• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Latinos Outraged By 'Anchor Baby' Term, See It As Offensive

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
I care for all children.

Phncho, why is it that so many Republicans care only about the unborn child, but care nothing about its welfare after it is born?

I answered your question. Please answer mine.

Not an honest question. He would be stupid to answer it. The only evidence you will look at to support your claim is they reject the Democrat party. You will write off any attempt to debate your points as off-topic, or irrational, when it is the question that is irrational. You simply have no evidence that people do not care.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Not an honest question. He would be stupid to answer it. The only evidence you will look at to support your claim is they reject the Democrat party. You will write off any attempt to debate your points as off-topic, or irrational, when it is the question that is irrational. You simply have no evidence that people do not care.

Ah, ok. So you reject the Democratic party. But as a good independent you support:

WIC
Food Stamps
Immunizations for children
Free school lunches for the poor
Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSFP)
The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP)
Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP)
Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program (FFVP)
Summer Food Service Program (SFSP)

Just to name a few. You do support these programs that help people in need. Right.

It is just the Democrats you reject?
 

Revmitchell

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Not an honest question. He would be stupid to answer it. The only evidence you will look at to support your claim is they reject the Democrat party. You will write off any attempt to debate your points as off-topic, or irrational, when it is the question that is irrational. You simply have no evidence that people do not care.

Very succinct and correct.
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
Ah, ok. So you reject the Democratic party. But as a good independent you support:

WIC
Food Stamps
Immunizations for children
Free school lunches for the poor
Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSFP)
The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP)
Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP)
Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program (FFVP)
Summer Food Service Program (SFSP)

Just to name a few. You do support these programs that help people in need. Right.

It is just the Democrats you reject?
I don't think you should do your charity with other people's money. These programs are run by democrats, mostly, and I don't trust them, by and large. You can find private charities that do a better job than these. As far as people in need, nobody on this board has spent more time with troubled youth than I have. Nowhere near close. It depends on what your calling is. Nobody can support every charity, but everyone should donate not only money, but their own time to making life better for people that are hurting in some way. Just because someone finds the fraud and abuse in democrat-run charities and programs for the poor, does not mean they don't care.

Do you think saying other people don't give enough, based solely on party affiliation, is a fair judgement ?
 

church mouse guy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Now, Crabtown, you know that Margaret Sanger wanted to abort any anchor fetus who was not white in the name of good eugenics and evolution.

But I do concede to you, Crabtown, that the Democrat Party desperately needs some more voters no matter how illegal such votes might be. That is why, Crabtown, it is so necessary to stop any additional Cubans from entering the USA because those refugees from Stalinist Cuba tend to vote Republican. Ay, Chihuahua.

Anchor Fetus.
 

Earth Wind and Fire

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Its actually scum bag paernts who are criminal illegial aliens who use their kids as pawns to game the system. These are the exact types you should prohibit. They are operating as criminals who will lie and cheat and continue to break any law that does not agree with their lifestyles....which are nefarious.
 

Aaron

Member
Site Supporter
Again you prove yourself a liar!

Yes. This was proven long ago, and yet you all continue to feed the troll. And the administration here, quick to expel people honest about an inconsequential point of doctrine, are indefensibly solicitous of one who in his duplicity sanctions a holocaust that makes the Nazis look like Sunday school teachers.

So, you know his posts are intentionally false. Who is the father of lies? Why engage the devil in a battle of wits? Jesus gave us the perfect response. "Get thee behind me, Satan. You don't love the things that be of God."
 

OldRegular

Well-Known Member
No, I meant exactly what I ask. Why is it that so many Republicans are so concerned about a child before he or she is born, but are not concerned in ensuring that child had health services, an education, good nutrition, etc. That is my question.

Please answer. Thanks.
The above comment is false and you know it yet you continue to lie. There is nothing worse than a person being in bondage to the government yet that is what the democrats have been doing at least since the days of Woodrow Wilson.

Actually there is something worse, the American Holocaust, the slaughter of 56 million unborn babies which the democrats spent one night at their last national convention celebrating. If you really cared about children you would quit supporting "the party of death" in this country.

Your signature indicates superbly the working of your mind: You claim new revelation from God yet close with the comments of perhaps the worlds most prominent atheist. I suppose you are trying to show that you are well read but I really believe you show the "content of your character"!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter
Yes. This was proven long ago, and yet you all continue to feed the troll. And the administration here, quick to expel people honest about an inconsequential point of doctrine, are indefensibly solicitous of one who in his duplicity sanctions a holocaust that makes the Nazis look like Sunday school teachers.

So, you know his posts are intentionally false. Who is the father of lies? Why engage the devil in a battle of wits? Jesus gave us the perfect response. "Get thee behind me, Satan. You don't love the things that be of God."

:applause::applause::thumbs:
 

Crabtownboy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
I don't think you should do your charity with other people's money.

Do you approve of your tax money going to kill people instead of helping them?

These programs are run by democrats, mostly, and I don't trust them, by and large.

Proof please.

You can find private charities that do a better job than these. As far as people in need, nobody on this board has spent more time with troubled youth than I have.

Good for you. Troubled youth need help. Do you get paid for you work with troubled youth?

Do you think saying other people don't give enough, based solely on party affiliation, is a fair judgement ?

I did not say what you implied. I ask why the Republican Party and especially the candidates seem so set against helping the poor, children and those in need but seem bound and determined to help the rich and especially the super-rich.
 

Tom Bryant

Well-Known Member
Yes. This was proven long ago, and yet you all continue to feed the troll. And the administration here, quick to expel people honest about an inconsequential point of doctrine, are indefensibly solicitous of one who in his duplicity sanctions a holocaust that makes the Nazis look like Sunday school teachers.

So, you know his posts are intentionally false. Who is the father of lies? Why engage the devil in a battle of wits? Jesus gave us the perfect response. "Get thee behind me, Satan. You don't love the things that be of God."

Thanks for reminding me of what I need to do with him.
 

Bro. Curtis

<img src =/curtis.gif>
Site Supporter


Do you approve of your tax money going to kill people instead of helping them ?



Proof please.

You can find private charities that do a better job than these. As far as people in need, nobody on this board has spent more time with troubled youth than I have.

Good for you. Troubled youth need help. Do you get paid for you work with troubled youth?



I did not say what you implied. I ask why the Republican Party and especially the candidates seem so set against helping the poor, children and those in need but seem bound and determined to help the rich and especially the super-rich.
No. This board banned Poncho yet you remain. I think I'm done wit this place.

You can write whatever you want. It's your board, now.
 

just-want-peace

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No. This board banned Poncho yet you remain. I think I'm done wit this place.

You can write whatever you want. It's your board, now.

Poncho is banned????? How did I miss that??
If Poncho merits being banned, how in the name of all that is logical, decent, and moral does this NOT extend to Crabby and Zaac as well.

I certainly did not agree with Poncho most of the time, and thought he was a little over the top conspiracy-wise, but he never slunk to the level of these other two.

If this is legit, I'm another that is through with this board - unless I see some drastic reason not publicly displayed for this action.:BangHead:
 

sag38

Active Member
Poncho is banned????? How did I miss that??
If Poncho merits being banned, how in the name of all that is logical, decent, and moral does this NOT extend to Crabby and Zaac as well.

I certainly did not agree with Poncho most of the time, and thought he was a little over the top conspiracy-wise, but he never slunk to the level of these other two.

If this is legit, I'm another that is through with this board - unless I see some drastic reason not publicly displayed for this action.:BangHead:

I agree....
 

righteousdude2

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Its actually scum bag paernts who are criminal illegial aliens who use their kids as pawns to game the system. These are the exact types you should prohibit. They are operating as criminals who will lie and cheat and continue to break any law that does not agree with their lifestyles....which are nefarious.

Don't stop with the alien parents, go to the source, Obama! Along with the DNC, they are betting their future elections and control of America on greedy illegals, using their kids to gain a foot hold in America!
 

carpro

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
No. This board banned Poncho yet you remain. I think I'm done wit this place.

You can write whatever you want. It's your board, now.

Poncho banned?

Interesting....

We disagreed daily, but I never saw him do or say anything that could get him banned. Some kind of personal vendetta taking place, maybe?

Makes me wonder about the direction of this place. A lot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top