Bob said If I could persuad you to see your folly in the following, you might turn pro-Christian Sabbath ... "The Gospel writers REVEALED that Jesus rose on "Week day one" (not the Lord's Day) - BECAUSE that is when He rose from the dead. They never state "because in doing so He gave us instruction to keep week day one as the LORD's Day AND as the new Sabbath". But that certianly would be something TO SAY if that was a teaching they had in mind."[/quote]
Try reading the Bible instead of making stuff up.
(How many times would you like me to repeat that?)
Or are you really that frustated that the linguists and translators of all major translations ignore your fantasy?
This last remark of yours:
1. Name them, then 2, Date them. 3, Then test them.
Now here's a discipline I haven't seen researched up to date: KJVisms. Like you get Hebraisms in the Greek of the NT, so KJVisms in the ALLEGED, 'directly from the original' newer 'translations'.
These newer quasi-translations are no translations - they are adaptations to traditional opinion. And they where it is in order for them, simply follow the meaning and even idiom and style of the 'old' KJV - those 'linguists' and 'translators' scarcely if ever looked at the original text - and that for the candid reader is obvious. The Englisg 'translations' specifically are attempts rather at modernising the English - no more.
SO DON'T TRY AND IMPRESS ME WITH HOW MAY "MAJOR TRANSLATIONS" YOU HAVE TO YOUR SUPPORT - they are minor, second-hand and inferior mostly as far as T-R-U-T-H is concerned.