Originally posted by BobRyan:
God has "predestined ALL to become conformed to the image of his Son" -- ALL that He foreknew - and of course Arminians believe He "foreknew ALL things".
Romans 8:28-30
28And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. 29For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. 30And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.
I don't see in this passage where God has "predestined ALL to become conformed to the image of his Son." Looking back to verse 28 it seems to identify the predestined as "those who love God" & "those who are called according to his purpose."
ALL that He foreknew - and of course Arminians believe He "foreknew ALL things".
Here you seem to base that God foreknew all people based on the fact that God foreknew all things. But does this square with scripture? In Amos 3:2 God says "
You only have I known of all the families of the earth..," and again in Matthew 7:23 "And then will I declare to them, '
I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.'" If you are saying that God foreknew everyone, how do you expain these verses?
The thread topic asks "Is predestination disturbing?" One could just as well ask "Is Romans 8:29-30 disturbing?" Because it clearly teaches predestination. The controversy boils down not to what is meant by 'predestined,' but rather what is meant by 'foreknew.'