Claudia says:
I view that as an all round general statement... not literally that they cannot sin. Because we already know that the Bible says if we say we have no sin then we are a liar.
and
BUT I dont think anyone who is still in rebellion against God will be allowed in Heaven.
Claudia in your first statement above you say we can't take this passage (where it says the believer can't sin) literally. You say it doesn't really mean what it says. In a later post you discuss where Jesus talks about eating his flesh and drinking His blood. There you say that we need to take the passages literally. So, where it fits your theology the Bible is literal, where it doesn't, it is not literal. I only point that out because those from the RCC say I do that when I say that Jesus did not mean we should eat his flesh literally. I can make a much better argument for the Can't and doesn't in first John being literal then you could make for the literal eating of Jesus' flesh. The only point I want you to see is that you need to really think this through and not just pass scriptures you don't understand, off as not being not literal. That said, the second statement you make above is interesting. You are right, the person who is still in rebellion against God when he dies will not be in Heaven. Where we part is that you see Rebellion as our day to day actions. If they are good we are not rebelling and if they are bad we are rebelling. That would mean that ones eternal status could change day to day. One day saved the next day not saved. How strange for those rejoicing in Heaven, over the saving of the lost, to be rejoicing one moment and then not rejoicing over the same person the next moment -- or --
Does it just make more sense that the Blood of Jesus wipes out the rebellion of a person the moment thet trust Christ to forgive them and that this cleansing lasts forever which really gives those rejoicing in Heaven something to rejoice over. What Grace that is; forever wiping clean the slate of sin. In fact, the slate is so clean that no sinful act can ever stick to it again, I mean, it is like the believer DOESN'T sin anymore, one could even declare that the believer CAN'T SIN.
What a powerful cleaner the Blood of Christ is. Besides cleaning the obvious stains it even cleans the stains that aren't even there yet.
Claudia, you believe that the Blood of Jesus is a temporary cleaner. I believe it is a permanent cleaner. If actions play a role in salvation then you also believe that you do the scrubbing while jesus provides the Blood. I believe Jesus does both the scrubing and the providing.
I have more but will let you respond before this gets to long winded.
In Christ,
Brian
I view that as an all round general statement... not literally that they cannot sin. Because we already know that the Bible says if we say we have no sin then we are a liar.
and
BUT I dont think anyone who is still in rebellion against God will be allowed in Heaven.
Claudia in your first statement above you say we can't take this passage (where it says the believer can't sin) literally. You say it doesn't really mean what it says. In a later post you discuss where Jesus talks about eating his flesh and drinking His blood. There you say that we need to take the passages literally. So, where it fits your theology the Bible is literal, where it doesn't, it is not literal. I only point that out because those from the RCC say I do that when I say that Jesus did not mean we should eat his flesh literally. I can make a much better argument for the Can't and doesn't in first John being literal then you could make for the literal eating of Jesus' flesh. The only point I want you to see is that you need to really think this through and not just pass scriptures you don't understand, off as not being not literal. That said, the second statement you make above is interesting. You are right, the person who is still in rebellion against God when he dies will not be in Heaven. Where we part is that you see Rebellion as our day to day actions. If they are good we are not rebelling and if they are bad we are rebelling. That would mean that ones eternal status could change day to day. One day saved the next day not saved. How strange for those rejoicing in Heaven, over the saving of the lost, to be rejoicing one moment and then not rejoicing over the same person the next moment -- or --
Does it just make more sense that the Blood of Jesus wipes out the rebellion of a person the moment thet trust Christ to forgive them and that this cleansing lasts forever which really gives those rejoicing in Heaven something to rejoice over. What Grace that is; forever wiping clean the slate of sin. In fact, the slate is so clean that no sinful act can ever stick to it again, I mean, it is like the believer DOESN'T sin anymore, one could even declare that the believer CAN'T SIN.
Claudia, you believe that the Blood of Jesus is a temporary cleaner. I believe it is a permanent cleaner. If actions play a role in salvation then you also believe that you do the scrubbing while jesus provides the Blood. I believe Jesus does both the scrubing and the providing.
I have more but will let you respond before this gets to long winded.
In Christ,
Brian