• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Is there a retitle suggestion for Calvinism and Arminianism

Status
Not open for further replies.

jbh28

Active Member
First to suggest I do not believe in our triune God is simply an attack on me and is typical of all Calvinists, they disparage others because they cannot defend their doctrines.
It's ok{edit}, you do it all the time. And no, he suggested that either you didn't believe in the trinity or you were confusing the terms. In other words, you were not being consistent. He wasn't saying that you didn't believe in the trinity. Stop reading in to things others say and cry victim. No one is falling for it. I've have at least 2-3 times asked you a simple question and you refuse to answer it. Instead you cry about me misrepresenting you instead of just asking the question. Grow up!

Folks, God chose you for salvation from the beginning by means of sanctification by the Holy Spirit and faith in the truth. No amount of shuck and jive will alter that truth.
Sorry, but you have been proven wrong over and over and over again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

preacher4truth

Active Member
It's ok hypocrite, you do it all the time. And no, he suggested that either you didn't believe in the trinity or you were confusing the terms. In other words, you were not being consistent. He wasn't saying that you didn't believe in the trinity. Stop reading in to things others say and cry victim. No one is falling for it. I've have at least 2-3 times asked you a simple question and you refuse to answer it. Instead you cry about me misrepresenting you instead of just asking the question. Grow up!


Sorry, but you have been proven wrong over and over and over again.

Seriously brother, do you ever think van is going to come around to truth theologically?

I am surprised that you've gone down into the arena of the tactics of a certain tribe of non-cals and have used pejoratives. You're way above that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

jbh28

Active Member
Seriously brother, do you ever think van is going to come around to truth theologically?

I am surprised that you've gone down into the arena of the tactics of a certain tribe of non-cals and have used pejoratives. You're way above that.

I'm simply pointing out how he talks out of both sides of his mouth. He's very quick to say people are "attacking" him, but he'll turn right around and attack others. He said in another thread that attacking others shouldn't be done. I'm trying to let him know how often he's actually guilty of it. This particular instance, he took something beyond what the poster said to make it appear as if it was an attack, which it wasn't.

However, you are correct in that I shouldn't have used a derogatory name. Of which I have removed from my previous post. I shouldn't do that which I'm saying is wrong. I guess I was being hypocritical.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Amy.G

New Member
I think both groups need to have the same name.

I ---I'm
R---right
Y---you
A---are
W--wrong



:laugh::tongue3::laugh:
 

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I think both groups need to have the same name.

I ---I'm
R---right
Y---you
A---are
W--wrong



:laugh::tongue3::laugh:



I thought about IRA and ROTH

I'm - Always - Right

Righteous - Only - Through - Him
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Reply to Old Regular

I believe "Sir" that you are "eisegeting" more than "exegeting". How else would God the Father choose anyone for Salvation except "in HIM, that is Jesus Christ"? After all He, Jesus Christ, is the one and only Redeemer. He, Jesus Christ, tells us: I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

You persist in saying that God chose Jesus Christ as Redeemer. That statement in itself is meaningless at best and nonsense at worst. Salvation is the work of the Triune Godhead, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit! God the Father chooses, God the Son, Incarnate as Jesus Christ, pays the penalty for sin, God the Holy Spirit applies the work of Jesus Christ to those chosen in Jesus Christ for Salvation!

Sir, you can charge me with eisegesis till the cows come home, why not stick with refuting my actual position?

Next,you offer an alternate understanding of what "in Him" adds to Ephesians 1:4. Apparently you think God chose foreseen individuals and put this "folks" into the body of Christ, before Christ died on the cross. Question for you, Sir, where were the OT saints confined to "Abraham's bosom" before Christ died? How come they were not in "Christ's bosom?" Your position is a fiction.

Yes I do persist in saying God chose Christ to be His Lamb, and hence His Redeemer. Not to put too fine a point on it, but Christ means Anointed One and when a person is anointed that means they have been chosen for some purpose which the anointing prepares them for.

Certainly salvation is the work of God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. But scripture provides us with some specific details, such as the Holy Spirit sets us apart in Christ based on God crediting our faith as righteousness.

Sir, to say God chose Christ as His Redeemer is neither meaningless nor nonsense, because He did and He did it before the foundation of the world.

You sidestepped the idea that if God chose you for salvation by means of faith in the truth, then our election occurs during our lifetime, after we put our faith in Christ. You seem to deny 2 Thessalonians 2:13.
 

Van

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Reply to Slander

I wasn't attacking you.
To question whether I believe in the Trinity is an attack.


Is it not you that have shown the desire to shift blame, claim the high ground of being attacked, and that Calvinist thinkers "run away."
No that is what Calvinists do. They say I want to shift blame, or claim the high ground, when all I want is to discuss our differing positions and not my behavior.

Van, I have posted the meaning of the word, and I have posted the entire verse with the Greek in English script followed by the meaning of each word.

First "en" is used about ten different ways in the Bible. One of those ways is to say "by means of". This is how "en" is used in 2 Thessalonians 2:13. That is why every major translation translates "en" as "by" or "through" in 2 Thessalonians 2:13. This is the truth you have run away from.

I have shown the practical application of "en" that fits the definition. You want it to mean whatever you determine is right in your own eyes.
No that is what you are doing by abandoning every translation. I am using the meaning that every modern translation uses, by or through.

Here are some cut and paste Greek Grammar sources:
"En (Dative)

1. Spatial/Sphere: in (and various other translations)
2. Temporal: in, within, when, while, during
3. Association (often close personal relationship): with
4. Cause: because of
5. Instrumental: by, with
6. Reference/Respect: with respect to/with reference to
7. Manner: with
8. Thing Possessed: with (in the sense of which possesses)
9. Standard (=Dative of Rule): according to the standard of
10. As an equivalent for eis (with verbs of notion)"

"En (#1722 evn): En only takes the dative case. When en modifies a noun, the noun will be in the dative case and the preposition will be understood in one of these ten ways:

1. Sphere: in
E.g., “I hope that we are made manifest also in your consciences” (2 Cor. 5:11).

2. Spatial: in
E.g., “there was a woman in the city who was a sinner” (Luke 7:37).

3. Temporal: in, while, during
E.g., “in the days of Herod the king” (Matt. 2:1; cp. Matt. 11:22).

4. Association: with
E.g., “the Father is in me and I am in the Father” (John 10:38; cp. John 14:20).

5. Causal: because of
E.g., “And they glorified God in me” (Gal. 1:24). ESV: “And they glorified God
because of me.” (Cp. Acts 7:29; Heb. 10:10).

6. Instrumental: by, with
E.g., “[Will not the King] consider whether he is able with ten thousand men to
oppose the one coming against him with twenty thousand” (Luke 14:31).

7. Agency/Means: by means of
Greek Word List 624
E.g., “the Pharisees said, ‘He casts out demons by the prince of demons’” (Matt.9:34).

8. Thing possessed: with, which possesses
E.g., “there was in their synagogue a man with an unclean spirit” (Mark 1:23; cp.Eph. 6:2).

9. Standard/Dative of Rule: according to the standard of
E.g., “as to the righteousness which is in the Law, [I was] found blameless” (Phil.3:6; cp. 2 Tim. 3:16).

10. Used in place of eis with verbs of motion
E.g., “to turn… the disobedient to the wisdom of the just” (Luke 1:17; 9:46)."

QED The Calvinist view of 2 Thessalonians 2:13 as expressed by Agedman is mistaken, "en" is used as "by means of"
 

agedman

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
The Calvinist view of 2 Thessalonians 2:13 as expressed by Agedman is mistaken, "en" is used as "by means of"

First, let's clear up this contention over whether I attacked you or not. Since you think I (did) do, I apologize.

It was an honest question that you mistook. It was my responsibility to state the question so that you would not assume a defensive stance. Apparently I did not, and that is again, my fault.

As I ponder about your post, I questioned why you would post something that so obviously supported what I have been stating, and you have continued to oppose?

Then, I thought that perhaps in your desiring to hold "en" as showing dynamic (moving) progression rather than a static (non-moving) state, you would grab any thread out of the meaning list and not realize in doing so, it unraveled the whole fabric of your view.



For all who are reading this thread, here is a link giving extensive original and translations of 2 Thessalonians 2:13. What is neat about this link is, if you highlight and copy it into a Word document, the Greek automatically occurs in the Greek Script.

Unfortunately, I don't know how to copy it to the BB or I would have done so here.

http://www.greeknewtestament.com/B53C002.htm#V13



Van.

I have pretty much ignored your "by means of" statements thinking that perhaps you were beginning to realize the view you were holding as mistaken. "By means of" is not what you are assigning it to mean.


As has been the history of this tread, I will illustrate how "by means of" is used within the static placement of "en".

"What proof do yo have that you are a citizen?
Is it because you were merely born a citizen, or is it that you have a certificate of birth?

One proves they are a citizen "by means of" a birth certificate or certificate of citizenship.

In the example of your post “the Pharisees said, ‘He casts out demons by the prince of demons'" the "by" does not refer back to the casting, but to the one who is casting - a noun - "by means of the prince of demons." Because the word (by means of) is directly attached to a following noun, it must be static and not dynamic.

I do so hope you soon recognize your inaccuracy!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DaChaser1

New Member
Sir, you can charge me with eisegesis till the cows come home, why not stick with refuting my actual position?

All of the cals here have been, some using valid Greek exegesis, you have been ignoring it!

Next,you offer an alternate understanding of what "in Him" adds to Ephesians 1:4. Apparently you think God chose foreseen individuals and put this "folks" into the body of Christ, before Christ died on the cross. Question for you, Sir, where were the OT saints confined to "Abraham's bosom" before Christ died? How come they were not in "Christ's bosom?" Your position is a fiction.

Do we even know what exactly Abraham Bosom was referring to?

Yes I do persist in saying God chose Christ to be His Lamb, and hence His Redeemer. Not to put too fine a point on it, but Christ means Anointed One and when a person is anointed that means they have been chosen for some purpose which the anointing prepares them for.

the father chose His Son to come as Jesus and be the messiah, but he was chosen for that task same "time" as he was begotten by the father, which was from eternity past, always has been!


Certainly salvation is the work of God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. But scripture provides us with some specific details, such as the Holy Spirit sets us apart in Christ based on God crediting our faith as righteousness.

the atoning work of the Cross is what merits us favor with god, NOT our faith in jesus, as that ONLY accesses that Grace to be applied towards us, and EVEN that faith is a gift from God!

Sir, to say God chose Christ as His Redeemer is neither meaningless nor nonsense, because He did and He did it before the foundation of the world.

jesus was chosen from eternity to be the messiah sent to be lamb of God, but not set apart by God in the sense that you suggest!


You sidestepped the idea that if God chose you for salvation by means of faith in the truth, then our election occurs during our lifetime, after we put our faith in Christ. You seem to deny 2 Thessalonians 2:13.

basis of our salvation is NOT because God saw us place personal faith in Christ in order to be saved, but due to Him electing to save us first, and That causes us to get saved...

Election is basis of salvation by faith in Christ, NOT faith in Chrsit causing the election to happen!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top