Allan said:
Hey James,
You know I'm more about civility even in disagrement but lets keep the gloves on and just box.
With that said:
When the Calvinists aquiried their a foothold of power didn't they hunt, kill, and burn all of 'us' Non-Calvinists. Did they not extremely persecute the non-Cal. in Europe and early America?? Answer - Yes. So what is my point?? That this does nothing for the discussion here nor your view.
Keep it clean brother but have fun boxing :thumbs:
Not really,
Yes it did happen 2-3 times. It seems like this is the way people handle things back then. This is another reason I brought this up. When the hate starts flowing as you seen above, the next thing you see is where "John Calivin burns someone"...as seen below.
On October 27, 1553 John Calvin, the founder of Calvinism, had Michael Servetus, the Spanish physician, burned at the stake just outside of Geneva for his doctrinal heresies!(1) Hence, the originator of the popular doctrine of "once saved, always saved" (known in certain circles as "the perseverance of the saints") violated the cry of the Reformation -- "Sola Scriptura" -- by murdering a doctrinal heretic without Scriptural justification.
What is funny is how non-Calvinist come running to defend a person that has just bashed a known doctrine held by many in the church and held by many of the top church leaders of the past. Calling the doctrines of grace "ABSURD, anti-Christian, anti-Bible doctrine". I like this line.."Regeneration before these things is an
unscriptural, philosophical assumption (as is most of
Calvin's followers’ nonsense) to
cover up the Calvinist TULIP doctrine. Both regeneration and
election are CONDITIONAL! "....don't you?
Most of what was said shows poor understanding of the doctrines of Grace, and for that we get ..."
Amen...
Preach it brother!!!" And because I just bring up the next logical step to rid the world of this unscriptural, philosophical assumption, to burn the Calvinist and their evil Bibles, you feel it is I that has over stepped?
Humm...that tells me something.
There was alot of burning going on, back then. Not that any of it was right,
but it should not be viewed as sola Calvinist driven. As a matter of fact, there are only a
small number that I know of that were killed by Calvinist.
Some CALVINIST (doctrine of Grace) put to death.........
John Wyclif, John Huss,Jerome of Prague, William Sautre, John Claydon, Thomas Bilvey, William Tyndale, James Bainham, John Lambert, Robert Barnes, Arnoud Diericx, Gillis Verdickt, Carolus de Koninck, Antoon Verdickt, Adriaan Coreman the painter, and Hendrik Snoelacke van Boekholt the tailor.. Then you have the persecutions of John Bunyan, Martin Luther, John Calvin and scores of others..Puritans and Pilgrims (a minority) who ran from the King James of England who wanted to jail them.
Please read what happened to the Dutch Church.
http://www.digitalbookindex.com/_search/search010hsteuropeandutchreva.asp
Also read "Marks of the Children of God"...and...."Foxes Book"
As to John Calvin, Calvin did not kill any one as claimed by the statement shown above. You see stuff like this all the time. Calvin did tell the state that doctrinal heresies of a man, and at that time it was the law of the land to put to death those that held to
some heresies. Thank God we do not have that law in this nation. Calvin did not do the burning...for Calvin did not have the power. It was the state. It was the state that had the law...that enforced the law...that put one person to death for this crime. Calvin as not to have him burned. Yet even if you blaim Calvin, this was done my all sides. None of it was right.
Therefore you are wrong in saying this was Calvinsit doing this.
In England it was King James that had the power to jail Puritans and Pilgrims and did so. Puritans and Pilgrims were Calvinist. Your post just showes another anti Calvinist hate saying this was all Calvins doing. No jail time, or killing was right, yet it was done my all.
Why bring this up? Well with the hate posted above and the lack of education, and to have others say "amen" and defend this, is to follow the same paths of yesteryear. If it was wrong back then, it is wrong today.
I need to keep it clean? How about those that would have us
gone? How about those that say we are
ABSURD, anti-Christian, anti-Bible doctrine and follow a man and not God? Do you think this is clean? No...it is stupid. So is burning people for their faith.
Where is all this "love" that Freewillers talk about so much?? Love the other man...as long as they believe as I. Other wise...get out the matches.
So...what should we do? Should we debate from the Bible the truths, or just go ahead and burn the Calvinist? I'll burn for my God and my Bible....go ahead...light me up.
In Christ...James