Featured King James vs the original Greek

Yes, the person using Nas/Esv/Nkjv can have confidence that they have the word of the Lord to them in English!

 

Those critical texts still would be the word of the Lord to us in the original language, as would be the MT and the TR!

 

But what about the thousands of variant readings

 

None of them would change essential/major doctrines would they?

 

that is not the point. it is about reliability of the text

 

Because the member states that only those originals are inspired. Which means that view would hold to that not a single Bible is inspired that can be held in hand today. Nor can they all be inspired differing as much as they do.

 

All of the Greeks texts inmentioned would be reliable to use for study and translation purposes!

 

Greek texts that you mentioned? like what?

 

Inspiration by the Holy Spirit is ONLY the Original Autographs. NO translation, however good and faithful they might be, are "Inspired". they simply cannot be.

 

CT/MT/TR!

 

Agreed, as that was limited to those authorized b y God, His prophets and Apostles!

 

Wrong!

 

is not the word of God to us in the Koine Greek to be found in all of them?

 

Sure inspiration is still around. You don’t think “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God” only applies to nothing man has today do you?

 

Do you think Jesus lied to us when he stated ONLY was given to his Apostles, and to those under them?

 

Firstly the TR is not a critical text. The others misrepresent the quotes from the church fathers on many instances

 

The TR agrees with the CT far more then disagree though!

 

Check John 1.18 in the 3 translations and tell me which represents the Original Autographs

 

CT is not reliable

 

Jesus is both God and the Son, so what is the problem?