Zenas said:
Linda64 said: Not so! Although regarding Mary as the new Eve is a well established Catholic belief, it is not a uniquely Catholic belief. It is highly inferable from the Bible, just as the doctrine of the Trinity is inferable from the Bible. Neither is expressly stated.
This is the lamest argument that is so often repeated it becomes ad nauseum. OK Zenas: theology, Christology, Bibliology, theophany, soteriology, rapture, and hundreds of other theological terms are not found in the Bible. Do you believe in the study of God and His Word: Yes or No? If Yes, then you believe in theology--the study of God--but your reaosning tells me you don't because "theology isn't found in the Bible

This is the most inane reasoning I have come across.
The trinity is clearly taught in the Bible:
There is only one God: Isaiah 43:10 and all throughout ch.44.
Christ is God: John 1:1, 14; 10:27-30; 1John 5:7
The Holy Spirit is God Acts 5:1-4
The Baptism of Jesus in Mat.3 shows the trinity.
All throughout the Bible there are various places that demonstrate the trinity--three persons and yet one God. The name of the theological concept being taught (trinity) is of no consequence at all.
But the concept or teaching that Mary is the new Eve is heresy and contradicts all Biblical teaching. There is not an ounce of Scriptural evidence for this heretical teaching whatsoever. If there were someone would produce it.
Linda64 also said:
"Because he got invited, something that will never happen to you or me. You seem to think it is a sin to appear on a worldly TV show."
Yet we are told to be in the world but not of it. I thank God that we have Christians in this country with enough credibility to get invited to go on Larry King. If I recall correctly, he was on a panel with the president of a Catholic university and a jewish scholar. I don't recall the topic, but the three guests got along famously. Near the end of the program, Larry King said something to Mohler about Baptists and Catholics getting closer, or words to that effect. Mohler bristled and made his "pope teaches a false gospel" statement.
Then why would Mohler be speaking out of both sides of his mouth. Why would he espouse Catholic theology on one hand (belief that Mary is the new Eve), and claim, on the other hand, that the Pope teaches a false gospel. Something doesn't sit right.