If an individual is pro:
1.Cutting food stamps to the poor
2.Cutting funds to Meals on Wheels
3.Not providing healthcare to the poor
4.Not being in favor of paying a livable wage
5.Do not believe the poor should have affordable housing
Then what conclusion should a person draw? I am not sure where you stand on these issues.
How are the sheep and goats judged in the final judgement in Matthew?
All these things you listed are not a display of Christian charity. It is not the mission of the Church to meet the physical needs of every poor person. The
primary purpose of the Church is to proclaim the gospel of the kingdom with the aim of creating disciples (Matthew 28:19-20).
As far as acts of charity, while the Church is do good to all men it is to
start first with its own:
Galatians 6:10 So then, while we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, and especially to those who are of the household of the faith.
When the Church first loves its own (because Christ commanded it) it creates a powerful testimony in the world.
Matthew 5:16 "Let your light shine before men in such a way that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father who is in heaven."
While meeting the needs of the saints the Church should also be engaged in the community to meet needs to the degree possible. The purpose behind meeting these needs is to display the love of Christ through the Gospel.
The five things you listed are not God-given rights. The Bible does not mandate health insurance, food stamps, affordable housing, a fictitious living wage, or meals on wheels. Governments create those programs without any deference to the kingdom of God. If the government taxes us we have an obligation to pay our taxes according to the Bible. But greater than social welfare is the message of forgiveness of sins through repentance from sin and faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. That is the greatest social work the Church can do - to be the herald of that message.