What is insulting is, when evidence is shown, it is met with obstinance and repetitive assertions as has been seen on these multiple threads.Not interested in a Biblical discussion on this, eh? Insults suit you better I guess. Well, count me out in any further discussion with you.
But I do hope to start another thread on STOICHEIA. It is another one of the terms where commited futurists have to slant the meaning to prop up their unfounded beliefs.
I gave precisely the meaning, and the response is “ Not interested in a Biblical discussion on this, eh?”.
You wanted proof of meaning, I gave it.
Did it modify your thinking?
Do you honestly consider ANY proof offered (as has been repeatedly on the threads) will change either your character or view?
The post wasn’t an insult, it was presenting a fact built on the bases of interaction over numerous threads on this subject.
If folks want true interaction then when definitions are given showing the weakness of the one selected to sustain a view, then it is reliably certain that either the person holding the view will modify or be found entrenched in obstinacy.
The question remains on which attitude you intend to take.