How so?NO! It is to show from the passage that the Essential unity of the Father and Son are taught in this verse. This is because there are some, like John Calvin, who argue against this meaning here.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
How so?NO! It is to show from the passage that the Essential unity of the Father and Son are taught in this verse. This is because there are some, like John Calvin, who argue against this meaning here.
Meaning neither I, nor millions of others, needed the finer points of Greek grammar to figure that out or to prove it to others.sounds good, meaning what?
As it is the Father Who is here addressing the Son as "God", there can be no "subordination" as there are no degrees of Deity within the Godhead.
Nonsense, Hebrews 1:2He was PNLY temp subordination, while here upon the earth, as His "glory: that he had with the Father was to be restored at His ascension!
Jesus in John 17 stated that he was to receive BACK his former glory, correct?Nonsense, Hebrews 1:2
Yes, God the Son relinquished His "glory" to become God incarnate. But this has nothing to do with God the Son operating in subordination to the Father to accomplish the Triune God's purposes.Jesus in John 17 stated that he was to receive BACK his former glory, correct?
Meaning neither I, nor millions of others, needed the finer points of Greek grammar to figure that out or to prove it to others.
How so?
Yes, God the Son relinquished His "glory" to become God incarnate. But this has nothing to do with God the Son operating in subordination to the Father to accomplish the Triune God's purposes.
Attacking the poster with claims like I did not reference Hebrews 1:2 seems pathetic to me.I wonder where you get your "theology" from, because it is not from the 66 Books of the Holy Bible?
he did, while here on the earth, but back to fully equal now!Yes, God the Son relinquished His "glory" to become God incarnate. But this has nothing to do with God the Son operating in subordination to the Father to accomplish the Triune God's purposes.
I really want to have Van write a Systematic theology, would be "interesting"I wonder where you get your "theology" from, because it is not from the 66 Books of the Holy Bible?
How Calvin was wrong?how so what?
he did, while here on the earth, but back to fully equal now!
I really want to have Van write a Systematic theology, would be "interesting"
How Calvin was wrong?
Fiction. God the Son takes direction from the Father, thus operates in subordination to the Father. And the Holy Spirit takes direction from both God the Son and God the Father.he did, while here on the earth, but back to fully equal now!