• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

It's Been Almost 16 Years...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rippon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Why does it need an explanation its could be just the way things happen to buildings in an out-of-control fire or a coincidence.


HankD
Hank, you know better than that. Come on, put your thinking cap on. Use common sense.

The things you said --Oh my imputed righteousness!
 

Covenanter

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
That was my insinuation, yes. After watching the buildings come down, I am convinced that they were brought down on purpose. What sealed the deal for me was the "pancake" motion, coupled with the puffs of smoke that descended as it collapsed. If you watch video footage of the demolition of buildings using explosives, they are identical.

Now, if the buildings were brought down on purpose, then that leaves several options open. The first being that 9/11 was an inside job conspiracy. I personally find no compelling evidence to support this. Rather, I believe that in the face of what was happening, they chose to bring the buildings down in a way that minimized structural damage to the surrounding landscape.

If the fire had continued to burn the way it was going, superheating the metal and causing a collapse, the buildings would have collapsed to one side, rather than pancaking. This would have caused much more damage than simply just pancaking the building. Also, it serves as evidence that the buildings were brought down intentionally, as they didn't collapse to one side as they should have.

As to the why, with the buildings being as tall as they were, it's possible that they thought out this exact scenario. Not terrorism, per se, but a low flying plane accidentally hitting them. Or possibly a catastrophic building fire. Or even a bomb threat.

So why was it not admitted that the buildings were brought down by explosives? And however could the murder of 3,000 civilians be justified to "minimize(d) structural damage to the surrounding landscape."
 

Rippon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
So why was it not admitted that the buildings were brought down by explosives? And however could the murder of 3,000 civilians be justified to "minimize(d) structural damage to the surrounding landscape."
Indeed! Utter madness.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Hank, you know better than that. Come on, put your thinking cap on. Use common sense.

The things you said --Oh my imputed righteousness!
Really trying hard to even image conspiratorial forces at work here.

look, I went though this with the death of my hero JFK, I was in the service at the time. Within months there were a half dozen theories of who killed JFK, within years maybe a dozen. People just refused to believe that LHO acted alone.

It was the MAFIA, it was LBJ, it was the Russians, it was the CIA ...
each theory was iron clad with documents.

So like I said, I am Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome with conspiracy theories.


HankD
 
Last edited:

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Really trying hard to even image conspiratorial forces at work here.

look, I went though this with the death of my hero JFK, I was in the service at the time. Within months there were a half dozen theories of who killed JFK, within years maybe a dozen. People just refused to believe that LHO acted alone.

It was the MAFIA, it was LBJ, it was the Russians, it was the CIA ...
each theory was iron clad with documents.

So like I said, I am Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome with conspiracy theories.


HankD
Yes sir. Modern ballistics have 100% proven there was absolutely nothing magical about the "magic bullet." Conspiracy theorists go out of their way to believe junk.
 

Covenanter

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
21687631_915479561948126_855351618126031539_n.jpg
 

Rippon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Really trying hard to even image [sic] conspiratorial forces at work here
You've swallowed the entire governmental line without due consideration of a whole series of anomalies that day. You've just dismissed them out of hand. You're not a critical thinker.
 

Rippon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Conspiracy theorists go out of their way to believe junk.
Your position is to believe the wildly preposterous government fairy tale. Your far-fetched theory doesn't stand up to the facts that are all too obvious.
 

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator
You've swallowed the entire governmental line without due consideration of a whole series of anomalies that day. You've just dismissed them out of hand. You're not a critical thinker.
You've swallowed the entire conspiracy theorist line without due consideration of a whole series of imagined anomalies that day. You've just accepted them out of hand. You're not a critical thinker.
 

TCassidy

Late-Administator Emeritus
Administrator
Your position is to believe the wildly preposterous government fairy tale. Your far-fetched theory doesn't stand up to the facts that are all too obvious.
Your position is to believe the wildly preposterous conspiratorial fairy tale. Your far-fetched theory doesn't stand up to the facts that are all too obvious.
 

Reynolds

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Funny. I do not know if there was a conspiracy. I do not know if there was a backup shooter in place if needed. What I do know is Oswald was the only one that shot. It was a rather easy shot.
Your position is to believe the wildly preposterous government fairy tale. Your far-fetched theory doesn't stand up to the facts that are all too obvious.
 

Rippon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You've swallowed the entire conspiracy theorist line without due consideration of a whole series of imagined anomalies that day. You've just accepted them out of hand. You're not a critical thinker.
Can't think on your own. You are subject to group-think.
 

HankD

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
You've swallowed the entire governmental line without due consideration of a whole series of anomalies that day. You've just dismissed them out of hand. You're not a critical thinker.
Sorry for the malaprop and yes my wife says the same about my thinking.

HankD
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top