1. Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Is Christ "completely God, completely flesh"?

Discussion in 'Baptist Theology & Bible Study' started by 1689Dave, Aug 16, 2020.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. atpollard

    atpollard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    4,714
    Likes Received:
    1,174
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I was defending nothing, I just don't particularly like your posts.
    You are a 'passive-agressive' anti-Calvinist troll.

    (and the word is "smoke screen" as in "something designed to obscure, confuse, or mislead" ... your post is a "screed" as in "a ranting piece of writing") - that was my passive-agressive response, just helping you out with your vocabulary.
     
  2. atpollard

    atpollard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    4,714
    Likes Received:
    1,174
    Faith:
    Baptist
    FACT CHECK:

    The QUESTION:
    The Answer (post #97):
    DOES POST #97 "ANSWER" THE QUESTION?
    DOES POST #97 "ADDRESS" THE QUESTION?

    Let the reader decide for themselves.
     
  3. 1689Dave

    1689Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    708
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The Symbol of Chalcedon speaks for me.......loud and clear. Only a heretic would challenge it.
     
  4. 1689Dave

    1689Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    708
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The creeds only summarize the bible topics. Do you have any books? Why those and not the creeds?
     
  5. 1689Dave

    1689Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    708
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The creeds give a full overview most are unaware of, and therefore easily led astray. I think we proved that here.
     
  6. atpollard

    atpollard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    4,714
    Likes Received:
    1,174
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I have to admit that I never heard of it before y'all started talking about it here. I was more familiar with the Athanasian Creed (from the Lutheran Satire video on St. Patrick and the Trinity) so I had looked up and studied that. I had also studied the Nicene Creed and the Apostles Creed. There was a board that required members to affirm agreement with the Nicene Creed to post as a Christian. In general, I never had any problem with any of them once I understood the difference between "catholic" and "Catholic". I am ok with the catholic church but have some doctrinal issues with the Catholic Church. I have found the Nicene Creed a useful 'shibboleth' for rooting out 'cults'. People that have serious problems with the basics tend to raise red flags that suggest a closer examination is in order. I have problems calling someone "Christian" that denies the deity of Christ or His virgin birth or his death and resurrection.

    The Symbol of Chalcedon didn't cause me any heartburn either. There was nothing in there that I had a problem with. I saw Van's point that one COULD nit pick words to create biblical untruth, but nothing prevents people from doing that with Scripture and we don't advocate restricting Bibles to Professional Clergy. So that seems a poor excuse to be "hating" on creeds.

    I think that JonC has made a valid point that Creeds fall below scripture in authority. I don't think for a minute that you would disagree with that. Where the usefulness of creeds and the danger of rejecting them completely lies is in an area of advice given me by a mentor. He told me that if I discovered a meaning in scripture that no one else in 2000 years had ever seen, I was almost certainly wrong and should proceed with extreme caution.. In the same spirit, if you believe something that contradicts the earliest ecumenical creeds, there is a high probability that what you believe is not correct and you should proceed with extreme caution.

    The creeds serve as a warning fence that one may be drifting too far off the path for safety. Like a guardrail, they are not meant to replace a GPS or a roadmap, they are just a warning from those that traveled the road before you to keep you from driving off a cliff.

    So I am still Sola Scriptura, Sola fide, Sola gratia, Solo Christo, Soli Deo gloria ... I am just willing to take some advice from Creeds and Confessions and Statements of Faith to see what those that trod this road before me had to say.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. 1689Dave

    1689Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    708
    Faith:
    Baptist
    All of the Lutheran and Reformed Creeds came from believers in sola scriptura. Perhaps you aren't clear on the matter.
     
  8. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    The Athanasian Creed is the "standard" for Reformed Theology, Lutheran doctrine, even Catholic doctrine. So I think that is why we hear of it so often.

    Those who are Calvinists are dependent on the Belgic Confession which was based on three creeds -the Apostles' Creed, Nicene Creed, and Athanasian Creed. So the Athanasian Creed. is probably the most often cited.

    But the Athanasian Creed was written a little over a century after the Chalcedonian Creed (the Chalcedonian Creed was written in 451 AD, the Athanasian creed around 570 AD). The Athanaisan Creed is usually considered the standard of orthodoxy because it is better developed and expresses the faith of the Church. We do not know the details of it's origin and it is often referred to as the Quicunque Vult (from the first words of the creed). The creed came to be called the Athanasian Creed because in the middle ages it was attributed to Athanisus.

    As Baptists, however, we view these creeds as useful (certainly interesting) in explaining the nature of the Trinity and the Hypostatic Uniion. But we do not consider the creeds an authority for our doctrine.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. JonC

    JonC Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2001
    Messages:
    35,198
    Likes Received:
    3,791
    Faith:
    Baptist
    They are useful in describing common belief. The standard of orthodoxy is the latter creed - the Athanasian Creed (the quicunque vult). And as far as I know you are the only person who has objected to Christ being One Person, completely God, completely man.

    If you think another member has rejected that Christ is " One Person, completely God, completely man" then please provide a quote so that we can examine it. Even here the standard is Scripture and not the creed (whether the 5th Century Chalcedonian Creed or the 6th Century Athanasian Creed).

    I personally believe that the Roman Catholic Church was born an apostate (not a church) in the fourth century (a century before the Chalcedonian Creed). There were Christians within the structure, but the church itself (from a Baptist perspective) was false. To submit to the authority of either creed is to submit to the Roman Catholic Church because that is where the authority originated. But to say that either or both creeds are useful or accurate in its description and definitions is another.

    So while I do agree (obviously) with both the Chalcedonian Creed and the Athanasian Creed I view the Anthansian as superior as it was an expression of orthodox faith rather than a reaction to heresies (the Chalcedonian Counsel addressed Arianism, Apollinarianism, Eutychianism,and Nestorianism). Developed theology is always a better expression than reactionary theology.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    How did we get from trying to understand how to view the person of Jesus to full blown rant on Calvinism by Van?
     
  11. atpollard

    atpollard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    4,714
    Likes Received:
    1,174
    Faith:
    Baptist
    So did the Westminster Confession of Faith, which I have read and found too archaic in grammar and verbiage for my taste (same complaint I have with the KJV and Shakesphere). That does not mean that I agree with every word on the WCF or that I would ever hold it equal in authority to Scripture. So what part of this matter am I not clear on? Sola Scriptura means "Scripture Alone" and Scripture" is the 66 books that are recognized as God Breathed. Commentaries, even great commentaries, on those 66 books are not Scripture. That is just a fact.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Baptist Confession of faith !
    Can one know and understand the theology and doctrines of the Bible without any Creed or Confession?
     
  13. Yeshua1

    Yeshua1 Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    52,624
    Likes Received:
    2,742
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I like using the 1689 LBCF, but in a modernized english version!
     
  14. atpollard

    atpollard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    4,714
    Likes Received:
    1,174
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I've read that, too.

    To my surprise, I really liked the Heidelberg Catechism. It did a good job of presenting the important stuff without getting in the weeds on the fine points that people like to argue over.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. Van

    Van Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    28,745
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Liberals tell others twaddle.
     
  16. Van

    Van Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    28,745
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I quoted the creed so I addressed and answered the question, what does the creed say.
    More gibberish smokescreed.
     
  17. Van

    Van Well-Known Member
    Site Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2011
    Messages:
    28,745
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    Faith:
    Baptist
    I support biblical doctrines from scripture, which is a distinctive of Baptists. Sola Scripture ring a bell?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  18. Squire Robertsson

    Squire Robertsson Administrator
    Administrator

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2000
    Messages:
    15,371
    Likes Received:
    2,405
    Faith:
    Baptist
    IMHO, the primary Baptist Distinctive is:

    The Bible is our only rule for Faith and Practice.

    Creeds, confessions, and statements of Faith are useful. But, one must be careful to read creeds, confessions, and statements of faith through the lens of Scripture and not the other way around.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  19. 1689Dave

    1689Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    708
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Why do you think I do not? The Creeds are biblical doctrines from scripture.
     
  20. 1689Dave

    1689Dave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    7,953
    Likes Received:
    708
    Faith:
    Baptist
    Not in depth. It takes the wisdom of combined learning over the centuries that you are incapable of.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...