• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

John McCain's Worst Nightmare Will Officially Announce on Monday

LadyEagle

<b>Moderator</b> <img src =/israel.gif>
People like me who aren't thrilled with McCain and won't vote for him will go to the polls and vote for Bob Barr. Or Alan Keyes. Or Huckabee.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
I'm not thrilled with McCain either, but a vote for any one of them is a vote for whoever wins in November, be it McCain, Obama or Clinton.

McCain has already stated his supreme court appointees would be along the lines of Bush's. That means something to me, as that would go a long way in reversing Roe v. Wade.
 

KenH

Well-Known Member
webdog said:
a vote for any one of them is a vote for whoever wins in November, be it McCain, Obama or Clinton.

That is such a load of nonsense. A vote is a vote for the person for whom the vote is cast. It is ridiculous to claim that to vote for one person means that he/she is voting for someone whom he/she does not support.
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
KenH said:
That is such a load of nonsense. A vote is a vote for the person for whom the vote is cast. It is ridiculous to claim that to vote for one person means that he/she is voting for someone whom he/she does not support.
If the person you are voting for has no chance of winning, you are basically giving your vote to whoever. That is truth. If you don't think so, why are you not voting for Ron Paul? I recall you saying it's because you want to MAKE A DIFFERENCE in this election.
 

KenH

Well-Known Member
Ron Paul is not on the ballot.

So if it is apparent by November 4 that Senator McCain won't win Ohio will you not vote for him because he cannot win your electoral votes?
 

webdog

Active Member
Site Supporter
KenH said:
Ron Paul is not on the ballot.

So if it is apparent by November 4 that Senator McCain won't win Ohio will you not vote for him because he cannot win your electoral votes?
You can't write him in? What a lame cop-out :rolleyes:

McCain will win Ohio. If Obama is the democratic nominee, it's a given.
 

KenH

Well-Known Member
Avoiding the question, I see, but that's par for the course. :rolleyes:

I did that in November 1988 for Jack Kemp and I never saw my vote in any totals that were announced.
 
Last edited:

poncho

Well-Known Member
We don't know who our votes are going to anyway with easily manipulated electronic voting.
 

hillclimber1

Active Member
Site Supporter
poncho said:
We don't know who our votes are going to anyway with easily manipulated electronic voting.

Then get a few million dollars together and hit up some Diebold employees, and get your man elected.....:laugh: Avoid all the political posturing. Your man wouldn't have to pretend to be someone he's not, nor promise all the social programs, or promise abortion on demand till age 1. :thumbs: I mean no offense Poncho, just struck me funny....
 

LeBuick

New Member
webdog said:
You can't write him in? What a lame cop-out :rolleyes:

McCain will win Ohio. If Obama is the democratic nominee, it's a given.

I saw this coming and still busted out laughing.

First year being married my wife told me she wrote in Mickey Mouse. I asked Why? Why not just leave it blank. You think anybody really reads those write-in's? If you didn't want your vote then vote for who I tell ya. Now she never tells me who she votes for and she picks up her book when I discuss politics.
 

EdSutton

New Member
KenH said:
Avoiding the question, I see, but that's par for the course. :rolleyes:

I did that in November 1988 for Jack Kemp and I never saw my vote in any totals that were announced.
In several states by laws that have been fairly recently enacted, such as KY for these last several years, a 'write-in' is only counted if the person (or their agent) has registered them to receive 'write-in' votes. I can 'write-in' anyone in a 'general election' (but not a primary, as that is a 'closed' event), but that "write-in vote" will only be recorded to one registered to receive such votes.

I understand, incidentally, that this practice has cost Mickey Mouse (who, somehow, seems to be an appropriate choice, in many instances) several thousand votes, each of the last several general Presidential election cycles.

Ed
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
"John McCain's Worst Nightmare Will Officially Announce on Monday"

Dream on.

McCain's worst nightmare announced long ago.

John McCain.
 

hillclimber1

Active Member
Site Supporter
KenH said:
That is such a load of nonsense. A vote is a vote for the person for whom the vote is cast. It is ridiculous to claim that to vote for one person means that he/she is voting for someone whom he/she does not support.

Well at least you are consistent in this error.
 

Magnetic Poles

New Member
EdSutton said:
I understand, incidentally, that this practice has cost Mickey Mouse (who, somehow, seems to be an appropriate choice, in many instances) several thousand votes, each of the last several general Presidential election cycles.

Ed
Give Mickey the recount he deserves! Mouse '08!
 

LeBuick

New Member
EdSutton said:
In several states by laws that have been fairly recently enacted, such as KY for these last several years, a 'write-in' is only counted if the person (or their agent) has registered them to receive 'write-in' votes. I can 'write-in' anyone in a 'general election' (but not a primary, as that is a 'closed' event), but that "write-in vote" will only be recorded to one registered to receive such votes.

I understand, incidentally, that this practice has cost Mickey Mouse (who, somehow, seems to be an appropriate choice, in many instances) several thousand votes, each of the last several general Presidential election cycles.

Ed

I told this to the wife... Should have seen the looks I got... Looks like the couch or me.. :BangHead:
 

JustChristian

New Member
KenH said:
That is such a load of nonsense. A vote is a vote for the person for whom the vote is cast. It is ridiculous to claim that to vote for one person means that he/she is voting for someone whom he/she does not support.

I don't think there's any question that Ralph Nader cost the Democrats the 2000 and 2004 elections.
 

just-want-peace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
billwald said:
Mrs Clinton has it wired. If 'Bama gets nominated there will be a tragic accident . . . .
And one thing fer sure (if he's got any smarts at all) is that he won't pick her for veep if he does get the D nomination!

(Same line of thinking!!:laugh:)
 
Top