Read the Greek scholars expressing the opposite view you posted.What does that even mean????
The Archangel
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Read the Greek scholars expressing the opposite view you posted.What does that even mean????
The Archangel
My response wasn't one of your so-called "taint so" posts. I gave this explanation.... to which you said "taint so..."
In no way did you interact with what I wrote, other than to say "no." You gave no reason or cause that I might be incorrect, other than to suggest that your opinion about a particular word or passage trumps all scholarship to the contrary. So, not only are you being hypocritical in this, you are also demonstrating elements of narcissism.
The Archangel
" In addition not a single usage of tasso in Acts identifies God as being the agent performing the action. In fact of all the instances where tasso is seen throughout the entire N.T. only one explicitly identifies God as being the actor of tasso (e.g. Rom. 13:1), and even in that case the verse is completely unrelated to salvation and simply deals with God setting or establishing authorities in place."
You did not cite "all scholarship" but you have the unmitigated gall, the unabashed temerity to ask me for one?And who is it who says this? Where is the citation?
The Archangel
You did not cite "all scholarship" but you have the unmitigated gall, the unabashed temerity to ask me for one?![]()
This view actually reflects the context and grammar of Acts 13:48.
You said all scholarship, it is incumbent on you to post the evidence as part of posting the unsubstantiated false claim.You posted a quote. It is incumbent on you to post the author as part of posting said quote.
The Archangel
AMAZING!!!! You "establish" your view by referencing the word "grammar," without any discussion thereof. Talks about a "taint so" post!
The Archangel
Please, please provide the quote with the Author. I want to know who said this.And who is it who says this? Where is the citation?
The Archangel
The OP has been thoroughly rebuked with sound Biblical Greek analysis from someone who actually understands Biblical Greek.Yet another post addressing the poster and running from the topic. DUH
The OP has been thoroughly rebuked with sound Biblical Greek analysis from someone who actually understands Biblical Greek.
The OP has acknowledged on prior occasions to having no formal training in Biblical languages, and therefore will only respond with “LOL, “Obfuscation”, “taint so” and “nonsense” when presented with actual evidence of his errors in his understanding of biblical Greek from someone who knows the language.
The OP’s ignorance of Biblical Greek, coupled with an obsession with attempting to alter the established understanding of Biblical Greek to disprove Calvinism, leads the OP to repeated obvious errors in doctrine.
The OP shamelessly attacks any who disagrees with the misinterpreted passages with mocking, personal insults.
The only possible conclusion for any unbiased reader is this thread is another failure, in a long line of failures, to disprove Calvinism from some obsessed with the issue.
peace to you
And the stream of falsehoods continues. The opposition has not presented sound biblical Greek analysis, but only the false assertions of Calvinist partisans.The OP has been thoroughly rebuked with sound Biblical Greek analysis from someone who actually understands Biblical Greek.
SNIP
peace to you
Because the OP is a novice Biblical Greek student, at best, the OP doesn’t recognize sound Biblical Greek analysis when it is presented.And the stream of falsehoods continues. The opposition has not presented sound biblical Greek analysis, but only the false assertions of Calvinist partisans…..