• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

La La Land

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
Is our president in La La Land

Chuck Nash: Obama described a 'fantasy world' at WH summit
Feb. 19, 2015 -

http://video.foxnews.com/v/40689771...-a-fantasy-world-at-wh-summit/?#sp=show-clips

*****************************************************************

Obama urges social reforms to combat terror, hit for ‘double-speak’

Published February 19, 2015FoxNews.com

President Obama doubled down Thursday on his strategy for confronting terrorism, one that increasingly speaks of long-term social solutions, but that seems to go out of its way to stop short of addressing the more immediate challenge: how to stop the barbaric onslaught and spread of the Islamic State and other Islamic radical groups.

Declaring, "We are not at war with Islam," Obama capped his White House summit on "violent extremism" with a repeat of his message that the international community needs to address economic and political "grievances" that terrorists exploit.

Obama acknowledged the "unspeakable cruelty" inflicted by the Islamic State and said countries must be "unwavering" in fighting these organizations. But he underscored the importance of improving political systems, boosting economies and making impoverished and desperate communities less susceptible to terror recruiters -- echoing a comment from a State Department official this week that jobs-creation programs could be an effective counterterrorism tool.

He offered no hint, however, that the summit had produced a clear, unified and immediate global strategy to ultimately defeat the Islamic State -- instead issuing the declaration to the Islamic world that, "We are not at war with Islam."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...eforms-to-combat-terror-hit-for-double-speak/
 

777

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Obama doesn't even have a strategy to combat terrorism or to deal with Iran, other than his staff saying jihadists need a better job and to warn against backlash. He might not be "at war with Islam" but Islam is at war with everybody else.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Obama doesn't even have a strategy to combat terrorism or to deal with Iran, other than his staff saying jihadists need a better job and to warn against backlash. He might not be "at war with Islam" but Islam is at war with everybody else.

You are on top of that one....and to answer brother OR, yes he is out to lunch! :tear:
 
Last edited by a moderator:

The American Dream

Member
Site Supporter
I did not vote for Obama either time, but a few observations are in order. No one seems to admit voting for him, yet he won a substantial victory not once but twice. If you in fact did not vote for Obama, you voted for a liberal Republican in 2008 and voted for a cult member that is liberal in 2012. Obama got 36% of the vote in the state I vote in, what about yours? What did you do to effect the nomination of a conservative Republican in 2008 and 2012?

Another point, everyone of you are going to harp on Obama until the day he is out of office. He has less than two years left. You are going to harp on him so long you will do nothing to ensure a true Republican is nominated in 2016 and will wake up November 2016 one morning and wonder why another Democrat was elected. And the beat goes on. For those of you that think there is an ounce of difference between the present state of the Democrats and Republicans, get your heads out of the sand.

If you want an accurate measure, read the Constitution and compare the two parties. You will see a gap. Better yet, compare the two parties to a Holy God and you will see a very wide gap.
 

robustheologian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I'm starting to wonder if all the harping on President Obama is racially motivated. Of course we will hear excuses of that not being the case.
 

Walguy

Member
I'm starting to wonder if all the harping on President Obama is racially motivated. Of course we will hear excuses of that not being the case.
As usual, the Democrat response to conservative criticism of Obama is to call all of us racists. We harp about Obama because he is systematically destroying the country we love. Our criticism would be the same if he were white, Hispanic, or green with purple stripes. You have no answer for our arguments, so you play the race card. This is known, to be relatively polite, as intellectually vacant. Much like the President's foreign and domestic policies.
 

robustheologian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
As usual, the Democrat response to conservative criticism of Obama is to call all of us racists. We harp about Obama because he is systematically destroying the country we love. Our criticism would be the same if he were white, Hispanic, or green with purple stripes. You have no answer for our arguments, so you play the race card. This is known, to be relatively polite, as intellectually vacant. Much like the President's foreign and domestic policies.

Well this is full of a bunch of assumptions here...which doesn't surprise me. This is proving my point. You're making judgement calls without information...which is intellectually vacant.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
As usual, the Democrat response to conservative criticism of Obama is to call all of us racists. We harp about Obama because he is systematically destroying the country we love. Our criticism would be the same if he were white, Hispanic, or green with purple stripes. You have no answer for our arguments, so you play the race card. This is known, to be relatively polite, as intellectually vacant. Much like the President's foreign and domestic policies.

Ha ha ha ha:laugh::thumbsup:
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
Hmmmm. I'm starting to wonder if we have a sock puppet.

Zaac from Atlanta, Ga disappears, along with his constant barrage of accusations of racism of the BB members.

Now another Atlanta Ga poster comes along and is here a very short time before HE calls everyone a racist.
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Hmmmm. I'm starting to wonder if we have a sock puppet.

Zaac from Atlanta, Ga disappears, along with his constant barrage of accusations of racism of the BB members.

Now another Atlanta Ga poster comes along and is here a very short time before HE calls everyone a racist.

Yea my thoughts exactly
 

Rippon

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Point is if one voted for McCain or cult member Romney they are not conservative
I don't think your idea has any merit. What were we supposed to do --vote for Obama? There wern't many options. By the way, Romney was and is, a much better candidate than McCain.

I bet the great majority of conservative voters voted for John and Mitt --even those associated with the Tea Party.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

The American Dream

Member
Site Supporter
I don't think your idea has any merit. What were we supposed to do --vote for Obama? There wern't many options. By the way, Romney was and is, a much beeter candidate than McCain.

I bet the great majority of conservative voters voted for John and Mitt --even those associated with the Tea Party.

So what did you do to ensure a conservative nominee those years? Answer, probably nothing but post on the internet. Mitt by the way was a terrible candidate. Look at his record while governor of MA on abortion, gay rights, gun control, and government run health care. You will see they are exactly like Obama's now. If he was that good of a candidate, he would have won, wouldn't he?
 

The American Dream

Member
Site Supporter
So TAD, did you vote in 2008 and 2012 for presidential candidates?

Well I will be glad to answer your questions, but don't know who Tad is. In 2008 I voted for Chuck Baldwin of the Constitution Party. In 2012 I was a delegate to their Presidential nominating convention and voted for Virgil Goode.
 

just-want-peace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Hank when I said harp on Obama, it was not in relation to race. It was the idea that the time harping on Obama could be better spent getting a decent candidate for 2016.

Totally agree with this thought, but don't count on the Rs fulfilling your dream.

IMHO there are a few that could fill the bill, but the closer one comes to being a "TRUE CONSERVATIVE", the more the establishment Rs are gonna ambush him. The last two POTUS elections speak to this fact.

I am almost to the point that I feel the Rs are so confident that conservatives will vote "R" that they have no incentive to offer up anybody other than a RINO. (Seems sometimes that they (Rs) want to guarantee that a D will win, based on their choice of candidate.)

Again, IMHO, to continue to vote R after we've seen their idea of a "conservative" candidate in '08 & '12 is just proving them right.
 
Top