• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Is Lordship Salvation a misnomer?

Status
Not open for further replies.

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Originally posted by John Ellwood Taylor:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by John of Japan:
The stated doctrine (note carefully my phraseology) of "Lordship salvation" is fairly recent, to the best of my knowledge. I took a class from Arend Ten Pas in 1971 at BJU where he taught this. John MacArthur was influenced by Ten Pas, and has his book in the bibliography of The Gospel According to Jesus. I've never seen the doctrine stated explicitly (note carefully my phraseology) in anything before the 1970's.
Ernest Reisinger disagrees with your conclusion that this teaching is onyl recent (from www.founders.org/FJ13/article1.html)

"Lordship View Is Historic:
Because of the popularity of the Scofield Bible and Dispensational teaching the Scriptural Lordship doctrine has fallen upon hard times, having been largely forgotten by the majority of fundamentalist churches. However, we must never forget that Lordship salvation has been espoused by all the historic creeds and confessions, and by such note-worthy theological giants as John Calvin, John Owen, John Bunyan, John Brown, John Murray, and thank God, embraced by many respected recent scholars and theologians, such as, Louis Berkhof, James M. Boise, John Gertsner, R. B. Kuiper, James I. Packer, A. W. Pink, R. C. Sproul and the late Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones." [/QB]</font>[/QUOTE]Hello, John.

This is a very broad statement, that "Lordship salvation has been espoused by all the historic creeds and confessions," and all of these 13 men of history. I've read works by many of these men, including Berkhof's systematic theology, books by Packer and Sproul and some of the old guys. I don't remember ANY of them defining salvation like John MacArthur and the other modern LS advocates do, except for Stott and Packer (who wrote MacArthur's foreward). I'd have to read quotes by these men before I believe that they taught what MacArthur does in The Gospel According to Jesus.

There is an article in Bib Sac (Jan-March, 1990) by Thomas G. Lewellen, "Has Lordship Salvation Been Taught throughout Church History?" Granted, he says some of the Puritans did believe in LS. So maybe I need to rethink things here.

However, he furthur points out that the Reformers defined "saving faith" differently from LS advocates. He quotes Stott as saying, "We may believe in the deity and the salvation of Christ, and acknowledge ourselves to be sinners in need of his salvation; but this does not make us Christians. We have to make a personal response to Jesus Christ, committing ourselves unreservedly to him as our Savior and Lord." Then he quotes Calvin: "For, as regards justification, faith is something merely passive, bringing nothing of ours to the recovering of God’s favor but receiving from Christ what we lack." These are two different views.
 

EdSutton

New Member
Originally posted by whatever:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by EdSutton:
Whatever-
I agree- great name! Anywho-
I guess we agree on this, but I'll double check to make sure. Isn't this exactly what is taught in Scripture, especially in I John? And more particularly I John 1:6- 2:7? That's how I read it anyway.
Second question: Apart from the Lord Jesus Christ, would you not agree that we should basically pattern our lives after the righteous saints of Scripture? I await your response
type.gif
to the two questions, to be sure we are basically on the same wave-length.
thumbs.gif
Thanks.
In His grace,
Ed
wave.gif
Yes, I think we agree on those two questions. </font>[/QUOTE]OK, then, the first part is a given; On the second part, I think should go with the person, for a model that Scripture calls righteous or just.

Lemme' look- David, the murderer, the man after God's own heart. I dunno. I'll try again. I got it-

Noah! Naw, first thing he did off the ark was got drunk.

Jacob- name means 'chiseler' or thief- Ripped off his father-in-law, deceived his own father, and ripped off his brother, to boot. Man, this is hard. Some of these saints ain't too saintly, 'pears to me. Let me look a bit more in the Bible and I'll get back to you- Wait! Hang on! - -

I GOT it I got da' man! Best example I can find! He's called righteous or just, not once, not twice, but three times! That is the one I want. The Biblical saint of saints- Three times Scripture tells of his righteousness. So I'll suggest him as the ultimate role model from the Bible.
-My Hero-- is LOT!

In His grace,
Ed
 

EdSutton

New Member
Originally posted by StraightAndNarrow:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by JackRUS:
My two problems with LS is that...

1)What is the percentage of lordship over ourselves that we must give up in order to be saved, and where is the number found in Scripture? (If it's 100%, then the doctrine falls flat on it's face since we all sin.)

2)God does not play 'Let's Make A Deal' (you give Me something, and I'll give you something) with people. And that or any other 'deal' is no where to be found (thank God!) in the Gospel. End of argument on that one alone.
Bad news. The Biblical answer is 100%. Basically, what you'rer saying is you want to be saved but you want to go on living as you did before. I'm afraid God won't accept your deal with Him. It's not the gospel.

Mat 6:24 No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
Mat 6:25 Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?

Mat 6:33 But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
</font>[/QUOTE]OK, S&N, which one of these two things are you claiming-

That you are perfect, and you have given all (you did make the claim for 100%, you remember) and are beyond sin? Since, obviously, if and when one does sin, he or she ain't hit that 100% thing, yet.

Or are you claiming to be usaved at worst, and unsure at best? I don't get it, so I can use a little help, here! YOu know, inquiring minds, and all that.

In His grace,
Ed
 

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Originally posted by EdSutton:

I GOT it I got da' man! Best example I can find! He's called righteous or just, not once, not twice, but three times! That is the one I want. The Biblical saint of saints- Three times Scripture tells of his righteousness. So I'll suggest him as the ultimate role model from the Bible.
-My Hero-- is LOT!

In His grace,
Ed
laugh.gif
laugh.gif
 

ituttut

New Member
Originally posted by John of Japan:
Originally posted by ituttut:

What is Lordship salvation. Paul tells us in the first chapter of every Epistle he writes to the Gentile – ”Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.” Through the blood of our Lord Jesus Christ we are saved by the Grace of God. We go to the Father through our Lord. There is no other way to salvation.

Christian faith, ituttut

Hi, ituttut. Now your name, I'm puzzled by. Do you tut tut at people or are you descended from King Tut? But no doubt there is a deeper meaning!
Much deeper. Some here, and on other boards by private message have asked. It is an acronym for spreading the Word of God, by the “grace commission”. I Tell U Truth Then U Tell.


I did carefully read your post on page 3, and this one, and I believe we are in agreement. I'm still trying to digest everything, and it is flying so fast I'm not keeping up. For sure, thanks for pointing out the Bib Sac article from 1986. I looked it up on my Theological Journal disk, and plan to read it all.

Thanks for reading and have noticed we are not too far apart in some things.


One thing I have learned from this discussion is that there may be as many definitions of LS as there are people on the Baptist Board!! As MikeinGhana wrote on page 3, there is an area of semantics here. Some of you are hearing me say something I'm not meaning, and vice versa all around!

I heard your question and tried to answer, but am not doing too well. I’ll try another route via the Gospel of John, and the Epistles to the Gentile of Paul. Lordship worship cannot be proved error by using Acts 2 salvation for the Jew.

As you may have noticed in almost all my posts I try to stress the gospel of Christ from heaven, which until seen is hard to take, and foreign to what we have been taught through the years. It is not all that different from what all we Baptist and a few others believe. It scares people; it did me when I saw it. I believe like most Baptists, but without knowing they insist the Christian has to do something to stay in good standing. I believe this is what Lordship worship does. But it is understood that He is our Lord Jesus Christ.

As disciples of Jesus Christ we must decide what gospel we are to follow. Do we follow that of John the Baptist which John, Jesus, Peter, and the others preached to their brethren, or do we follow the gospel of Paul, which Christ from heaven gave to Paul for we Gentiles?

It is in the secret that applies to us. Where can the Gentile and the Jew today find what is the gospel, and explain it to us? Most find this gospel in the Gospel of John, which is not the first writings of what Jesus said of things that today apply to us.

John is plain to us and then we come to Paul. How do we know Paul knows what he is talking about? When did he know and who told him. Luke tells us in Acts, with confirmation of Ananias, and Paul tells us in his Epistles. If we don’t believe him, there are two earthly Apostles that will prove us wrong. Peter says in his second Epistle, the latter part of verse 3, that we had better listen to him.

The other? The Apostle John that was allowed to linger. Usually the first gospel children can understand is in the gospel of John. I notice you understood at the early age of 4. I was 5 years behind you being saved at the age of 9. John 3:16 is worded for the young to come. Can we read John and not believe the gospel of Paul? This wording should be “Can we read Paul and not believe the gospel of John.”

John’s gospel is of Paul’s, written circa 30 years after Paul’s death. The words John speaks are the words of Jesus, but we know not one person had any idea of what Jesus was talking about while he was on earth. Scripture soundly affirms this. John was only allowed to write his Books after the death of Paul, and after the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple. Peter and John attest to the wisdom Christ revealed to Paul. It is in Paul that we grow


The article ituttut mentioned, by Livingston Blauvelt, Jr., has this definition of LS: "What is lordship salvation? This is the view that for salvation a person must trust Jesus Christ as his Savior from sin and must also commit himself to Christ as Lord of his life, submitting to His sovereign authority" (p. 37). This is exactly the definition I have given it since I first heard Ten Pas teaching in 1972.

The article goes on to say, "This teaching is false because it subtly adds works to the clear and simple condition for salvation set forth in the Word of God. An unbeliever, to avail himself of the salvation offered in Christ, must only accept Him as his own personal Savior, believing that His death for sin on the cross was final and sufficient forever. This is not to minimize the importance of urging a soon committal to the sovereign authority of Jesus Christ. Of course it is recognized that many people may 'say' they have faith (James 2:14) but have no genuine conversion. Mere verbal assent or mental acquiescence to the fact of Christ’s death, without any conviction of personal sin, is inadequate. That kind of so-called faith is pious pretense" (ibid).

I agree with this assessment by Blauvelt. Bedtime approaches here in Japan. I wish you all a fond, "Oyasumi nasai," rest well.
sleeping_2.gif
Back to your question of “Is there really such thing as Lordship Salvation?”. John 3:16-18 is a good way to disprove for we read ”For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
17. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
18. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.”


It is God that saves; the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, and through Christ Jesus our sins are forgiven? We have God’s salvation through The Son, Jesus Christ. Many Baptists are Calvinistic (Calvinist & Armenian) finding they are to hold on, retaining their salvation, or the need to persevere. This can be found in Lordship worship.

Christian faith, ituttut
 

whatever

New Member
Originally posted by EdSutton:
OK, then, the first part is a given; On the second part, I think should go with the person, for a model that Scripture calls righteous or just.

Lemme' look- David, the murderer, the man after God's own heart. I dunno. I'll try again. I got it-

Noah! Naw, first thing he did off the ark was got drunk.

Jacob- name means 'chiseler' or thief- Ripped off his father-in-law, deceived his own father, and ripped off his brother, to boot. Man, this is hard. Some of these saints ain't too saintly, 'pears to me. Let me look a bit more in the Bible and I'll get back to you- Wait! Hang on! - -

I GOT it I got da' man! Best example I can find! He's called righteous or just, not once, not twice, but three times! That is the one I want. The Biblical saint of saints- Three times Scripture tells of his righteousness. So I'll suggest him as the ultimate role model from the Bible.
-My Hero-- is LOT!

In His grace,
Ed
Well, I suppose you could aspire to reach the level of tormenting your soul with the lawless deeds that you see and hear;

OR

You could pick a better example.

Hebrews 13:7 - "Remember your leaders, those who spoke to you the word of God. Consider the outcome of their way of life, and imitate their faith."

(How did Lot's life turn out?)

3 John 1:11 - "Beloved, do not imitate evil but imitate good. Whoever does good is from God; whoever does evil has not seen God."

2 Timothy 1:13 - "Follow the pattern of the sound words that you have heard from me, in the faith and love that are in Christ Jesus."

On the other hand, Lot got by with his disobedience so maybe you will too. This does bring up a question though, one that is important for the assurance of our salvation. How much disobedience can we get away with and still be a believer?
 

MikeinGhana

New Member
How much disobedience can we get away with and still be a believer?

All of it! But watch out for the chastening hand of God. You will not be glad you disobeyed! We are kept by the power of God, not our obedience. A believer that continues in sin and disobedience does not lose his or her salvation, period.
 

EdSutton

New Member
Originally posted by MikeinGhana:
QUOTE]Wow, thanks Mike. I do want to grow in grace! ;)
Send me a copy of your birth certificate first. You must be of age before you can have it.
saint.gif
[/QB][/QUOTE]

No, you'd have to be 'of age' to get it from the guv'mint! Your parents can get a copy, legally, and give it to you where you then "have it" as "a FREE GIFT"! Why, I'd almost even say it woulds be "ABSOLUTELY FREE!"(c)!
thumbs.gif
laugh.gif
laugh.gif
laugh.gif

Ed

[ March 02, 2006, 10:38 AM: Message edited by: EdSutton ]
 

EdSutton

New Member
Originally posted by MikeinGhana:
How much disobedience can we get away with and still be a believer?

All of it! But watch out for the chastening hand of God. You will not be glad you disobeyed! We are kept by the power of God, not our obedience. A believer that continues in sin and disobedience does not lose his or her salvation, period.
Amen, Brother! Preach it! This is, IMO, exactly what Scripture teaches. Granted, my advice is merely my opinion, here. But consider the price of this advice. Like as my eternal life was bestowed on me by Christ, this advice was and is "ABSOLUTELY FREE!"(c)
Ed
 

Tom Butler

New Member
Mike in Ghana said:
A believer that continues in sin and disobedience does not lose his or her salvation, period
At the same time, it is entirely possible that the so-called believer never had salvation to lose in the first place.


Tom B
 

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Originally posted by EdSutton:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by MikeinGhana:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Wow, thanks Mike. I do want to grow in grace! ;)
Send me a copy of your birth certificate first. You must be of age before you can have it.
saint.gif
</font>[/QUOTE]No, you'd have to be 'of age' to get it from the guv'mint! Your parents can get a copy, legally, and give it to you where you then "have it" as "a FREE GIFT"! Why, I'd almost even say it would be "ABSOLUTELY FREE!"(c)!
thumbs.gif
laugh.gif
laugh.gif
laugh.gif

Ed [/QB]</font>[/QUOTE]Can I ride on a big airplane and go get it? Will it be free, or will you pay for it? :D
 

John of Japan

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Originally posted by EdSutton:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by MikeinGhana:
How much disobedience can we get away with and still be a believer?

All of it! But watch out for the chastening hand of God. You will not be glad you disobeyed! We are kept by the power of God, not our obedience. A believer that continues in sin and disobedience does not lose his or her salvation, period.
Amen, Brother! Preach it! This is, IMO, exactly what Scripture teaches. Granted, my advice is merely my opinion, here. But consider the price of this advice. Like as my eternal life was bestowed on me by Christ, this advice was and is "ABSOLUTELY FREE!"(c)
Ed
</font>[/QUOTE]AMEN!
thumbs.gif
thumbs.gif
thumbs.gif
 

EdSutton

New Member
Originally posted by Tom Butler:
Mike in Ghana said:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr /> A believer that continues in sin and disobedience does not lose his or her salvation, period
At the same time, it is entirely possible that the so-called believer never had salvation to lose in the first place.


Tom B
</font>[/QUOTE]Good point, or no?? How about an example from the Bible, so I get where you are coming from. Aside from the self-righteous, that is. Although I didn't see anything about "so-called" in Mike's post.
Ed
 

EdSutton

New Member
Originally posted by whatever:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by EdSutton:
OK, then, the first part is a given; On the second part, I think should go with the person, for a model that Scripture calls righteous or just.

Lemme' look- David, the murderer, the man after God's own heart. I dunno. I'll try again. I got it-

Noah! Naw, first thing he did off the ark was got drunk.

Jacob- name means 'chiseler' or thief- Ripped off his father-in-law, deceived his own father, and ripped off his brother, to boot. Man, this is hard. Some of these saints ain't too saintly, 'pears to me. Let me look a bit more in the Bible and I'll get back to you- Wait! Hang on! - -

I GOT it I got da' man! Best example I can find! He's called righteous or just, not once, not twice, but three times! That is the one I want. The Biblical saint of saints- Three times Scripture tells of his righteousness. So I'll suggest him as the ultimate role model from the Bible.
-My Hero-- is LOT!

In His grace,
Ed
Well, I suppose you could aspire to reach the level of tormenting your soul with the lawless deeds that you see and hear;

OR

You could pick a better example.

Hebrews 13:7 - "Remember your leaders, those who spoke to you the word of God. Consider the outcome of their way of life, and imitate their faith."

(How did Lot's life turn out?)

3 John 1:11 - "Beloved, do not imitate evil but imitate good. Whoever does good is from God; whoever does evil has not seen God."

2 Timothy 1:13 - "Follow the pattern of the sound words that you have heard from me, in the faith and love that are in Christ Jesus."

On the other hand, Lot got by with his disobedience so maybe you will too. This does bring up a question though, one that is important for the assurance of our salvation. How much disobedience can we get away with and still be a believer?
</font>[/QUOTE]Hey! I'M being consistent! I ask question; you answer; I give best example I can find, from Scripture! I could try to find a better example, I guess, but it is extremely difficult, as I read Scripture, anyhow. "For there is not a just (or righteous) man on earth who does good And does not sin." (Eccl.7:20, cp. I Ki. 8:46; c.f. Rom.3:10) is the general claim of Scripture. God allows only 10 exceptions to this rule, as far as I can find, and if (BIG if, as to number) memory serves, in the pronouncements from Scripture. One of these was Noah, from whom I'm descended, BTW. (I don't know about all of your ancestors, but I go back to Adam and Noah- I'm descended from a crooked farmer and a drunken sailor!) We already covered him. Another was the Lord Jesus, himself. John (not of Japan, FTR) is one (Mk. 6:20), but I ain't too sure I want to follow his example. He got so into his thing you could say he lost his head over it! Barnabas, who fell out with Paul, and gave nepotism a bad name, is another. I dunno'. Who would YOU suggest? Oh, yeah I think Solomon may be a good one, with his wisdom, but I can't see why (if he was the wisest man ever to live) ANYONE would want a thousand mother-in-laws. Let's go to Hebrews. I'll try here. Samson? Don't think so- don't like real long hair in the first place. Gideon? Rahab, the harlot? Sorry bunch all, if you ask me, and the sorriest of all is old Lot. POINT is, God DIDN'T ask me; HE said it; HE picked 'em; and HE never asked me one word about it. And as S&N suggested, I ain't arguing with Jesus- God the Son.

I'm not sure Lot is MY role model for 'getting by with something', either. Lemme' see. He was the Mayor of Sodom, which was a very large city at that time, apparently. He got "run out of office"; He got dragged out of town; He got to watch his city, his home, and probably even some of his own children perish, like in Hiroshima or 9-11; (I believe I did Hear something about his wife bein' a pillar in the community, or sumpin' like that anyways.) He was then seen "gettin' out of Dodge", to save his own skin, kinda like "Ol' Sammy-ben-runnin'" over in the Middle East, then we see him livin' in a cave, like "Ol' Sammy-in-hidin"; Letting his daughters getting him just drunk enough to put aside his morals, (assuming he had any left, in the first place) then having incest and fathering children with not one but the only two daughters out of five he had left on the earth. I dunno'- seems like a wonderful bit of "getting away with it" maybe if you are comparing it to a root canal without anasthetic, and an IRS audit at the same time.

This brings us to point three- You asked:
"How much disobedience can we get away with and still be a believer? " And we have really hit the nail here, haven't we? Just how good do we have to be? How much leeway are we given to 'judge' who is saved? (Why is it that I usually see the criteria Scripture shows, IMO, used more to tear down than build up?

Mike is right! His recent post was 'dead on'. God is not grading on a curve; but he is 'grading' us on our works. I believe the categories include gold, siver, jewels, wood, hay, and stubble. Anyone else notice there was no mention of sin, here? Guess the blood musta covered it all. Affect our relationship, as a believer? Not in the least; Affect out fellowship? To the max! Let's not confuse:
1.) Salvation and Service
2.) 'Come to me' and 'follow after me'
3.) Free gift of eternal life with earned rewards
4.) The Whole 'housecleansing' with the 'washing the feet'
5.) Most of all let's not confuse "Do!" with "DONE!"
In His grace,
Ed
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Originally posted by John of Japan:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by OldRegular:

In the above Scripture we see that both Paul and Jesus Christ tell us that “true believers” are indwelt with the Holy Spirit.

Jesus Christ in the above passages tells us that the Holy Spirit will guide us, as a new creation in Jesus Christ, into all truth and will testify of Jesus Christ. If the Holy Spirit guides us into all truth He will teach us to love Jesus Christ and will also teach us that Jesus Christ is Lord. If the Holy Spirit testifies of Jesus Christ that will also include the knowledge that Jesus Christ is Lord.

Anyone who professes to be saved and yet denies the Lordship of Jesus Christ is either seriously deluded or is not indwelt by the Holy Spirit.
I believe you are missing the point, OldRegular. I agree with what you have written here, but LS is not about after salvation but the means of salvation. </font>[/QUOTE]Perhaps you misunderstand what those who believe in Lordship Salvation actually believe.
 

JackRUS

New Member
Originally posted by OldRegular:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by JackRUS:
Mt. 25 speaks of Jesus speaking to live people here on Earth after His second coming. It's not a description of the Great White Throne Judgement of Rev. 20 like Catholics and religionists insist.

They are judged on how they treated Jews (His brethren) and Christians during the Tribulation to see if they get to go on into the Millenniun.

Why is it that dispensational nonsense gets woven into nearly every thread on this Forum? By the way why are there Christians on earth during the GRrreat Tribulation? I thought they all got "snatched" away. </font>[/QUOTE]Who said they are Christians?

Are you then arguing that people get to heaven based on how they treated others? You know, by their works?

It's amazing how some people will even deny the faith while standing up for Preterism.
 

MikeinGhana

New Member
Tom, you are 100% right. If a man was not a believer that changes the question doesn't it? A true believer can not lose his salvation. In fact God chooses to remember his sin no more! That is forever.
 

JackRUS

New Member
Originally posted by StraightAndNarrow:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by JackRUS:
My two problems with LS is that...

1)What is the percentage of lordship over ourselves that we must give up in order to be saved, and where is the number found in Scripture? (If it's 100%, then the doctrine falls flat on it's face since we all sin.)

2)God does not play 'Let's Make A Deal' (you give Me something, and I'll give you something) with people. And that or any other 'deal' is no where to be found (thank God!) in the Gospel. End of argument on that one alone.
Bad news. The Biblical answer is 100%. Basically, what you'rer saying is you want to be saved but you want to go on living as you did before. I'm afraid God won't accept your deal with Him. It's not the gospel.

Mat 6:24 No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
Mat 6:25 Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?

Mat 6:33 But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
</font>[/QUOTE]100% huh? Well then I have some bad news for you (and everyone else). We're all going to hell then since no one that ever lived, including Paul (Rom. 7:17-25), to thet standard.

Wouldn't you say that commiting sin is not full submission to God?
 

JackRUS

New Member
OldRegular wrote:
Anyone who professes to be saved and yet denies the Lordship of Jesus Christ is either seriously deluded or is not indwelt by the Holy Spirit.
No one here is saying that. This doctrine of LS is hard to nail down for some folks. It says that one must make a deal with God to completely surrender lordship of their lives to Christ as part of a sort of contract agreement to obtain salvation.

It is grace through works re-packaged for Christian consumption.
 

EdSutton

New Member
Originally posted by JackRUS:
OldRegular wrote: </font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Anyone who professes to be saved and yet denies the Lordship of Jesus Christ is either seriously deluded or is not indwelt by the Holy Spirit.
No one here is saying that. This doctrine of LS is hard to nail down for some folks. It says that one must make a deal with God to completely surrender lordship of their lives to Christ as part of a sort of contract agreement to obtain salvation.

It is grace through works re-packaged for Christian consumption.
</font>[/QUOTE]JackRUS! You got it right!
type.gif
thumbs.gif
thumbs.gif

Ed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top