Eternally Grateful
Active Member
I am sorry you misunderstand my point. My point is your opinion is yours. But it can come across as legalistic.I’m sorry you misunderstand my position. I have been as candid as I know how.
I am just saying the words you use “sound”legalistic. I am not saying you areYou continue to confuse me. We appear to be saying the same thing, but then you make the accusation of legalism against me. What if no one “noticed a difference”? Do you give that person assurance of salvation?
Again I do not think you understand what I am saying
If you are discipline them or in authority or they are a close friend yeah you shouldAgain, I don’t declare anyone saved or unsaved. But we must discern if our brethren are struggling to walk after Christ.
If not. Judge not lest you be judged
Yes I amAgain, are you certain you are opposed to Lordship Salvation? We agree, again.
Would you say this to someone not saved or a new babe who does not yet understand what this means?The Apostle Paul commanded us to walk in a manner worthy of our calling. It is biblical to use that language.
I would ask them if they truly trusted Christ and what that means. I would not judge them. I have learned you come in judgment t not in love. You will get a hand in the faceIt is a worth while effort, to be sure. If, however, someone professes Christ and then makes no attempt to follow His commands, to walk in a manner worthy… would you tell them not to worry, their salvation is certain?
It’s pointing people to service not to self. Lordship salvation points to self in my view. What am I doingWell, I don’t understand the difference between pointing people to serving and loving others…. But not in how they are behaving. Isn’t that the same thing?
There is some difference but yes we are pretty much the sameOk, we agree…. Again.
I think we agree far more than disagree. In fact, I don’t really see any doctrinal differences between us… just an objection to using certain words to describe those beliefs.
Peace to you