Heavenly Pilgrim
New Member
Steaver: Spirit testifies with spirit (Ro 8)
HP: This answer shows that God testifies to our Spirit, but not how ‘we’ exhibit‘ or exercise faith. Steaver needs to try again to answer Webdog's questions directly.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Steaver: Spirit testifies with spirit (Ro 8)
I did answer it. It is trust in something or someone. It's hoping for something that there is evidence for and is not seen. Better yet, tell me how you exhibit faith and then tell me if a fetus can do the same.
One exhibits faith by forming intents and as such directing ones subsequent action, in accordance to truth. That is something absolutely impossible for an infant to do.
Doesn't the fact that baby John leaped prove that babies are in fact not separated from God? (Spiritually dead).Luk 1:41And it came to pass, that, when Elisabeth heard the salutation of Mary, the babe leaped in her womb; and Elisabeth was filled with the Holy Ghost:
:jesus:
Doesn't the fact that baby John leaped prove that babies are in fact not separated from God? (Spiritually dead).
Doesn't the fact that baby John leaped prove that babies are in fact not separated from God? (Spiritually dead).
HP: Says who? Where is there the slightest indication that anyone or anything outside of our physical finite real of men that God has hemmed us into, can or ever has exercised faith? Where in the world did you ever learn such philosophy?Steaver: "Forming intents" and "action". Ok, tell us why a spirit cannot form intents and take action…...
Faith does not require a physical body to exist. Having a physical body allows faith to express itself in many ways, but the body is not required for saving faith (regeneration). All that is required is the spirit. God calls this spirit the "heart".
HP: You forget that we have learned from discussion. Why are you allowing man’s philosophical reasoning to guide you in the interpretation of the Word of God? ( I am just trying to make us all aware beyond a shadow of a doubt, that everyone uses philosophical means to establish truth in Scripture, stated or implied.Steaver: Rom 10:9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
Please do not let the "confess with thy mouth" cause you to further error that a mouth is nescessary for one to have faith. Then you would have to believe that someone unable to speak could not hear, understand and have faith.
Steaver: Luk 1:41And it came to pass, that, when Elisabeth heard the salutation of Mary, the babe leaped in her womb; and Elisabeth was filled with the Holy Ghost:
Do you still believe God cannot speak to babies in the womb?
HP: Says who? Where is there the slightest indication that anyone or anything outside of our physical finite real of men that God has hemmed us into, can or ever has exercised faith? Where in the world did you ever learn such philosophy?
It always worries me when I see this kind of continual arguing and speculating on one particular subject, as if there is nothing else of worth in the Christian world. It rather points to a problem with that person than with those they are arguing with. I think the question that we ought to begin to ask is not whether infants are being saved, but rather do we have that mind of the child within ourselves of which our Lord was speaking?"Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted , and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven."
When one prays in the Spirit he is still within the realm of being a finite man Steaver.
Ro 10:14 How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?
You failed to address even one solitary issue I actually spoke to you about.
And what is the spirit of a fetus capable of Steaver?
So, you would admit then that a fetus could hear from the moment of conception the Spirit of God and respond to it. That would prove beyond a shadow a doubt then that no man is devoid of the Spirit of God, and that all men, from conception are given every ability to respond to the Holy Spirit. Are we in agreement so far?
Then, you would have to admit that we are indeed not totally corrupted neither is our spirit separated from God in conception, right?
Rom 5:12¶Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:
Rom 6:23For the wages of sin [is] death; but the gift of God [is] eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Do babies die? It is because they are cursed from the original sin of Adam. Do not confuse Eze 18 (personal sins) with the original curse caused by Adam's sin and passed on to all through the blood or conception.
Quote:
Is God the author of man's soul, does God create children of the Devil.
God creates all men. Children of wrath are those who reject God's grace.
Quote:
If a child is born sinful, depraved, apart from God then they are children of the Devil by default according to your logic.
Not according to logic, according to the scriptures. God must redeem ALL from death and damnation.
Quote:
So therefore you must conclude that God creates hell bound babies because they are cursed with their parents sins traced all the way back to Adam and Eve.
If that is what you want to call them, but yes, God must redeem ALL from the curse, including babies.
Quote:
Is that what you believe, because that is what your implying that scripture teaches and that is just not scripturally true
It is written. What else can I tell you. I believe what causes one to error in this topic is not being able to understand the difference between the curse of sin and being held personally accountable for transgressions of God's law. Both need grace and mercy.
We cannot help but sin from birth, this is the curse. Also, we can learn right and wrong and choose to do wrong, this is personal sins. Jesus' blood covers both.
JSM, weren't you a calvinist at one point? Your recent contributions seem to go against that doctrine. Have you left the "dark side"?Steaver Wrote:
You said babies die as a result of original sin, yet if all babies are born with original sin would they not all die then?
If death is a result of original sin and if the damning sin is rejection of Christ how is it that you conclude that babies or infants right out of the womb that die are guilty of rejecting Christ?
Which is it, damned for rejecting Christ as infants or damned because God has cursed the infant with their fathers sins?
How does an infant have faith, I believe that you implied that they could have faith in a post in response to H.P.?
As for Ezek. 18 there is no mistake, God does not hold my fathers sins against me and my sins against him, the nature of sin is choice to transgress God laws. James clearly indicates that sin is something developed not inherited. If it is inherited then it is no longer choice, if not choice then are we to conclude that God made me sinful, because no matter how you try to move it around, either God made my soul or He didn't, if he did, did He make me with a tarnished soul because of something my father did (sinned).
The bottom line is that sin has cursed man with death, physical and spiritual.
You said babies die as a result of original sin, yet if all babies are born with original sin would they not all die then?
If death is a result of original sin and if the damning sin is rejection of Christ how is it that you conclude that babies or infants right out of the womb that die are guilty of rejecting Christ?
Which is it, damned for rejecting Christ as infants or damned because God has cursed the infant with their fathers sins?
How does an infant have faith, I believe that you implied that they could have faith in a post in response to H.P.?
As for Ezek. 18 there is no mistake, God does not hold my fathers sins against me and my sins against him, the nature of sin is choice to transgress God laws. James clearly indicates that sin is something developed not inherited. If it is inherited then it is no longer choice, if not choice then are we to conclude that God made me sinful, because no matter how you try to move it around, either God made my soul or He didn't, if he did, did He make me with a tarnished soul because of something my father did (sinned).
....either God made my soul or He didn't, if he did, did He make me with a tarnished soul because of something my father did (sinned).
The bottom line is that sin has cursed man with death, physical and spiritual.