Originally posted by music4Him:
It seems to me that my theology isn't the one getting offended here. I'm also not the one that is flustrated and being ugly to others. To me your question was a 2 part question(trickery),and I chose to answer it with logic.
Why not let others come in and see for themselfs and see what they think?
"If" I said No to your question, then that to me would be as bad as saying that God didn't heal and we all know that it is God that heals and He has always been the one to heal.
Now do you understand how I am reading your question?
Music4Him
I'll make it simple for you. Here is what the Scripture says:
Acts 5:16 There came also a multitude out of the cities round about unto Jerusalem, bringing sick folks, and them which were vexed with unclean spirits: and
they were healed every one.
Consider the above verse and the way that people were healed. Now the question. Does God heal today in the same way that he did in the Apostolic Age, where they healed all that came to them.
Does he? If yes, provide evidence of any individual that has the power of God to heal all that comes to him. That is a very simple request, a simple question asking a yes or no answer, and if yes to verify your answer. It is not hard.
Now I will answer it for you since you refuse to do so.
No, absoulutely not. God does not heal today as he did in the first century, such that all that come to any "faith healer" will be healed. If he did operate in such a way you would immediately provide the evidence instead of making this a two part question, and playing such silly word games. It is either yes or no, and the answer is no--he does not heal in the same manner. He heals, but not in the same manner as he did with the apostles in the New Testament. Now that is not such a hard admission to make, is it?
But it does destroy your theology. It demonstrates that the gift of healing has ceased. It is that one solitary fact that you and Tam refuse to come to grips with.
DHK