makahiya117
New Member
"the Bible" - can you show me where they meant just the KJV?
Really, do you think they were talking about the 1881 RV in 1776 ?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
"the Bible" - can you show me where they meant just the KJV?
" A peacock is no more perfect or beautiful than a swan. A peacock is simply magnified in the details.
Beauty under a magnifying glass, is magnified beauty. When early English Bibles dawned, their simple lines
were like the swan. Now they pale with the magnified details of the beautiful King James Bible.
The previous Bishop’s Bible 1568-1611 was no less perfect, pure, and true than the KJV.
It’s beauty was simply polished, like pure gold is polished, so that the KJV magnifies and mirrors
more finely the glorious reflection of our precious Saviour, Jesus, the author. ”
Dr. Gail Riplinger
Really, do you think they were talking about the 1881 RV in 1776 ?
So what, the RV, ASV, NASV and the NIV don't match.
Neither does the Old Testament and the Septuagent.
Really, do you think they were talking about the 1881 RV in 1776 ?
I brought my Modern Language Bible with me to South Korea in 1998.John Alden brought a KJV Bible to America on the Mayflower.
Log can correct me on this,but I think the Geneva Bible and Bishop's Bible were more commonly used in early America.John Wheelright quoted from a KJV Bible in a 1636 sermon.
He updated a number of expressions in the KJV.Webster's 1828 dictionary matched the KJV Holy Bibles.
No,that would be a dictionary.Language is word definition.
Mak,please try to make an honest attempt at answering Franklin's questions.In these few examples, how can the very different and additional words found in the Bishops' text be said to be "no less perfect, pure, and true than the KJV" words? Is the sycamore tree more perfect or beautiful than the fig tree? Is leaving out the words "out of the Northeast" simply a polishing or magnification of an already perfect text?
Rippon said:Log can correct me on this,but I think the Geneva Bible and Bishop's Bible were more commonly used in early America.
So, you quoted "Dr. Gail Riplinger" (is she really a Dr.?) as an expert or authority. No one is claiming the RV, ASV, BASV or NIV are perfect. She claimed the Bishops' was as perfect as the KJV, and since the two texts are quite different, that cannot be true.So what, the RV, ASV, NASV and the NIV don't match. ...
What does this quote have to do with Scripture?" We must help the fallen become weak, the weak become strong,
the strong become useful and the useful become mature. "
Dr. Jack Hyles
How does this quote have relate to the other quotes in the OP? He could have said this about many things. What was the context of this quote? This quote by itself has no meaning." We must help the fallen become weak, the weak become strong,
the strong become useful and the useful become mature. "
Dr. Jack Hyles
Dr. Jack Hyles build the largest church of his day
and (First Baptist Church) baptized 5,030 on one single Sunday.
Dr. Peter Ruckman is the world's most prolific KJV scholar of all time.
Dr. Gail Riplinger published the world's most comprehensive computational linguistics research of bible canonization apologetics.
KJV For he whom God hath sent speaketh the words of God:
for God giveth not the Spirit by measure unto him.
You do not understand the Purified Text Theory or the Record Theory.
The Record Theory independently answers the questions of final authority
and final canonization (books and words). The dynamic Purified Text Theory
supports the Record Theory, demonstrated categorically and conclusively
in the manuscript evidence, bible canonization, bible doctrine,
billions of bibles and computational linguistics.