1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

How to defeat the EIREITAD heresy!

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by Lacy Evans, Aug 8, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. James_Newman

    James_Newman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    5,013
    Likes Received:
    0
    What sin? Apparently only some of them used to be sinners. The rest of them were already saved?
     
  2. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
    David faced the chastisement of sin many times on this earth. That is one of those times. The death of his infant was part of God chastising David for his great sin against Him.
    His sins were forgiven as far as salvation was concerned. David would never lose his salvation. Here is an important question for you (and especially Bro Bob who isn't a ME believer). If David had died before Nathan had a chance to reach him (i.e. before he repented) :
    1. would he have gone to heaven (paradise)?
    2. would he have been excluded from the kingdom? (still to come)
     
  3. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
    Read the first chapter of 1Corinthians. He was writing to the saints, the saved, believers. All of them were saved. They were saved and were saved from the penaly of all of their sins--past present and future. There is no sin that can imputed against the believer. He stands before God clothed in the righteousness of Jesus Christ. As far as God is concerned when God looks down upon DHK he does not see DHK, he sees the righteousness of Jesus Christ. The sins of DHK have all been covered by the blood of Christ.
     
  4. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    5
    This is probably going to make me sound Calvinistic :eek: :tongue3: but I think that God might not have let him die before he repented.

    Don't do this :tonofbricks: to me!

    Just a thought.
     
  5. James_Newman

    James_Newman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    5,013
    Likes Received:
    0
    So the death of his baby was a 'penalty for sin'.
    I agree.
    every saved individual will be raised up on the last day. If David is saved, he will be raised up on the last day
    In my opinion, yes. If he had not been confronted by Nathan and repented of his sin, and instead died in that state of unrepentant murder and adultery, he would not have been accepted into the kingdom.
     
  6. James_Newman

    James_Newman New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2004
    Messages:
    5,013
    Likes Received:
    0
    I realize they were all saved, I just don't know what you think they were saved from if only some of them used to be sinners.
    1 Corinthians 6:11
    11 And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.
     
  7. standingfirminChrist

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2005
    Messages:
    9,454
    Likes Received:
    3
    I do not believe David will be raised up on the last day. I believe David was one of the many dead who were seen in the city after Christ's crucifixion.

    I believe the saints before the cross are going to be the guests at the marriage supper of the Lamb. The saints after the cross (the Church) will be the Bride.
     
  8. Rufus_1611

    Rufus_1611 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    3,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm only keeping up with a couple of the many threads on this topic that have been opened and it is difficult to sift through the chaff to get to the wheat of real dialogue.

    I'm not judging other men's hearts. I'm judging deeds that God says will keep men from inheriting His kingdom. Further, it should not take a spiritual genius to recognize that one who commits adultery has adultery in his heart. It's the Pharisees that are difficult to identify, not the ones who place their sins before all to see.

    If someone confesses that Jesus Christ is their saviour, then I can only trust that they are being truthful. I am further encouraged when they can make the 1 John 4:2 confession.

    A carnal Christian is one who confesses Christ but is still living in the world, a carnal Christian is a babe in Christ. You have carnal Christians being sanctified. Sanctification occurs as the carnal mature.
    The ones the Holy Bible says will keep people from inheriting the kingdom.

    From 1 Corinthians 6:9-10

    • fornication
    • idolatry
    • adultery
    • effeminate
    • abusers of themselves with mankind
    • thieves
    • covetous
    • drunkards
    • revilers
    • extortioners

    From Galatians 5:21
    • envyings
    • murders
    • drunkenness
    • revellings
    • such like

    From Ephesians 5:5
    • whoremongerers
    • unclean person
    • covetous man
    • idolaters

    "From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand." - Matthew 4:17

    "But as he which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation;Because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy." - 1 Peter 1:15-16

    It's a wicked heart that does wicked deeds.

    I would say you're perhaps not representing Lot fairly. He was wrong to offer his daughters but he was never faced with executing his offer. The sin of drunkenness and the sin of incest was upon his daughters. The daughters, "made their father drink wine" and "he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose." Will you please elaborate on your point of bringing up Lot?

    I do not deny that he was a Christian.
     
  9. Hope of Glory

    Hope of Glory New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    0
    I can't believe that you would take that verse so out of context! (See, I can do it just like you can!)

    It says the sin is lawlessness. The sin. Single. It's talking about something specific. What is lawlessness?
     
  10. Hope of Glory

    Hope of Glory New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    0
    And what happens if you don't access the blood by confessing?
     
  11. Hope of Glory

    Hope of Glory New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  12. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    5
    1 John 3
    4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.

    What are you talking about, "the sin"?
     
  13. Hope of Glory

    Hope of Glory New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    0
    He died that all might be saved.

    There, I answered. Now, it's your turn:

    Why and for whom was his blood shed?
     
  14. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    5
    It must have been for all those Jews who were already saved. :rolleyes:
     
  15. Lacy Evans

    Lacy Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    0
    Some of the ones from Corinth!
     
  16. Hope of Glory

    Hope of Glory New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    0
    Aw, c'mon, Amy! One of your own was even discussing "the sin" in this very passage, about a week ago.

    It's posted, discussed, and Amy of course comes out with "why don't you post some scripture?" type of statement.

    The verse has the definite article; it's talking about one specific sin, not a general sort of "well, I done did wrong, Jimmy Joe".

    So, what is lawlessness?

    And why won't you answer my question?!? Who was the blood shed for?
     
  17. Amy.G

    Amy.G New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2006
    Messages:
    13,103
    Likes Received:
    5
    Matthew 26
    27 And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it;
    28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.
     
  18. DHK

    DHK <b>Moderator</b>

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2000
    Messages:
    37,982
    Likes Received:
    137
    More accurately it was God chastixing him for his sin on this earth, just as a father chastises or disciplines his own child. It has no bearing on his salvation.
    This is how far off ME doctrine is. The Kingdom was David's whether he would have suddenly died of a heart attack or not. It was Christ who take David's throne. Remember: "Christ the son of David" But yet you would say: "Christ the son of a pagan (as is every unsaved man). That is blasphemy and a blasphemous doctrine. Whether or not David repented would have no bearing on him entering into the Kingdom. God had promised it to him, and does not lie.
     
  19. Lacy Evans

    Lacy Evans New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2003
    Messages:
    2,364
    Likes Received:
    0
    huh?

    "Yet you would say Christ the son of a pagan"? What in the world are you talking about and how did you reach such a conclusion about what James would say?

    Why do you all collectively insist on telling us what we believe? is it a new debate tactic? Do you PM one another and say, "Let's just mess with them"? Man it's irritating. We spend half of our bandwidth :) explaining that we never said what you guys say we said and that we don't believe what you all say we believe.
     
    #199 Lacy Evans, Aug 14, 2007
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 14, 2007
  20. Hope of Glory

    Hope of Glory New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    4,807
    Likes Received:
    0
    If he died for all, who are the many?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...