First of all, there is a huge difference between destruction (which is what appears to be happening in the above texts), and eternal torment. Second, this post seems to simply say what I think most ETers seem to say - it simply asserts we are not in a position to "judge" God's definiton of love. Sure, there is the familiar Romans quote about the potter. I could post Biblical text that would be hard to reconcile with eternal torment. Argument by "verse" has some value, but I think we can do better.Originally posted by eloidalmanutha:
*** ALL living, breathing human beings on earth, but 8, were destroyed in the flood.
*** All of the inhabitants of cities were killed by order of God, including children and women [Deut 13]
*** Because of David's disobedience, God sent a plague to kill 70,000 men [1 Chron 21]
*** Ananais and Sapphira were instantly killed when they lied.
*** Job's whole family was wiped out to prove a point, by the Hand of God [Job 1:11,21 & 2:5]
*** Korah's whole family was destroyed because of his sin - sons, daughters and wives
the list is a lot longer. God is also the Perfect Righteous Judge. He is Eternal, Infinite, Wise - we are but a breath, who are we to say what is "love" in God's Mind?
Rom 9:18 So, then, to whom He desires, He shows mercy. And to whom He desires, He hardens.
19 You will then say to me, Why does He yet find fault? For who has resisted His will?
20 Yes, rather, O man, who are you answering against God? Shall the thing formed say to the One forming it, Why did You make me like this? Isa. 29:16
21 Or does not the potter have authority over the clay, out of the one lump to make one vessel to honor, and one to dishonor? Jer. 18:6
22 But if God, desiring to demonstrate His wrath, and to make His power known, endured in much long-suffering vessels of wrath having been fitted out for destruction, . . ."
I think we need to take the concept of love seriously - it cannot be a meaningless placeholder into which we insert all sorts of obviously contradictory notions. It is simply too "easy" to say that we cannot understand God's love. Sure, we may not be able to grasp its entire scope, but that which we can grasp has to be sensible and usable by us. And this is where the ET position runs into trouble. If we are to actually deploy the concept of God's love in the world it has to strike a chord of recognition in us - we need to respond to this revelation with an "Aha!" that effectively says "this is right, this is the heart of God". The idea of eternal torment produces the opposite response - one of bewilderment and non-sensibility. Is this the hallmark of God's real revelation to us?