GIANT RED WAVE COMING!

[Revmitchell]

And it's clear you haven't even reviewed the Senate Intelligence Committee Report (Volume 5). You are a stubborn one.

Trump didn’t collude with Russia to get elected, Senate panel belatedly concludes

took the committee three years to figure out the obvious. Its report released Tuesday said there is “absolutely no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 election.”.....

......year-and-a-half ago, the report by then-Special Counsel Robert Mueller found no collusion conspiracy. Two-and-a-half years ago, the House Intelligence Committee (the so-called “Nunes Memo”) reached the same conclusion.
.....The new Senate report reiterates old truths. That is, Comey’s FBI deceived the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) to gain an unlawful warrant to spy on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. The bureau knew that Steele was unreliable and biased. It knew that the dossier was unverified and not remotely credible. The FBI knew the dossier was conjured up and commissioned by Trump’s political opponents.


Trump didn’t collude with Russia to get elected, Senate panel belatedly concludes - Gregg Jarrett

 

[Benjamin]

I’m going to drop off my vote and a few for family members tomorrow in the ballot box at the polling station here in Arizona. Trump did 2 rallies here today and the enthusiasm was off the charts and I couldn’t believe the size of the crowds, especially in Bullhead City! BTW, my 24YO son is up in Bullhead City working his new mining job operating a brand new 1 1/2 Million $ drilling machine making 80k+ a year. GIANT RED WAVE COMING!

 

[Baptist Believer]

Trump didn’t collude with Russia to get elected, Senate panel belatedly concludes - Gregg Jarrett

Intelligent people actually read documents instead of just reading the spin. Trump supporters don’t like to read, they like to be told what to think.

 

[Revmitchell]

Intelligent people actually read documents instead of just reading the spin. Trump supporters don’t like to read, they like to be told what to think.

You got more spin than a hurricane. Not a sincere bone in your body

 

[canadyjd]

We have around 330 million people in the United States. If we assume that just 1% of the population would be zealously interested in going to see Trump in person, that's 3.3 million people. That's a larger fan base than many bands that toured the US in better times. Given that political rallies are free to attend, and rallies tend to take place near population centers, it is relatively easy to fill up an arena if you are a celebrity and you provide a free spectacle.

So don't take crowd sizes at rallies as a measure of popularity among voters, especially when there is one side that is willing to "prove" COVID-19 is a hoax, and the other side uses common sense and has a candidate that avoids holding similar events.

"I saw a story where up to 40% of mail-in ballots will be disqualified and not counted because signatures don’t match or the forms are not completed correctly."
That's speculation at this point. There has been a strong effort to educate voters on the mail-in voting procedures to prevent disqualified ballots.


I've never heard the claim you are making. I've heard the PRESIDENT claim, without evidence, that 3 million people cast votes illegally for Clinton, but I have heard no prominent Democrat claim Trump stole the election. I haven't even heard a loony Democrat claim such a thing, but I'm sure that's possible -- somewhere.

"As far as the rest of the dem propaganda against POT:S that you regurgitated in your post; you have made the same mistake they have been making for years,,, they believe their own made up nonsense..."
I get my information from court documents, sworn statements, testimony, and my own viewing of the President's speeches. I haven't been proven wrong yet.


I hope so. And when the American people vote Trump and many Republicans out of office, will you accept the verdict?

First: “Crowd size doesn’t equal popularity” is the same argument dems/Hill:ry made in 2016. They were wrong then and now.

Second: “one side is willing to ‘prove’ Covid-19 is a hoax”: Are you accusing POT:S of claiming this virus is a “hoax”? The man who shut down travel to China/Europe, saving hundreds of thousands of lives (that number coming from the experts)? While dems called him racist and accused him of over-reacting?

The man who used the full weight of his administration to demand manufacturers re-tool their factories to produce PPE, ventilators and other needed equipment? Who used Amry Corps to build a hospital in New York that was never used but the dem governor sent Covid positive elderly back into nursing homes killing thousands?

The man who followed the advice of the “experts” (according to Fauci) even when they gave conflicting statements (use a mask, don’t use a mask, the mask will save more lives than a vaccine, well, not really because a mask doesn’t really stop you from exposure but probably lessens severity of the exposure)

The man who cut through the bureaucratic nightmare and fast tracked treatments and vaccines months and years ahead of the usual process.

There is much more proof of decisive action by POT:S. Will you give him credit for anything, or will you regurgitate dem propaganda that he doesn’t care and has done nothing?

Will you accept POT:S victory, or will you continue to parrot dem talking points.

peace to you

 

[kyredneck]

When I step out of my circle and just observe and listen I'm seeing on average like 7-8 out of 10 either committed to or leaning toward Trump.

Great news from AZ.

Don Surber says of the Senate elections that every state that Trump wins the Republican candidate will win. Great news for McSally if so.

 

[kyredneck]

Intelligent people actually read documents instead of just reading the spin. Trump supporters don’t like to read, they like to be told what to think.

There was a time when I considered you to be intelligent.

 

[Revmitchell]

Besides completing the great job of eliminating the threat from COVID-19 I look forward to America to continue being put first and a serious upswing in our economy. As a bonus, the soon to come prosecution of those in the deep state who attempted a treasonous coup and continued draining of the swamp, teaching our children to be proud of respect our country and the SCOTUS being on track this should come to a wonderful lasting change. Along with regaining the House I have very high hopes for the future of our country.

Pelosi on Wednesday: ‘Now We’re in Worse Shape;’ GDP on Thursday: +33.1%

 

[Revmitchell]

There was a time when I considered you to be intelligent.

Id give him a break. It was a momentary emotional response. Wait....never mind anything related to Trump seems to be that for him so there goes my theory.

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

Intelligent people actually read documents instead of just reading the spin. Trump supporters don’t like to read, they like to be told what to think.

Reading is one thing, reading with comprehension quite another.

For example, I read the article you posted regarding the supposed inaccurate filings for Flynn’s case. Per that article, the FBI made the errors and forced them into the documentation. This was not the first time the FBI has screwed around with information regarding these investigations.

"In response to the Court and counsel’s questions, the government has learned that, during the review of the Strzok notes, FBI agents assigned to the EDMO review placed a single yellow sticky note on each page of the Strzok notes with estimated dates (the notes themselves are undated)," Jocelyn Ballantine, a DOJ attorney, wrote in a court filing.

"Those two sticky notes were inadvertently not removed when the notes were scanned by FBI Headquarters, before they were forwarded to our office for production," Ballantine added. "The government has also confirmed with Mr. Goelman and can represent that the content of the notes was not otherwise altered."

Highlighting added.​

 

[canadyjd]

.....
Simply put, Biden is not Trump. That's the beginning and the end of it for most people who are going to vote for him.......

Probably true. But not a resounding endorsement of the man or his platform.

I guess it depends on how many have such an irrational hatred of POT:S and whether that motivates them to vote. I suspect the % of those who think like this isn’t very large.

So the election is contrasted by hate vs hope; by a “Winter of darkness” vs “We are rounding the curve with vaccines and treatments” ; by “We can learn to live with this virus by opening up the economy with proper precautions” vs “ We must learn to die with this virus by total shutdowns and mandatory mask wearing”

I expect people to chose hope over hate, optimism over pessimism, opening up vs shutting down...

POT:S over Bid:n

peace to you

 

[Reynolds]

Intelligent people actually read documents instead of just reading the spin. Trump supporters don’t like to read, they like to be told what to think.

No that's Democrats you are talking about. Particularly Democrats still on the Plantation

 

[Wingman68]

This is great, had to share! There will never be another like DJT. Tell me this doesn’t put a smile on your face, heh.

 

[Reynolds]

No closet. I've been happy not to have been a part of this board for a while. Been dealing with some important issues with family and local crime.


You actually DON'T know that, that's just the opinion you've inherited from whatever propagandist you're currently listening to at the moment. The Republican-controlled (but bipartisan) Senate Intelligence Committee Report on Russian Interference in the 2016 Election (Volume 5) lays out extensive evidence of collusion between the Trump Campaign (including Trump himself) and Wikileaks (through Roger Stone), with the Trump campaign knowing of the public reporting and intelligence assessments that the Wikileak information was coming from Russia. And there's a LOT more, but I'm sure you have either not heard about that because of your media habits, or you don't want to know about it.


I have been proven right in many assertions, and never proven wrong. There will be much more to come when the President loses his immunity. That's when you will be able to make an honest evaluation of my reliability in these matters.


I don't need or want your permission.

Trump does opposition research using WikiLeaks.
Hillary paid Russian operatives directly.
Cry me a river.

 

[canadyjd]

This is great, had to share! There will never be another like DJT. Tell me this doesn’t put a smile on your face, heh.

Oh my goodness, so funny!!!!

I love it when campaigns use humor.

peace to you

 

[RighteousnessTemperance&]

I'm voting for the rule of law... and that's voting Trump and Bill Barr out of office.

That sentiment is inane. It is patently false that Trump and Barr do not uphold the rule of law. But even if the premise were true, it does not follow that replacing them with Dems could correct the problem. It could only make it far worse. The main problem is the Dems.

 

[777]

Intelligent people actually read documents instead of just reading the spin. Trump supporters don’t like to read, they like to be told what to think.

Did you read the document YOU linked to? You said this:

The Republican-controlled (but bipartisan) Senate Intelligence Committee Report on Russian Interference in the 2016 Election (Volume 5) lays out extensive evidence of collusion between the Trump Campaign (including Trump himself) and Wikileaks (through Roger Stone), with the Trump campaign knowing of the public reporting and intelligence assessments that the Wikileak information was coming from Russia

Yet the report said this:

As is evident to those who read all five volumes of the Committee's report, the Russian government inappropriately meddled in our 2016 general election in many ways but then-Candidate Trump was not complicit. After more than three years of investigation by this Committee, we can now say with no doubt, there was no collusion.

(waiting on pins and needles to be told what to think)

 

[Benjamin]

Biden is not doing big rallies because they are dangerous to the health and well-being of the nation.

No, try to wrap your head around this simple and revealing truth, ...Biden is not doing big rallies because nobody shows up.

 

[Benjamin]

The likeliest scenario is that Trump will have a slight numerical advantage on election night, with enormous numbers of votes uncounted. It will take a few weeks to get a clearer picture of the vote.

We all know this scheme is the hope of the Left to manufacture "uncounted" votes and steal the election but I think it more likely to be an obvious Trump Red Wave win on election night.

I look forward to liberal tears flowing into my America First cup after this election.

 

[Benjamin]

A Tale of Two Campaigns: Biden Rallies vs. Trump Rallies