Yes, the person using Nas/Esv/Nkjv can have confidence that they have the word of the Lord to them in English!so which is the Word of God, and are they all equally reliable?
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Yes, the person using Nas/Esv/Nkjv can have confidence that they have the word of the Lord to them in English!so which is the Word of God, and are they all equally reliable?
Those critical texts still would be the word of the Lord to us in the original language, as would be the MT and the TR!The Hebrew MT has been corrupted in places by the Jews. What about the Greek texts of Nestle-Aland, UBS, W&H? Your argument does not hold.
Those critical texts still would be the word of the Lord to us in the original language, as would be the MT and the TR!
None of them would change essential/major doctrines would they?But what about the thousands of variant readings
None of them would change essential/major doctrines would they?
Because the member states that only those originals are inspired. Which means that view would hold to that not a single Bible is inspired that can be held in hand today. Nor can they all be inspired differing as much as they do.LOST!. Why, does this bother you, or cause you problems?
All of the Greeks texts inmentioned would be reliable to use for study and translation purposes!that is not the point. it is about reliability of the text
All of the Greeks texts inmentioned would be reliable to use for study and translation purposes!
Because the member states that only those originals are inspired. Which means that view would hold to that not a single Bible is inspired that can be held in hand today. Nor can they all be inspired differing as much as they do.
CT/MT/TR!Greek texts that you mentioned? like what?
Agreed, as that was limited to those authorized b y God, His prophets and Apostles!Inspiration by the Holy Spirit is ONLY the Original Autographs. NO translation, however good and faithful they might be, are "Inspired". they simply cannot be.
CT/MT/TR!
is not the word of God to us in the Koine Greek to be found in all of them?Wrong!
Sure inspiration is still around. You don’t think “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God” only applies to nothing man has today do you?Inspiration by the Holy Spirit is ONLY the Original Autographs. NO translation, however good and faithful they might be, are "Inspired". they simply cannot be.
Do you think Jesus lied to us when he stated ONLY was given to his Apostles, and to those under them?Sure inspiration is still around. You don’t think “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God” only applies to nothing man has today do you?
is not the word of God to us in the Koine Greek to be found in all of them?
The TR agrees with the CT far more then disagree though!Firstly the TR is not a critical text. The others misrepresent the quotes from the church fathers on many instances
Yes, the person using Nas/Esv/Nkjv can have confidence that they have the word of the Lord to them in English!
The TR agrees with the CT far more then disagree though!
Jesus is both God and the Son, so what is the problem?Check John 1.18 in the 3 translations and tell me which represents the Original Autographs