franklinmonroe
Active Member
Logos1560 said:In his 1833 revision of the KJV, Noah Webster wondered how an error remained uncorrected in the KJV for more than two centuries in Matthew 23:24 (misprint "strain at a gnat" for correct "strain out"). The Cambridge History of the Bible noted that "strain at" (Matt. 23:24) "was almost certainly a printer's error" (Vol. 3, p. 362)...
Once more, because I am curious, is there any substantive evidence behind all the citations of these men that "at" came into the text accidentally?
I intially revealed in post #9 some evidence that "at" was intentionally edited into a translator's working copy (a notation in a Bishop's Bible). Is there any to the contrary? Thanks
Last edited by a moderator: