robertguwapito
New Member
Or to rephrase the question, "Is it moral to preserve one's life (Kill) in self-defense?"
Following Tomas Aquinas' logic:
1. Natural law dictates that it is normal to preserve one’s life.
2. Since it is a principle of natural law, it is therefore moral to preserve one's life.
3. Since it is moral to preserve one’s life, it is therefore lawful to defend one’s life.
4. Therefore, self-defense is a moral act and lawful act.
It seems that there are quite a few peacenik Christians who think that it is morally reprehensible to act in defense of self and family. What do you think?
My two cents worth: Since it is moral to preserve one’s life, it is immoral for a Christian to do otherwise. :smilewinkgrin:
Following Tomas Aquinas' logic:
1. Natural law dictates that it is normal to preserve one’s life.
2. Since it is a principle of natural law, it is therefore moral to preserve one's life.
3. Since it is moral to preserve one’s life, it is therefore lawful to defend one’s life.
4. Therefore, self-defense is a moral act and lawful act.
It seems that there are quite a few peacenik Christians who think that it is morally reprehensible to act in defense of self and family. What do you think?
My two cents worth: Since it is moral to preserve one’s life, it is immoral for a Christian to do otherwise. :smilewinkgrin: