KJVO question

[JesusFan]

KJV-only advocates put blind faith in assertions and claims that are not true, thus deceiving themselves.
They assume some of their claims through use of fallacies such as begging the question. The Scriptures warn believers about being deceived.

They still have yet to prove that the Kjv is perfect, or that the TR Greek text is!

 

[JesusFan]

Thank you for bringing your irrelevant anti-Calvinist comments to yet another thread, I can't wait to see what unrelated thread you shoe-horn them into next.

Anti calvinist and Kjvo both seem to have a fixed mind set going on!

 

[JesusFan]

I am not attacking KJV. I use it more than any other version. I believe it is as good as any version. My question is, what do the branch of KJVO that believe in inspired translation, base that belief on?

Traditions and false teachings of men

 

[alexander284]

They will misapply promises of the lord concerning the originals as being perfect and inspired and apply that to the Kjv, and will also use derived inspiration from the original languages texts

They will elevate the Kjv to just where the Muslims see the Koran, but God never stated any translation would be perfect

I like your analogy here, sir.

 

[5 point Gillinist]

I

Yet another off topic effort to belittle others by the use of fallacious argumentation. And addressing those that read between the lines to pour their presuppositions into the text is the topic of this thread.

It's mighty big of you to own up to your mistake. I'm glad that you agree with me.

 

[Van]

I
It's mighty big of you to own up to your mistake. I'm glad that you agree with me.

Yet another post addressing the poster and not the topic. KJVO folks read between the lines to find their English translation was the only one preserved by providence. Calvinists read between the lines to find numerous false doctrines.

 

[5 point Gillinist]

Yet another post addressing the poster and not the topic. KJVO folks read between the lines to find their English translation was the only one preserved by providence. Calvinists read between the lines to find numerous false doctrines.

Because the poster, you, posted something irrelevant, an Anti-Calvinism comment, to the topic which is about KJV onlyism. Not every topic needs you to dead horsewhip Calvinism. Are you understanding now?

 

[5 point Gillinist]

What do the KJVO who believe that God miraculously preserved the KJV, but no other version, base that belief on?
How did they choose the KJV as the version they choose to believe this about?

I once heard someone make the argument using Psalm 12:6, citing the part where it says "like gold refined seven times" and that because the KJV is the seventh English translation of the bible (I didn't even bother to look into that) that it is the true translation. This was one of the most absurd.

Kent Hovind (a disgraced creationist advocate) is also KJVO and said that all the non TR manuscripts were found in Egypt, and due to them being in "good" condition that meant that people didn't use them because they weren't any good. He also claimed that they were gnostic corruptions, therefore why they hadn't been used.

 

[JesusFan]

I once heard someone make the argument using Psalm 12:6, citing the part where it says "like gold refined seven times" and that because the KJV is the seventh English translation of the bible (I didn't even bother to look into that) that it is the true translation. This was one of the most absurd.

Kent Hovind (a disgraced creationist advocate) is also KJVO and said that all the non TR manuscripts were found in Egypt, and due to them being in "good" condition that meant that people didn't use them because they weren't any good. He also claimed that they were gnostic corruptions, therefore why they hadn't been used.

The word of the Lord as in the Originals were all inspired by the Holy Spirit, and were already perfect and pure, no need to refine any further!

 

[robycop3]

I once heard someone make the argument using Psalm 12:6, citing the part where it says "like gold refined seven times" and that because the KJV is the seventh English translation of the bible (I didn't even bother to look into that) that it is the true translation. This was one of the most absurd. Actually, the passage mentions silver, not gold. david was COMPARING God's words to 7-times-refined silver, the purest thing on earth he knew of

Kent Hovind (a disgraced creationist advocate) is also KJVO and said that all the non TR manuscripts were found in Egypt, and due to them being in "good" condition that meant that people didn't use them because they weren't any good. He also claimed that they were gnostic corruptions, therefore why they hadn't been used.

In his infinite wisdom, Hovind didn't bother to find out WHAT MSS the TR itself is made from. Nor does he know which of the over 30 TR revisions is "the" one.

 

[Reformed1689]

Yet another off topic effort to belittle others by the use of fallacious argumentation.

Right, because you throwing Calvinists in with KJVO was on topic....

 

[Van]

Right, because you throwing Calvinists in with KJVO was on topic....

The topic was being unteachable because of closed mindedness. KJVO and Calvinists both fit.

 

[Reformed1689]

The topic was being unteachable because of closed mindedness. KJVO and Calvinists both fit.

And you aren't?

 

[Van]

And you aren't?

Note once again the Calvinist violates the rules and addresses the poster and not the position.

And of course I am open minded, because I learn from my mistakes, and post where I admit my error.

However neither a KJVO or Calvinist posts where the KJB is in error or where Calvinism's the TULIP is in error.

 

[Reformed1689]

Note once again the Calvinist violates the rules and addresses the poster and not the position.

And of course I am open minded, because I learn from my mistakes, and post where I admit my error.

However neither a KJVO or Calvinist posts where the KJB is in error or where Calvinism's the TULIP is in error.

Van cut the junk, you call names, ignore posts, and focus on posters all the time. I asked you a question based on your post. So quit deflecting. And no, you do not learn from your mistakes and NEVER admit your error. You prove that every day on this forum.

 

[Reformed1689]

Calvinism's the TULIP is in error.

Because it's not.

 

[Van]

Van cut the junk, you call names, ignore posts, and focus on posters all the time. I asked you a question based on your post. So quit deflecting. And no, you do not learn from your mistakes and NEVER admit your error. You prove that every day on this forum.

Yet another rule violation, another personal attack post. This is how the false doctrine of Calvinism is defended.

Question, what doctrines of Calvinism are in error. I say the T, U, L, and I are in error. The P comes close enough to "once saved always saved" to be considered valid.

Question, what translation choices in the KJB are in error. I say it is full of less than the best choices from Genesis to Revelation.

 

[Van]

Because it's not.

Ever notice how the empty posters usually post taint so, but do not post what they believe is so?

 

[Reformed1689]

Ever notice how the empty posters usually post taint so, but do not post what they believe is so?

Says the king of "taint so"

 

[kyredneck]

bringing your irrelevant anti-Calvinist comments to yet another thread

I've known @Van since March 2011 and he ain't changed a lick. Calvinist hatred is a deep sickness with some of these people. Makes one wonder what has occurred in their lives to bring such hatred about.