HisWitness
New Member
In order to show that something is OUT of context, you have to show where it is IN context. Revelation 12 is IN context with a description of a great red dragon in Revelation 12:3. This dragon is said to be the accuser of the brethren, which fits with Zech 3:1 where Satan stood before the Lord to accuse Joshua, it fits with Job chapters 1-2, and the description of the dragon itself in Revelation 12:9 SPECIFICALLY calls the dragon SATAN and specifically calls the dragon the DEVIL, and uses the singular pronoun "HE" and "HIS" that indicates all of the descriptions of dragon, serpent, Satan and devil are all referring to the same being.
You are now trying to change the issue from claiming that Satan is Adam into one about whether there was a fallen angel. I personally do not believe that angels and cherubs are the same thing, but the Bible still describes Satan as operating AS an "angel of light" in 2 Cor 11. And it hardly fits that a "high priest" is the "god of this world" who is capable of blinding the minds of those around the world. You are giving even the most sinister priest way too much credit.
And nobody said that the king of Tyre was not a man, but often times in the Bible a prophesy or description of a different event or person is described in the middle of a general text. This is done all throughout the Psalms and Isaiah with regards to prophecies about Christ. What you have IGNORED is that Ezekiel 28 said that the person described in verse 13 was IN THE GARDEN OF EDEN.
Eden was sealed and guarded after God removed Adam and Eve. Gen 3:24. So even if the King of Tyre have traveled back in time a thousand years+ to when this actually happened, he still wouldn't have been able to get into the Garden of Eden, so this part of Ezekiel 28 is CLEARLY NOT ABOUT THE KING OF TYRE.
Even though there are great differences among believers on many doctrines, there is at least agreement of a few things. However,you are out in far left field all by yourself on this one.
Peter was Satan,Dragon was Satan,God was Satan in the old testament,High priest was Satan(false angel of light)
the point is that the Satan is always a word which describes other men or kingdoms or empires being the Adversaries to God and his church
the prophecies of Christ in the old testament are pointing to that time that he would come--and we have the plain evidence in scripture of his coming in the flesh that is written for us the full account of his birth and everything.
now you say that a few texts out of the whole old testament maybe is a double prophecy of a man and of a entity called Satan(your view)BUT i ask you where is it in scripture pointing out that event of that entity fell from heaven and sinned--there are ample scriptures in reference to Christ coming which the prophecies foretold.
But where is the scripture evidence of the Angel sinning against God and the whole event taking place in scripture--its NOT there--now if a prophecy is telling about someone or an event just as Christ--where is the proof in the complete scriptures we have of that even happening.its clearly there with Christ--- BUT NOT THERE WITH YOUR ANGEL SINNING VIEW:wavey::wavey: