Paul,
It is not like we hate Liberty, either. I think most of the alumni I have spoken to about this situation are cautiously optimistic that Liberty will do the right thing. We are not trying to "get Liberty" or "attack Liberty." Most of us love our school. We, though, want to be put forth a school of integrity who sends out students who are "Champions for Christ" and see this situation as an attack on the school's integrity.
Yet, these statements by Geisler and Ankerberg do concern me. Now, if at the end of this Liberty does take steps to deal with the situation and Geisler and Ankerberg acted completely independent from Liberty, I will view my current hesitation as a momentary lapse of judgment. If, on the other hand, these men spoke after talking to Liberty and this is a foreshadow of their decision, I will be highly disappointed in Liberty.
Thank you Ruiz.
I love LU and I am praying that God will be glorified through all of this.
I am disappointed in the responses of my dear brothers in Christ who think that public statements by leaders should be given a pass. Apparently Ankerberg can speak out, but we little foot soldiers must shut our mouths.
Ok, guys, you have won me over. I agree with John Ankerberg. Caner's testimony is completely true and anyone who says otherwise is unchristian and unbiblical.