</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Askjo:
Originally posted by DesiderioDomini:
[qb] I like James White, I enjoy his lectures, his book was very informative to me, and his book educated me very well on this issue.
That is why you listen to this man because I realized that he is anti-KJV man. I read his book and found his book is misinformative. I do not think he is scholarly. I learned that one man confronted him and asked him some questions, but James was incapable to answer to him.
</font>
Askjo, I have seen you do this before. You claim something, and provide nothing to support it. Can I not also claim that I know you beat your wife? Should I be allowed to discredit you simply on my word? OF COURSE NOT! That would be unfair, and dishonest.
Now, to clarify, I do like White's book, because I feel that he gives the INFORMATION and lets you make up your own mind. He doesnt just say "The KJV is wrong", but he engages is debate and discussion to explain WHY he believes the KJV is wrong in some places.
Who were these people who stumped him, and what were the questions? I am not asking to defend him, but rather to make sure the questions get answered! I couldn't care less about his reputation here, but if you have a question that has yet to be answered, post it here and I will do the research. Otherwise, if you are not able to produce these questions nor their originator, then it is clear that this situation is a fabrication or exaggeration.
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> Here lies my main problem with the majority of KJVO...MANY of them have never sought out the evidence to see if these author are telling the truth
KJVO posters do not have to provide you some evidences because they know that MV supporters including you pointed off answers. I read your posts in other website, but I did not see you directly and straightly answer to KJVO posters' questions there. </font>[/QUOTE]Interesting, as I have never seen anyone complain of this. Only thing I can think of is the normal KJVO MO, which is to ignore a question, and instead demand an answer for their question. I have ignored many questions in that context. However, if you feel there are any important questions that have been addressed to me that I have ignored, post them, and I will directly address them immediately. Can you say the same? If so, then read on.....
Back to the subject, I have asked you before, and so have others, to explain how the KJV is perfect when there have been the vast number of changes listed here by Logos and many others.
If the KJV was perfect, then why was there a need for ANY KIND of revision? Why did God allow errors in either the printing, or just simple mistakes by the KJV translators, or mistakes by the later editors of the current KJVs?
Also, you say "The KJV isnt perfect, but the KJB is".
Please explain the difference between the KJV and the KJB, and why one has errors and one doesnt.