Saved-By-Grace
Well-Known Member
No sir you responded to my question, you have not answered it.
can you please give me it again?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
No sir you responded to my question, you have not answered it.
what does justification mean to you from the Bible?
The Scriptures state, "No one" (that excludes all people ever born) "can come to me unless the Father draws them." John 6:44.
It is repeated for emphasis in John 6:65, "For this reason I have said to you, that no one can come to Me unless it has been granted him from the Father."
There is also that most direct statement from John 14:6, "Jesus said to him, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through Me."
THE FIRST "must do" is that the Father draw that person through Christ unto Himself.
Part of that package of course is repentance, but it is not the "first to do" for then the salvation would rest upon some level of activity commensurate with the level of devotion, emotion, action, dedication, or some manner of self offering of penance.
Rather the very Acts 2 passage offered as a proof text in the OP gives the correct presentation.
"And the Lord was adding to their number day by day those who were being saved."
This is not some Calvinist or Arminian view, it is that view held by the Scriptures, in which BOTH sides agree.
Without the direct and purposeful work of the Holy Spirit using the Scriptures, there is NO salvation offered, and no desire even for repentance other than that which is referred to as earthly and of the world meaningless, "Sorry. My bad." which is of no value to grace or faith.
can you please give me it again?
I just gave you a post describing the difference between Abraham being justified on a temporal basis as opposed to Abraham being justified through the Redemption which is in Christ Jesus.
If you would calm down a little, set your anger against Calvinism aside, perhaps you might be able to have a discussion with the people here. And just to clarify...I am not a Calvinist.
Your anger blinds you.
Read the post again. We can go from there.
God bless.
There repentance does not justify them. Only faith does per scripture (Romans 3:24;5:1). Romans 6:23 says salvation is a gift. If you are given a gift and someone hands that gift to you, you then reach out and take that gift, do we then say you also took part in giving yourself that gift because you reached out and took possession of it?
I am not a blinded Calvinist or Reformed.
You have ignored the very first thing that the Lord Jesus says in Mark's Gospel, which is REPENT and BELIEVE, (1:15)
BOTH that the sinner must DO.
Until you can see and understand this, your reasoning is faulty!
further, if you want to be arrogant and condescending in your responses directed at me, I will ignore what you say. Act like a Christian if you are one!
Yes. You reached out for it. Had you not reached out for it you would have done no work. God gifts us with His amazing Grace quite apart from the works of the flesh. God's Grace comes upon us apart from any works or merit on our part.do we then say you also took part in giving yourself that gift because you reached out and took possession of it?
I am not a blinded Calvinist or Reformed. You have ignored the very first thing that the Lord Jesus says in Mark's Gospel, which is REPENT and BELIEVE, (1:15) BOTH that the sinner must DO. Until you can see and understand this, your reasoning is faulty!
Mark writes in a linear fashion. That is he lays out the story he desired to present as moving from point "A" to "B" excluding any writing technique other then a single thread. He never flashed back or flashed forward, but presents a concise time line oriented narrative of statements of facts.
However, Mark was also not present at the events, but relies upon others recollections in which he records. Therefore, although he is accurate, it is also important to not rely upon his account exclusively. Only Matthew and John have that exalted standing of having been with the Lord from the baptism.
So, when you reach into the Scriptures to attempt to bolster some claim, it must always be balanced and in your presentation of "must first" it has certainly not only become unbalanced, but fallen off.
What does the balance of Scriptures teach must come first as it pertains to salvation?
1) it is a gift of God
2) it is not attained by some to do list.
3) it involves the direct and purposed action of the Father.
4) it involves the direct and purposed action of the Holy Spirit.
5) it involves the direct and purposed use of the Scriptures (the Word, the Logos, the Lord Jesus).
As a result (not as the catalyst but the reaction to the first work of God) is that expression recorded in Romans 10.
8In fact, it says,
“The message is very close at hand;And that message is the very message about faith that we preach: 9If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.
it is on your lips and in your heart.”
Therefore, young man, it is salvation has ALREADY taken place (as Romans 10 shows) for the message is "on your lips" and already "In your heart" RESULTING in confession (repentance included) that Jesus is Lord.
Please, young man, do not miss this. Not a single person will confess without the message of salvation already implanted in the heart and on their lips.
In other words, that person has already been drawn to the Father, has already been redeemed, has already been adopted, and the results are confession that Jesus is Lord.
Do not demand from the Scriptures more. For such as you are presenting is not supportable unless you take that which is given as proof texting.
Proof texting is never good in attempting to formulate nor support a view.
you make me laugh!
and how do you conclude that I am angry?
You refer to Abraham, so does James in his Epistle, where he speaks of "faith without works being dead"
No I don't, be honest with yourself.
That is pretty apparent.
Like I said, read the previous post about justification.
Paul and James are not at odds because both are not speaking of Eternal Redemption.
The Old Testament Saint was Justified but was still in need of being freely (which means they did nothing) justified through the Redemption which is in Christ Jesus.
We don't interpret Romans 3 with Romans 4, but we interpret Romans 4 based on the truths of Romans 3:
Romans 3:20-26
King James Version (KJV)
20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.
21 But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets;
22 Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference:
23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
24 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:
25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;
26 To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.
Who's righteousness is seen in Chapter 4? Abraham's. Who's works are seen in James 2? Abraham's.
Now, Who's Righteousness is seen in Romans 3?
What are men justified through now? God's grace freely given, not earned. Through the Redemption which is in Christ Jesus.
Not because a man sets his will to repent as the disciples of John the Baptist did.
Calm down, my friend, and listen to the Word of Life. He will save you. You cannot do this.
God bless.
"In other words, that person has already been drawn to the Father, has already been redeemed, has already been adopted, and the results are confession that Jesus is Lord."
You are attempting to present such as Mark does, in a linear fashion."In other words, that person has already been drawn to the Father, has already been redeemed, has already been adopted, and the results are confession that Jesus is Lord."
so, all of this happens without the sinner repenting and believing? You simply cannot make light of what Mark writes, as he too is fully Inspired by the same Holy Spirit! What of Luke 24:47; Acts 2:38?
what of Jonah 3:7-10, especially verse 10?
You are attempting to present such as Mark does, in a linear fashion.
That is not the presentation of The Scriptures.
There is not a this, followed by this, followed by this, followed by ....
Salvation is not presented in a linear fashion, but you taking from Mark are attempting to make it conform to such a fashion.
Salvation is presented as a reaction to a catalyst.
One is dead, something took place (catalyst), resulting in that person is alive.
One is ungodly, something took place (catalyst), resulting in that person is righteous (justified, saved from wrath).
What is the catalyst?
The very work of God, not of human.
Prior to Peter confessing, it had to be revealed to Him by the Father. Is that not the clear statement of the Lord in Matthew 16 concerning a cause? Yet, was Peter actually saved at the time?
What about it?
Jonah 3:7-10
King James Version (KJV)
7 And he caused it to be proclaimed and published through Nineveh by the decree of the king and his nobles, saying, Let neither man nor beast, herd nor flock, taste any thing: let them not feed, nor drink water:
8 But let man and beast be covered with sackcloth, and cry mightily unto God: yea, let them turn every one from his evil way, and from the violence that is in their hands.
9 Who can tell if God will turn and repent, and turn away from his fierce anger, that we perish not?
10 And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God repented of the evil, that he had said that he would do unto them; and he did it not.
As I have tried to show you numerous times...we don't equate conditions in the Old Testament with New Covenant conditions, elements, and provision.
In the Old Testament, for example, the Children of Israel were given manna. Christ compares this with His flesh which He will give for the life of the world. Manna did not keep men from dying, His flesh (Sacrifice) will.
Abraham was not eternally redeemed because he believed God would make of him a great nation, or that many nation would proceed from him, or...that he would give him a son.
He was justified in the same temporal manner that men received atonement for sins through vicarious animal death.
Above we have in view...physical destruction. Most of the Old Testament is presented in type, figure, shadow, parable, etc. The reality of Salvation in Christ did not begin until Christ established the New Covenant through His Blood, His Death, His Sacrifice.
Abraham was "made perfect" in regards to remission of sins when Christ died on the Cross. So we don't take his faith and works by which he was justified and equate that with being eternally redeemed through faith in Christ.
God bless.
so, has God changed His mind on the requirements that He demanded in the Old Testament, in the New?