How about when the 2 ever conflict, the scriptures are right?
Deacon said: ↑
Galileo might have problems with that!
How so?
Think about it...
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
How about when the 2 ever conflict, the scriptures are right?
How so?
The bible did not contradict his viewpoints though....
You're comparing two unequal things
A true comparison would be Science and Theology - both are interpretations
Science interprets natural phenomena;
Theology interprets Scripture
Both are man's attempts to understand a work of God,
Both are subject to error and misinterpretation.
I'd place myself in #1 or perhaps #2
Rob
Scripture rightly understood will always agree with science that is true, as both the Bible and creation are revelations of/from God to us!Except that many 'scientists" engage in science with the lens that there is no God and they do not want one. In fact many scientists want the "science" to prove there is no need for God. Science is man made scripture is God made therefore science should be understood and interpreted through the lens of scripture. Find out what scripture says and means first, then view the world and all creation through that lens. Anything else is flawed to the bone.
Scripture rightly understood will always agree with science that is true, as both the Bible and creation are revelations of/from God to us!
I agree , as it is specific revelation from God to us, but nature is still a general revelation, and they would agree with eaxh other!Science and scripture are not on equal footing. Scripture is far superior.
That would mean you would place yourself in agreement with #3Scripture rightly understood will always agree with science that is true, as both the Bible and creation are revelations of/from God to us!
Is that so? Scripture tells us in Genesis 1:1 that "in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." Where does it tell us WHY he did?
You want to know WHY?... all things were created by him, and for him
Those scriptures still don't tell us WHY. A woodworker can build a monstrosity in his backyard; you know he built it by and for himself, but that doesn't tell you why.
OK, here is language that a 10 year old can understand... Because he wanted to...
That was not in question. Or it compares to the Mouseketeers saying they'll see you soon because they like you.
But the corollary is : could he have not created it all without creating a vast majority of humanity to burn in eternal.al torment?
And that would place them in the first category - separate magisteria - with those scientists placing theology in a fictional category.Except that many 'scientists" engage in science with the lens that there is no God and they do not want one. In fact many scientists want the "science" to prove there is no need for God. Science is man made scripture is God made therefore science should be understood and interpreted through the lens of scripture. Find out what scripture says and means first, then view the world and all creation through that lens. Anything else is flawed to the bone.
And that would place them in the first category - separate magisteria - with those scientists placing theology in a fictional category.
Rob
The Bible is not a science book,but when it references something that science now studies the Bible is correct. If science disagrees with The Word, then science is wrong.From the book:
Old Earth or Evolutionary Creation?: Discussing Origins with Reasons to Believe and BioLogos [LINK]
Edited by Kenneth Keathley, J. B. Stump, and Joe Aguirre
How do science and Scripture relate to each other?
Four possible relationships between science and Scripture (could you add another?)
(1) Separate magisteria with science and scripture unrelated to each other, occupying separate spaces;
(2) Complementarity where the two touch, but don’t overlap much;
(3) Fusion with science and Scripture occupying the same space; and
(4) Constructive integration with considerable overlap – but not total.
Where would you place yourself within this structure?
Rob
No, you are right, Scripture does not contradict Galileo's observations that the earth moves and is not the center of the solar system.The bible did not contradict his viewpoints though....
Yeah, as noted the 'Galileo Affair' sort of blew this view out of the water.The Bible is not a science book,but when it references something that science now studies the Bible is correct. If science disagrees with The Word, then science is wrong.
Good theology and good science always reveal truth. There is one truth, approached from many different ways.Four possible relationships between science and Scripture (could you add another?)