Obviously you don't.Does anyone know what skippy is talking about?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Obviously you don't.Does anyone know what skippy is talking about?
Crossing the $61,000 mark signals the American middle-class may have finally earned more than it did in 1999, although the Census Bureau cautions that median income last year was not statistically different from 1999 or 2007.Oh, oh...Look at what the Washington Post is reporting. Man, it must skin their knees to have to write it.
Middle-class income rose above $61,000 for the first time last year, U.S. Census Bureau says
Middle-class income rose to the highest recorded levels in 2017 and the national poverty rate declined as the benefits of the strong economy lifted the fortunes of more Americans, the U.S. Census reported Wednesday.
The median U.S. household earned $61,372 last year, meaning half of the families in the country brought in more income than this and half earned less.
Crossing the $61,000 mark signals the American middle-class may have finally earned more than it did in 1999, although the Census Bureau cautions that median income last year was not statistically different from 1999 or 2007. A change in methodology in 2013 makes precise comparisons difficult. All the income figures have been adjusted for inflation and are reported in 2017 dollars.
Middle-class household income has been rising steadily in recent years as the economy has rebounded from the deep recession and millions of Americans have found jobs again. The extra pay from having another person in the home working again or working additional hours is the largest factor contributing to rising income.
"We’re continuing to see a shift from part-time to full-time work, so some of that could explain an increase in income,” said Trudi Renwick, an assistant division chief at Census Bureau.
Middle-class income rose above $61,000 for the first time last year, U.S. Census Bureau says
Crossing the $61,000 mark signals the American middle-class may have finally earned more than it did in 1999, although the Census Bureau cautions that median income last year was not statistically different from 1999 or 2007.
So, the Middle Class has made NO GAINS since 1999 and you think that's great?
Keep in mind that even Communism has its 1%ers. The difference is that there is no middle class, the entire 99% is dirt poor.How Rising Inequality Has Widened the Justice Gap
Rising inequality has harmed low-income families not only by depriving them of a fair share of society’s income growth, but also in a more specific way: It has stacked the legal system even more heavily against them.
According to a recent survey, more than 70 percent of low-income American households had been involved in eviction cases, labor law cases, and other civil legal disputes during the preceding year, and in more than 80 percent of those cases they lacked effective legal representation.
Indigent persons charged with crimes are entitled to state-sponsored lawyers, but here, too, funding shortages are widespread.
The stakes in criminal proceedings are often enormous, but civil disputes often produce life-shattering outcomes as well.
That’s why Congress created the Legal Services Corporation in 1974, a nonprofit whose mission is to support civil legal aid for low-income citizens. But the Legal Services Corporation was never adequately funded. And in the ensuing decades, rising income inequality has contributed both to a reduction in the supply of legal assistance to low-income families and an increase in the need for it.
.....the Legal Services Corporation, which received more than $860 million in 1981, received only $385 million in 2017(both in 2017 dollars).
************************************************************************
A disabled friend was charged with a crime he physically could not have committed (Dr's assessment). A store security camera and a store manager reinforced that he was not guilty. Still the judge told him that if he couldn't prove himself INNOCENT he was going to jail. Is this justice for all? of course not. There are two systems of justice in America. One for the rich and one for the poor.
Depends on who is counting and how the numbers stack upYou could also say it's an anomaly, One data point doesn't constitute a trend.
That line looks pretty flat to be but I'd say the Middle Class started to make some slight gains under Obama.
Our Middle Class is rapidly vanishing more so than in any other industrialized Democratic nation.Keep in mind that even Communism has its 1%ers. The difference is that there is no middle class, the entire 99% is dirt poor.
FollowTheWay's definition of middle class vanishing, as reported by the Washington Post yesterday:Our Middle Class is rapidly vanishing more so than in any other industrialized Democratic nation.
How do you interpret no income gains (real terms) since 1999? The top 0.1% has tripled their wealth since then.FollowTheWay's definition of middle class vanishing, as reported by the Washington Post yesterday:
Middle-class income rose above $61,000 for the first time last year, U.S. Census Bureau says
Middle-class income rose to the highest recorded levels in 2017 and the national poverty rate declined as the benefits of the strong economy lifted the fortunes of more Americans, the U.S. Census reported Wednesday.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
[/Size]
Very simple. Your chart shows differences in net wealth. The subject is income inequality. They are not the same thing.View attachment 2455
How do you interpret no income gains (real terms) since 1999? The top 0.1% has tripled their wealth since then.
Middle-class household income has been rising steadily for the past several years as the economy has rebounded from the deep recession and millions of Americans have found jobs again. The extra pay from having another person in the home employed again or working additional hours is the largest factor contributing to rising income, the Census Bureau said.Very simple. Your chart shows differences in net wealth. The subject is income inequality. They are not the same thing.
You are conflating two different things. Not surprising as you move the goalposts all the time.
As to the 1999 thing, the article explained that 1999 and 2007 were essentially the same statistics when accounting methods are normalized. Therefore, we are finally seeing middle incomes rise following the Great Recession. It's taken this long because Obama's recovery was the slowest moving one in US history.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
Middle-class household income has been rising steadily for the past several years as the economy has rebounded from the deep recession and millions of Americans have found jobs again. The extra pay from having another person in the home employed again or working additional hours is the largest factor contributing to rising income, the Census Bureau said.
View attachment 2456
Most of the gains came under Obama. Trump has benefited from the continuing rebound from the Great Recession under Obama.
The study, released Thursday from the Economic Policy Institute, found that the top 1% of U.S. citizens, in terms of income, took home 85% of income growth between 2009 and 2013. In 15 states, the top 1% captured all income growth during the same four-year period.HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!
The study, released Thursday from the Economic Policy Institute, found that the top 1% of U.S. citizens, in terms of income, took home 85% of income growth between 2009 and 2013. In 15 states, the top 1% captured all income growth during the same four-year period.
Naturally, that disproportionate income growth has helped bolster their salaries. By 2013, the top 1% of families nationwide made more than 25 times as much as the other 99% of households. In New York, Connecticut and Wyoming, the highest-earning households had average incomes that were 40 times those of everyone else.
The study, released Thursday from the Economic Policy Institute, found that the top 1% of U.S. citizens, in terms of income, took home 85% of income growth between 2009 and 2013. In 15 states, the top 1% captured all income growth during the same four-year period.
Naturally, that disproportionate income growth has helped bolster their salaries. By 2013, the top 1% of families nationwide made more than 25 times as much as the other 99% of households. In New York, Connecticut and Wyoming, the highest-earning households had average incomes that were 40 times those of everyone else.
You just don't understand and I'm tired of explaining it.Gee, I don't know, is that why they are called the ONE-PERCENTERS?
Please tell us what the problem is with having the 1% earning 25X what lower income people earn?
Also, what is the threshold for it becoming a problem? Was it a problem when they made 5X what lower income people make?
If someone makes $60,000 a year, is it a problem if someone makes $300,000 a year? Why or why not?
How about 10X? What about 15X?
How about 25X as much?
If a person makes 25X the median income, or $1.525 million, is that a problem?
Are the 5,000 actors, pro athletes, lottery winners, and heirs that make at least $1.5 million a threat to low income people? How?