• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

GES New Assault on "the Christ"

Lou Martuneac said:
“Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him. Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit,” (Proverbs 26:4-5).

To Lurkers:

Verse 4 is why I don't acknowledge or respond to the outbursts from those who are struggling with the exposure of the LS errors in the writings of MacArthur.

H. A. Ironside in commenting on verse 4 wrote, Therefore, by “answering not,” I avoid becoming like him/them.

In regard to verse 5 Ironside wrote,
Verse 5 is what you will find is the purpose of my articles on the Lordship Salvation errors on the Gospel of Jesus Christ.


LM

PS: That is my last word on the LS issue in this thread. More “folly” will be what others may wish to continue posting in this thread.

See? You are getting emotional and now calling other brothers in Christ a fool. What can I say? And yet you give this scripture as if to say you "answer not!"
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
Lou Martuneac said:
To All:

Even though some have been deceived by the teachings of Lordship Salvation the incontrovertible evidence of Lordship Salvaton’s non-saving message that frustrates grace are plentiful for any objective reader
Here are two, of many, examples of the Lordship departure from orthodoxy:.
To All: If you go to Lou's blog, you will get distortion instead of the truth. If you want the truth of what J.Mac teaches, go directly to his website. I have been there. I have posted what he teaches directly beside what Lou claims he teaches. There is no denying that what Lou Martuneac claims John MacArthur teaches is untrue. Go see for yourselves.

http://www.gty.org/Resources/Articles/2439
It is sad that some let their passions, admiration and love for certain personalities cloud their judgment. They place the premium on allegiance to friends more so than fidelity to the Word of God.
My allegience is to Christ and to the truth found in God's Word. Nothing has clouded my judgment, not even Lou Martuneac's continuing distortion of the teachings of John MacArthur.
I trust we won’t have any more emotional outbursts over LS that put off-track this thread when I was trying to point out a current debate over Hodges’s “Crossless” gospel.
If you won't make outrageous (and completely untrue) comments about John MacArthur in this thread, then I would not feel obligated to point out your distortions.
Anyone who wants to debate the merits of Lordship Salvation is invited to do so at my blog. There are well over 50 articles that address the non-saving LS message that frustrates grace (Gal. 2:20).
Anyone who goes to Lou's blog expecting to find the truth about what John MacArthur teaches about Lordship Salvation will be misled.

Lou is debating himself on his blog, because what he is debating is an abiration of the truth of his own making.

If you want to know what John MacArthur teaches concerning Lordship Salvation, go to his website:

http://www.gty.org/Resources/Articles/2439

peace to you:praying:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Rippon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
More Foolishness

The following verses are from the book of Proverbs .

10:18 : Hiding hatred makes you a liar ; slandering others makes you a fool .

10:23 : Doing wrong is fun for a fool , but living wisely brings pleasure to the sensible .

18:2 : Fools have no interest in understanding ; they only want to air their own opinions .

Ecclesiastes 10:12-14a : Wise words bring approval , but fools are destroyed by their own words . Fools base their thoughts on foolish assumptions , so their conclusions will be wicked madness ; they chatter on and on .

( All Scripture is from the NLTse )
 

canadyjd

Well-Known Member
Lou Martuneac said:
“Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him. Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit,” (Proverbs 26:4-5).




H. A. Ironside in commenting on verse 4 wrote, Therefore, by “answering not,” I avoid becoming like him/them.

In regard to verse 5 Ironside wrote,
Verse 5 is what you will find is the purpose of my articles on the Lordship Salvation errors on the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

PS: That is my last word on the LS issue in this thread. More “folly” will be what others may wish to continue posting in this thread.
And therefore I must apologize "to all" for my continual attempt to answer Lou Martuneac's laughable assertions by quoting directly from John MacArthur himself, comparing those assertions with what J.Mac actually teaches, and patiently answering every question Lou had; In addition, I did in-depth analysis of James, answering all of Lou's questions directly, to which Lou never responded to.

In all that wasted time, all Lou has said was "you don't understand" or "your liking John Mac has clouded your judgment" or "just go to my website and I'll explain it all to you".

Personally, I would rather you didn't respond to anything I posted, as I don't respect you or your judgment.

As far as being emotional, let me be clear to you.

I intend not to let you breathe a single untruth about John MacArthur on this board without pointing out your distortions and untruths; as well as pointing those who do read the threads directly to J.Mac's website so they can compare what you claim he teaches to what he actually teaches.

You have been exposed, sir. I intend to keep the light of truth on you.

peace to you:praying:
 

Lou Martuneac

New Member
Our Subject Matter

To All:

I did not want to open a new thread, so I placed this here...

For quite some time I have posted several threads and comments here at BB about the teaching of Zane Hodges and Bob Wilkin commonly known as the “Crossless” gospel.

This position is as radical a departure from a balanced biblical position on the Gospel as you will find in any evangelical circles. The “Crossless” gospel is as far from biblical orthodoxy at its end of the theological pendulum swing as John MacArthur's Lordship Salvation is from its end.

At my blog there is a new series under way. The title is, The Technical Meaning of the Term, “THE GOSPEL.”

Furthermore, I posted an article titled, Is the “Crossless” Label the Right Label? That article defines why “Crossless” is the appropriate designation for the Hodges view of the Gospel. An excellent thread developed under that article.


LM
 

Jarthur001

Active Member
Lou Martuneac said:
To All:

I did not want to open a new thread, so I placed this here...

For quite some time I have posted several threads and comments here at BB about the teaching of Zane Hodges and Bob Wilkin commonly known as the “Crossless” gospel.

This position is as radical a departure from a balanced biblical position on the Gospel as you will find in any evangelical circles. The “Crossless” gospel is as far from biblical orthodoxy at its end of the theological pendulum swing as John MacArthur's Lordship Salvation is from its end.

At my blog there is a new series under way. The title is, The Technical Meaning of the Term, “THE GOSPEL.”

Furthermore, I posted an article titled, Is the “Crossless” Label the Right Label? That article defines why “Crossless” is the appropriate designation for the Hodges view of the Gospel. An excellent thread developed under that article.


LM

LM,

How can I trust anything you say about Hodges, when you have shown to distort others?

Another thing...

You keep saying..

commonly known as the “Crossless” gospel.

The only place I have seen this is on your site. Who else uses this?
 
Top