• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Jehovah's Witnesses were going door to door...

preacher4truth

Active Member
Wow, he blasts Matthew Henry while following the nut job heretical false prophetess Ellen G. White. I am not in the least surprised. :type:
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
I listed MH's points. Why keep doing that: you meaning keep posting his quotes? Because you don't respond to them.

Endless ranting about prior ranting proves nothing.

You have not shown one statement of mine to be incorrect.

If you would like to do it - have a shot. Repeatedly making false claims is not the way to "present details".

I think "almost" everyone can understand this basic idea - certainly you do understand it - or you would not be avoiding the details in post after post - while I "post exact quotes" in post after post.


MH is not schizophrenic as you have set him up to be.
You use the word schizophrenic - not me.

I simply admit that he believed in OSAS (which even you cannot deny) and then I quote his exact wording for Matt 18 (which again - you cannot deny) - so you resort to "making stuff up" and accusations with "no detail" to support them. How sad.

Hard to get around that one.

Apparenly Preacher4Truth approves of your methods and I have to believe that one or two others might also fall into that category.

in Christ,

Bob
 
Last edited by a moderator:

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Endless ranting about prior ranting proves nothing.

You have not shown one statement of mine to be incorrect.
You still have not answered one of my statements (quotes of MH). Why is that?
If you would like to do it - have a shot. Repeatedly making false claims is not the way to "present details".
I have given you at length details of the parable and the prayer. Why do you want to hear it over and over again it you are not going to accept it. You are not teachable.
I think "almost" everyone can understand this basic idea - certainly you do understand it - or you would not be avoiding the details in post after post - while I "post exact quotes" in post after post.
I have done the same thing. You won't answer the post. Why?
You use the word schizophrenic - not me.
Yes I do. That is what you make MH out to be by your misrepresentation of him.
I simply admit that he believed in OSAS (which even you cannot deny) and then I quote his exact wording for Matt 18 (which again - you cannot deny) - so you resort to "making stuff up" and accusations with "no detail" to support them. How sad.
Obviously if he believes in OSAS he cannot believe what you try to make him say by your quote. He is not a schizophrenic. Answer the posts of his that I previously posted for you. What does he mean in those quotes?
Apparenly Preacher4Truth approves of your methods and I have to believe that one or two others might also fall into that category.
He sees through your hypocrisy and dissimulation.
 

BobRyan

Well-Known Member
You still have not answered one of my statements (quotes of MH). Why is that?

Because I addressed his Matt 18 comments here - in response to your first objection.

And have posted it almost half-dozen times waiting for you to come up with a response.

i

As I noted in the quote from me above - MH believes in OSAS and STILL uses the phrase you complain about.

How sad for your "gaming" argument.

Obviously MH would want to spin the parable and find a way for OSAS to survive it. My point was simply that he did acknowledge that phrase as valid.

Quote:
[FONT=&quot]Matthew Henry[/FONT]

[FONT=&quot]Matt 18[/FONT]
(2.) How he revoked his pardon and cancelled the acquittance, so that the judgment against him revived He delivered him to the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due unto him. Though the wickedness was very great, his lord laid upon him no other punishment than the payment of his own debt. Note, Those that will not come up to the terms of the gospel need be no more miserable than to be left open to the law, and to let that have its course against them. See how the punishment answers the sin he that would not forgive shall not be forgiven He delivered him to the tormentors the utmost he could do to his fellow servant was but to cast him into prison, but he was himself delivered to the tormentors. Note, The power of God's wrath to ruin us, goes far beyond the utmost extent of any creature's strength and wrath. The reproaches and terrors of his own conscience would be his tormentors, for that is a worm that dies not devils, the executioners of God's wrath, that are sinners' tempters now, will be their tormentors for ever. He was sent to Bridewell till he should pay all. Note, Our debts to God are never compounded either all is forgiven or all is exacted glorified saints in heaven are pardoned all, through Christ's complete satisfaction damned sinners in hell are paying all, that is, are punished for all. The offence done to God by sin is in point of honour, which cannot be compounded for without such a diminution as the case will by no means admit, and therefore, some way or other, by the sinner or by his surety, it must be satisfied.


i

As I noted in the quote from me above - MH believes in OSAS and STILL uses the phrase you complain about.

How sad for your "gaming" argument.

Obviously MH would want to spin the parable and find a way for OSAS to survive it. My point was simply that he did acknowledge that phrase as valid.

...
I simply admit that he believed in OSAS (which even you cannot deny) and then I quote his exact wording for Matt 18 (which again - you cannot deny) - so you resort to "making stuff up" and accusations with "no detail" to support them. How sad.

DHK said:
Obviously if he believes in OSAS he cannot believe what you try to make him say by your quote.

hint: My quote above says that MH believes in OSAS.

You need to come up with an actual response to the point.

in Christ,

Bob
 

DHK

<b>Moderator</b>
Because I addressed his Matt 18 comments here - in response to your first objection.

And have posted it almost half-dozen times waiting for you to come up with a response.
This is just an outright lie.
You have not addressed the quotes I have provided for you once; not once.
You must keep posting one quote over and over and over again, just as you have provided again. Address the quotes that I have provided for you.
What are you ashamed of?
 

prophet

Active Member
Site Supporter
This is just an outright lie.
You have not addressed the quotes I have provided for you once; not once.
You must keep posting one quote over and over and over again, just as you have provided again. Address the quotes that I have provided for you.
What are you ashamed of?

Bob's versión of addressing points that other's make, often consists of Bob doing the one thing that Bob hates most in others...Bob quoting Bob.
 
Top