Apreacher4Him
New Member
Contextual, Grammatical, Literal - AKA Dispensational Theology
Contextual, Grammatical, Literal - AKA Dispensational Theology
Rather than redefine the OP in my own image like so many do...
Let me just say this... I agree!
And more to the point.... I would challenge any to show me one place
Where Literal, Grammatical, Historical and Contextual Interpretation of the Scriptures...
that is, to say, RIGHTLY dividing the Word of Truth does not bring a
consistent hermeneutic that may be thus labeled "dispensational"?
Dwight Pentecost in his Classic "Things to Come" made that point very early in His
work... "Dispensational Theology" does not need to be "systemytized" (sp?)
as such to fit some "mold" like other "historical" systems of interpretation.
Simply because a consistent use of Literal, Grammatical, Historical and Contextual interpretation of the Precious word of God will lead us to the proper distinctions of terms, periods, Blessed Hopes, and future for the Kingdom of God in all its Facets.
"Dispensational Theology" as it is "understood" is simply the "result" not the cause of a proper understanding and interpretation of the Scriptures.
But, start with what is considered "dispensational" lol.... and find one place in Scripture where such a rendering is not found when you interpret the Scripture Literally, Gramatically, Historically, and Contextually... [even so-called dual interpretations in select "prophecies of old time" are only found as one finds the plain sense of Scripture - Comparing Scripture with Scripture as its own best commentary]
God bless.
Contextual, Grammatical, Literal - AKA Dispensational Theology
Rather than redefine the OP in my own image like so many do...
Let me just say this... I agree!
And more to the point.... I would challenge any to show me one place
Where Literal, Grammatical, Historical and Contextual Interpretation of the Scriptures...
that is, to say, RIGHTLY dividing the Word of Truth does not bring a
consistent hermeneutic that may be thus labeled "dispensational"?
Dwight Pentecost in his Classic "Things to Come" made that point very early in His
work... "Dispensational Theology" does not need to be "systemytized" (sp?)
as such to fit some "mold" like other "historical" systems of interpretation.
Simply because a consistent use of Literal, Grammatical, Historical and Contextual interpretation of the Precious word of God will lead us to the proper distinctions of terms, periods, Blessed Hopes, and future for the Kingdom of God in all its Facets.
"Dispensational Theology" as it is "understood" is simply the "result" not the cause of a proper understanding and interpretation of the Scriptures.
But, start with what is considered "dispensational" lol.... and find one place in Scripture where such a rendering is not found when you interpret the Scripture Literally, Gramatically, Historically, and Contextually... [even so-called dual interpretations in select "prophecies of old time" are only found as one finds the plain sense of Scripture - Comparing Scripture with Scripture as its own best commentary]
God bless.
Last edited by a moderator: