Hebrews 10:23

[Dr. Bob]

Will: "The only Book I defend as the inerrant words of God is the English text of the Authorized King James Holy Bible."

Now Will, that is truly tragic. I commend your honesty in proclaiming your position, but that is blasphemy against what GOD said.

You are saying that you do not believe/defend MY Bible (Greek/Hebrew) as the inspired Word of God?

If I've misunderstood you, let me know. If it IS what you are saying, we need to find an "Other Religion" title for that belief, because it certainly is not "Baptist"!

 

[skanwmatos]

Originally posted by Will J. Kinney:
You, on the other hand, are just another bible rummager who places your own mind as the final authority.

Just come out and admit it.

Why would I admit to your lie? The bible is my final authority. However, unlike you, I don't make up lies about my final authority. I don't have to.

 

[Orvie]

Originally posted by skanwmatos:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Will J. Kinney:
You, on the other hand, are just another bible rummager who places your own mind as the final authority.

Just come out and admit it.

Why would I admit to your lie? The bible is my final authority. However, unlike you, I don't make up lies about my final authority. I don't have to. </font>[/QUOTE]Hi Skan, Mr K called me "Bible Rummager" too In 1610, all "Christians" appear to have been "Bible Rummagers" unless they were Geneva Onlies

I responded to our dear brother by calling him a "Bible Facist", since he believes God has pickled His Word for the English speaking world in the KJV.

 

[HankD]

The only Book I defend as the inerrant words of God is the English text of the Authorized King James Holy Bible. You, on the other hand, are just another bible rummager who places your own mind as the final authority

There you go again.

Will, you do all this research and then spoil it all with your accusations.

even if you are 100% correct concerning what you are showing us what about...

James 3
17 But the wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be intreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without partiality, and without hypocrisy.
18 And the fruit of righteousness is sown in peace of them that make peace.

Will why not just show your evidence and then leave it at that instead of ending on an inflammatory note?

HankD

 

[Precepts]

So, Hank why can't you respond to the discussions instead you look for any little tidbit to twist into a slurr or an accustaion because you just don't like the facts. Brother Will is right and his "label" for Skan fits him to a "T".

Dr. Bob is also nit-picking on what most certainly looks like the mistake of Brother Will on the use of the verb "is" when "maybe" he meant "in', but we will all wait for Brother Will's reply.

God Bless you Brohter Hank for you observation.

 

[Dr. Bob]

I take a man at his word. Are you Will's pr man? Don't think he'd really want that.

BTW it should be noted by all, I don't believe habitual liars who have proven themselves untrustworthy.

 

[Precepts]

And your case is?

 

[skanwmatos]

Originally posted by Precepts:
Brother Will is right and his "label" for Skan fits him to a "T".

Both you and Will are liars. I am a KJV bible believer. I just don't lie about other versions.

 

[Orvie]

Originally posted by Precepts:
So, Hank why can't you respond to the discussions instead you look for any little tidbit to twist into a slurr or an accustaion because you just don't like the facts. Brother Will is right and his "label" for Skan fits him to a "T".

Dr. Bob is also nit-picking on what most certainly looks like the mistake of Brother Will on the use of the verb "is" when "maybe" he meant "in', but we will all wait for Brother Will's reply.

God Bless you Brohter Hank for you observation.

blah, blah, blah, blah....

 

[Orvie]

Originally posted by skanwmatos:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Precepts:
Brother Will is right and his "label" for Skan fits him to a "T".

Both you and Will are liars. I am a KJV bible believer. I just don't lie about other versions. </font>[/QUOTE]Skanwmatos, I've disagreed w/ you on alot of things, but you are honest and consistent.

 

[Orvie]

Originally posted by Precepts:
And your case is?

The verdict is in Pre- U R "guilty of faulty logic as charged"

 

[HankD]

So, Hank why can't you respond to the discussions instead you look for any little tidbit to twist into a slurr or an accustaion because you just don't like the facts.

Because for the most part I agree with Brother Will and had you taken the time to read my posts to him instead of the usual rush to judgment you would have known that.

Unlike yourself Will does substantive research. If he would simply stop with the accusations at the end of his work it would probably produce some fruit.

I will say one more thing about Will, he doesn't follow up a brotherly rebuke with paranoid sniveling and whinning about being attacked by people who are only defending themselves.

HankD

 

[Orvie]

Originally posted by HankD:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />So, Hank why can't you respond to the discussions instead you look for any little tidbit to twist into a slurr or an accustaion because you just don't like the facts.

Because for the most part I agree with Brother Will and had you taken the time to read my posts to him instead of the usual rush to judgment you would have known that.

Unlike yourself Will does substantive research. If he would simply stop with the accusations at the end of his work it would probably produce some fruit.

I will say one more thing about Will, he doesn't follow up a brotherly rebuke with paranoid sniveling and whinning about being attacked by people who are only defending themselves.

HankD </font>[/QUOTE]I've disagreed w/ Will on most things b/c he's a Bible Facist....but he does "substantive research"...however the other KJVO:kjbo you spoke of is paranoid and always whines about what he himself does to others. Bluntly it's called hypocrisy

 

[Precepts]

Originally posted by HankD:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />So, Hank why can't you respond to the discussions instead you look for any little tidbit to twist into a slurr or an accustaion because you just don't like the facts.

Because for the most part I agree with Brother Will and had you taken the time to read my posts to him instead of the usual rush to judgment you would have known that.

Unlike yourself Will does substantive research. If he would simply stop with the accusations at the end of his work it would probably produce some fruit.

I will say one more thing about Will, he doesn't follow up a brotherly rebuke with paranoid sniveling and whinning about being attacked by people who are only defending themselves.

HankD </font>[/QUOTE]So why did you then?

 

[Precepts]

Originally posted by skanwmatos:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Precepts:
Brother Will is right and his "label" for Skan fits him to a "T".

Both you and Will are liars. I am a KJV bible believer. I just don't lie about other versions. </font>[/QUOTE]Glad to see you admit to being a liar too, then. Now if all will concur, we can get over this and get to discussing the question.

I don't have to "rummage" other versions to understand the Will of the Lord and His Word, sorry, I'm God's "PR" man, and I just agree with Brother Will. There. Is that "offensive" enough?

Hankd, I've done the research, you're demanding I post it, I will only continue to post the understanding of the research, if you continue to demand the evidences of my research, you will left standing there with your finger pointing, you choose, my Brother, you choose.

I do wonder, does it require "faith" to maintain "hope"? Hmmm? Let's consider before demanding the Greek be so limited: hope can be dashed to pieces, faith can only be belittled, nut when one turns to the Lord Who is Faithful and True, there is no need for simple hope, but growing FAITH!

Praise the Lord for increasing our faith, and keeping us from a false hope! Halelujah!

Yall don't mind if I praise the Lord for FAITH do ya? I wonder how those will take this and turn it into an attack? Hmmm?

 

[Orvie]

Pre- you should stop correcting the Bible of Hebrews 10:23 elpis using the English. You, Will K, The AV translators, Noah Webster are in error here, while God is right, by chosing Paul(?)to use this word instead of pistis.

 

[Dr. Bob]

Orvie - if the premise is that the AV can NEVER BE WRONG (and that, certainly, is the "only" view) then correcting the Greek is the logical step.

We have one "only" pastor who is rewriting the Greek text in an interlinear NT to conform to the structure and word order of the AV.

The fires of hell are not hot enough for doing such damage to the precious Word of God . .

 

[Precepts]

The Word of God is preserved in thought that just so happens to be preserved in the KJB. You accuse us of worshipping the English of the KJB and the Bible itself, all the while you maintain a worship of the Greek which is nothing more than a language of men. Now we see Dr. Bob perfectly portraying the mindset of a cardinal belching hellfire to some one and their efforts to relate the true thought of God verses the thought of man.

Let God be true and every man a liar.

God Bless

 

[Precepts]

So why then do yall try to correct God with GreeK?

 

[Dr. Bob]

Originally posted by Precepts:
Now we see Dr. Bob perfectly portraying the mindset of a cardinal belching hellfire to some one and their efforts to relate the true thought of God verses the thought of man.

I LIKE that analogy, Precepts. Belching hellfire. Reminds me of eating dinner at Poncho's Mexican Buffet . .

And a cardinal . . didn't they have the power to excommunicate? You're laughable, friend. Not funny "ha ha". Sad. Sorry to see you go.

That IS what cardinals do, right?