is revising history. Sorry, but two wrongs don't make a right. The man's a liar. You can esteem him all you wish. He's stil a liar.Originally posted by LadyEagle:
From George Washington's Prayer Journal (Published in 1919 - nearly 100 years ago, before revisionist history got a stronghold & please note - This was long before David Barton was born)