SaggyWoman
Active Member
Do you see a lot of results from tracts? I know it is "a" method, but is it as an effective method anymore, as opposed to a good website?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Tracts are no more effective than the person using them.
Some tracts are better than others. We need to remember that being trite and cutting never work with people. I find that (at least for me) personal stories of strong Christians, well done and timely tracts about God's hope for the world are the best. I rarely use them (I prefer to dialogue with someone) but when I do I try to use them to supplement for future reading.
There are some tracts that should never be used. They are insulting and a dangerously trite representation of Christianity.
In a few minutes I will leave this morning to go pick up Habazaki San, and he and I will get out tracts door-to-door. Here in Japan you are allowed to put things in mailboxes. Some years ago Mr. Habazaki got my tract in his mailbox, and wrote me a post card with four Chinese characters meaning, "I want to join your teaching." I visited him and led him to Christ!Do you see a lot of results from tracts? I know it is "a" method, but is it as an effective method anymore, as opposed to a good website?
Very true and well said.Tracts are no more effective than the person using them.
Some tracts are better than others. We need to remember that being trite and cutting never work with people. I find that (at least for me) personal stories of strong Christians, well done and timely tracts about God's hope for the world are the best. I rarely use them (I prefer to dialogue with someone) but when I do I try to use them to supplement for future reading.
There are some tracts that should never be used. They are insulting and a dangerously trite representation of Christianity.
"And a long time ago I heard a Church of Christ preacher on radio talking about one he found placed on his car. He went over the basic info-- "you are not perfect, so you're a sinner in need of salvation"-- "you cannot save yourself"-- "you must have a savior, who is Jesus Christ, the Son of God"-- if you wish to be saved, say this prayer: '........'" You can imagine how he tore into that last part: "Show me one verse of scripture that says you get saved by saying a prayer somebody wrote in a little booklet..."
It is most certainly not a given that tracts are largely ineffective.
Then is it an ungiven that they are smally effective?
Why would tracts be easy-believeism? The doctrine of a tract is no better or worse than that of the person who wrote it. Having said that, I suggest that longer tracts are better, since they can have a more complete discussion of salvation. To me, the first tract of all is the Gospel of John, since it was written specifically for people to believe in Christ.I have heard testimonies of salvations by tracts, so I wouldn't say they are ineffective. However, I am not sold out for them because I am not for easy-believism.
One good thing about a tract is that it opens the door to witness for Christ. I once sat on a train here in Hokkaido next to a Japanese man and offered him a tract, a lengthy one with pictures about the life of Christ. He said, "I'm illiterate." But the very fact that he still took the tract opened the door for me to witness about it's contents. As it turned out, he was a yakuza gangster involved in the "water trade" (a euphemism for a certain wicked business). He didn't trust Christ that day, but I believe the seed was planted.And what about the illiterate?