Intelligent rebuttal.
Look, a person can believe gay marriage is wrong, an abomination, or whatever. However, you cannot legislate your personal morality, religion, or belief onto others. As the maxim goes, my right to swing my fists ends where your nose begins.
If the Bible were the law of the land, then you'd probably be right. However, we live under a secular government, based on the Constitution of the United States. You should not mix the two.
You want intelligent conversation address post # 113 which refers to some of the issues you've raised for an argument to support your agenda to help those who promote wickedness. I don't see any value at all in chasing rabbits you can raise in a format like this while you avoid addressing reasoned arguments.
I am well aware that it is your view to put the world above God and to base your the value of your morals on that, as arre many others here. Add that to your constant avoidance by going circular by making such ignorant statements that morals should never be imposed on others and you clearly have no room to talk about "intelligent rebuttals". I gave you back exactly what you were giving with that duh.
You aren't fooling anyone (or very few) with your arguments or where you're coming any more than anyone would believe your reasoning why you like your little dancing in-your-face signature. Your reason for being here on this board and where you're coming from is clear to me.
I've asked for a logical reason for Christians not to boycott JC Penny, that is what the thread is about and I certainly don't expect that answer from you.. I'm not interested in chasing your other agendas under this format.
Last edited by a moderator: