Humble Disciple
Active Member
Those who support police reform are ignorant of statistics.
If that were true, why does the Libertarian party support it?
Are Rand Paul and Mitt Romney "woke" too?
Last edited:
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Those who support police reform are ignorant of statistics.
Libertarian party is a bunch of nutts. Romney is a piece of crap. What Rand Paul supports is reform in name only.If that were true, why does the Libertarian party support it?
Are Rand Paul and Mitt Romney "woke" too?
Libertarian party is a bunch of nutts. Romney is a piece of crap. What Rand Paul supports is reform in name only.
Conservatism.if you see Conservatism as extremism, so be it.If the Republican Party doesn't move away from the extremism you are promoting, it won't have much of an electoral future.
What "extremism" would that be?If the Republican Party doesn't move away from the extremism you are promoting, it won't have much of an electoral future.
What "extremism" would that be?
Police Reform Fact Sheet
SUPPORT FOR MORE TRAINING
68% say police officers need additional training on how to handle confrontations with citizens, including 6 in 10 white Americans, and 8 in 10 Hispanic and black Americans.
SUPPORT BODY CAMERAS
9 in 10 across race/ethnic groups support police body cameras. 51% would pay higher taxes to outfit a local department with cameras.
SUPPORT POLICE USING DRONES
6 in 10 support police regularly using drones to assist in their police work. But 54% also worry police drones may invade their privacy.
OUTSIDE AGENCY INVESTIGATE MISCONDUCT
8 in 10 support having outside law enforcement agencies investigate alleged police misconduct rather than leave the investigation to the local police department.
SUPPORT PEDESTRIAN STOPS
Two-thirds support police officers stopping and searching people for weapons or drugs who "look suspicious" or "out of place."
OPPOSE CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE
84% say police should only "be able to take a person's money or property that is suspected to have been involved in a drug crime" if the person is convicted, not before. 76% want properly seized assets directed toward a state-level fund.
OPPOSE POLICE USING MILITARY WEAPONS
54% say police departments using military weapons and armored vehicles are "going too far" while 46% believe this equipment is "necessary for law enforcement purposes."
OPPOSE RACIAL PROFILING
63% oppose police officers "stopping motorists or pedestrians of certain racial or ethnic groups because the officer believes that these groups are more likely than others to commit certain types of crimes." But 65% think the practice is commonly used.
https://www.cato.org/policing-in-america/chapter-4/police-reform-fact-sheet
Specifically what police reforms are you referring to that Reps oppose? Right now, the Dems are unhinged with their efforts to destabilize policing. Their goal appears to be to nationalize the police.The CATO Institute isn't exactly a left-wing organization. If the Republican Party wants to win moderates and independents in the future, and not just the hard right, then it will need to support police reform. Rather than de-funding the police, we need to reform their training and practices.
A little. Most SBC members do not care about the debate at all. But there are very vocal folks on both sides who make it sound like disunity.So in the end, this is again about disunity in the SBC. Some things never ever change.
I prefer a good sharp pitchfork. It was good enough for the Reformers so it should be good enough for me. I also wish I had been named Ulrich, but that's another story...Are Calvinists and Arminians in the general belief that the other position is false teaching, maybe even a doctrine of demons? If we think each other are so dangerous to others, especially unbelievers, are we doing the right thing by having the goal of cordial and polite discussion where we agree to agree to disagree?
I noticed a lot of heat in discussions in this forum. At first I thought it wrong, but dwelling on scripture. It seems we have very differing views of God and His nature. What would Paul say if teachers showed up with a teaching that radically misunderstood God? I can't imagine anything good.
So, my question is how do we approach one another in your view, while being true to our convictions?
29. The best and infallible preparation for grace and the sole disposition toward grace is the eternal election and predestination of God.
30. On the part of man, however, nothing precedes grace except indisposition and even rebellion against grace.
https://www.uniontheology.org/resources/historical/medieval/the-97-theses
Was this before or after the attempt to drown Anabaptists...[emoji848][emoji10][emoji6]If you are an Arminian who loves Jesus, that’s awesome. As the slogan of the Reformation goes, “In essentials, unity; in non-essentials, liberty; in all things, charity.”
Was this before or after the attempt to drown Anabaptists...[emoji848][emoji10][emoji6]
" Put them in mind to be subject to principalities and powers, to obey magistrates, to be ready to every good work,Libertarian party is a bunch of nutts. Romney is a piece of crap. What Rand Paul supports is reform in name only.
I don't know who is responsible for that phrase, but I see nothing in God's word to indicate that His people should adopt it or even pay any attention to at least the first two thirds of it.If you are an Arminian who loves Jesus, that’s awesome. As the slogan of the Reformation goes, “In essentials, unity; in non-essentials, liberty; in all things, charity.”
So after they drown the Anabaptists and caused them to flee to Ukraine and parts elsewhere. After the 30 years war when Gustavus Adolphus brought his troops down from Sweden to save the Reformation from being crushed by Rome.The quote is from a hundred years after Martin Luther.
Rupertus Meldenius - Wikipedia
According to God's word, He seeks those who worship Him in spirit and in truth:At the end of the day, it's more important to love God than to be right about everything.
The Origin of “In Essentials Unity…”If you are an Arminian who loves Jesus, that’s awesome. As the slogan of the Reformation goes, “In essentials, unity; in non-essentials, liberty; in all things, charity.”
" Put them in mind to be subject to principalities and powers, to obey magistrates, to be ready to every good work,
2 to speak evil of no man, to be no brawlers, but gentle, shewing all meekness unto all men.
3 For we ourselves also were sometimes foolish, disobedient, deceived, serving divers lusts and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful, and hating one another.
4 But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared,
5 not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost; 6 which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour;
7 that being justified by his grace, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life." ( Titus 3:1-7 ).
My friend, in the light of the above, should we be making such comments...especially on a publicly-viewable forum?
Yep." Put them in mind to be subject to principalities and powers, to obey magistrates, to be ready to every good work,
2 to speak evil of no man, to be no brawlers, but gentle, shewing all meekness unto all men.
3 For we ourselves also were sometimes foolish, disobedient, deceived, serving divers lusts and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful, and hating one another.
4 But after that the kindness and love of God our Saviour toward man appeared,
5 not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost; 6 which he shed on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Saviour;
7 that being justified by his grace, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life." ( Titus 3:1-7 ).
My friend, in the light of the above, should we be making such comments...especially on a publicly-viewable forum?