• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Let's get this out into the sunlight...

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?p=2059473#post2059473

Why did The Biblicist get banned?

Here's his posts/threads leading up to his banning; would someone like Skandelon or DHK or Dr. Bob enlighten us as to WHY he is now banned?

http://www.baptistboard.com/search.php?searchid=2141494

Initially I thought it may have been his desire to drop the one moniker and go with the other, but after reading through his last few posts/threads I don't think that's the case.

What BB rules did he break to get him banned?
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?p=2059473#post2059473

Why did The Biblicist get banned?

Here's his posts/threads leading up to his banning; would someone like Skandelon or DHK or Dr. Bob enlighten us as to WHY he is now banned?

http://www.baptistboard.com/search.php?searchid=2141494

Initially I thought it may have been his desire to drop the one moniker and go with the other, but after reading through his last few posts/threads I don't think that's the case.

What BB rules did he break to get him banned?

Looks like censorship:thumbs: His posts were solid biblically.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

HAMel

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
He didn't follow the party line?

Hey, with some of the things I've said on here I was expecting to get banned.
 

Winman

Active Member
It may not have been something he publicly said, he may have said something in a Personal Message that got him banned.

There was something going on, because The Biblicist himself talked about being banned just before he was;

The Biblicist said:
You know, this unvariably happens when I simply spell out honestly what many repeatedly do over and over again and expose the little game they play. Instead of admitting the obvious as can be seen in just looking at their responses, it turns into another personal attack upon myself as that is the only way to escape just condemnation by attacking the one who exposes them. Ok! I am big enough to take it.

Skandelon, look at what you are doing in this post! You are playing the RJP game. You quote scripture to PIT against the scripture I quoted as though they are opposed to each other.

Let me show you how you ought to have handled it instead of playing the same silly RJP game.

We have Biblical examples with God, Jesus and Paul where there came a time and place where both are equally applicable. I applied the scripture in Psalm to the appropriate case. Jesus put up with the scribes and pharisees for a long period of time but then in Matthew 23 the time and place occurred where your scriptures simply do not apply and mine does. In this situation my scripture applies and yours do not. I asked and asked and asked people like Bob and others to simply address the OP but to no avail. It is on the record for all to see. The time came to call a spade a spade.

Now, if I get booted off this forum for expressing myself this way then so be it. I am fine with that. I have no guilty conscience - none - zilch - nada.

http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?p=2058622#post2058622

The Biblicist had a very bad habit of frequently calling people liars who did not agree with him, he often accused them of being dishonest and playing games as he is doing in this very post.

And note the last line, he seemed to know he was stepping on toes.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It may not have been something he publicly said, he may have said something in a Personal Message that got him banned.

There was something going on, because The Biblicist himself talked about being banned just before he was;



http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?p=2058622#post2058622

The Biblicist had a very bad habit of frequently calling people liars who did not agree with him, he often accused them of being dishonest and playing games as he is doing in this very post.

And note the last line, he seemed to know he was stepping on toes.

No..he was responding to rev pontificate-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revmitchell View Post
Your ops attack those who disagree with you every single time. Your ops are sly underhanded slicing comments. I simply point it out. Your type of Calvinism is a blight on other Calvinists as it is nothing but pure insults and hurling attacks. Every op you post is dripping with disdain and arrogance towards those who do not hold your view and your language does nothing more than dare people to disagree with you. You are not looking for a discussion, you are just simply wanting to be right and to destroy anyone who opposes you. That is what attack dogs do. And it is the very reason several people have left this forum recently.

When I have to put up with total incompentence as with your responses, and repeated eisgetical tactics all the time, it gets tiring.

You only enter a discussion to do the very thing you are doing here. Not to deal with the issues but to make personal attacks. Anyone with two grains of common sense can see that Bob and some others simply paste and repeat over and over the same verses no matter how many times they have been COMPETENTLY exposed as false. Anyone with two grains of common sense can see that personal insults, distraction and RPJ's are the common MO of many on this forum including yourself. You just don't like being called a spade when you are a spade. If you don't like my posts then go some place else and spout your hypocrisy.
 

preacher4truth

Active Member
He schooled another who found after he was banned that he had two monikers then that was used as the reason. We know the reason, he refuted another scripturally and was thus banned and Titus 3:10 was used on him prior. Let a reformed believer use that verse and see what happens.
 

Winman

Active Member
No..he was responding to rev pontificate-
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revmitchell View Post
Your ops attack those who disagree with you every single time. Your ops are sly underhanded slicing comments. I simply point it out. Your type of Calvinism is a blight on other Calvinists as it is nothing but pure insults and hurling attacks. Every op you post is dripping with disdain and arrogance towards those who do not hold your view and your language does nothing more than dare people to disagree with you. You are not looking for a discussion, you are just simply wanting to be right and to destroy anyone who opposes you. That is what attack dogs do. And it is the very reason several people have left this forum recently.

When I have to put up with total incompentence as with your responses, and repeated eisgetical tactics all the time, it gets tiring.

You only enter a discussion to do the very thing you are doing here. Not to deal with the issues but to make personal attacks. Anyone with two grains of common sense can see that Bob and some others simply paste and repeat over and over the same verses no matter how many times they have been COMPETENTLY exposed as false. Anyone with two grains of common sense can see that personal insults, distraction and RPJ's are the common MO of many on this forum including yourself. You just don't like being called a spade when you are a spade. If you don't like my posts then go some place else and spout your hypocrisy.

Yes, but that was a response to this insult by The Biblicist;

The Biblicist said:
It attacks YOUR KIND of response! YOUR KIND of response is incompetent and a personal attack on the writer of the OP because you do not deal with the evidence presented but make sly underhanded slicing comments and then presume to take the high road when you are really acting like a worm crawling in the very manure you are charging others.

Telling someone they are like a worm crawling in manure is going overboard.
 

quantumfaith

Active Member
http://www.baptistboard.com/showthread.php?p=2059473#post2059473

Why did The Biblicist get banned?

Here's his posts/threads leading up to his banning; would someone like Skandelon or DHK or Dr. Bob enlighten us as to WHY he is now banned?

http://www.baptistboard.com/search.php?searchid=2141494

Initially I thought it may have been his desire to drop the one moniker and go with the other, but after reading through his last few posts/threads I don't think that's the case.

What BB rules did he break to get him banned?

Did you read the posts by Skan, that he was posting under two different identities. Apparently, that is against BB rules. This was the stated reason.
 

quantumfaith

Active Member
He schooled another who found after he was banned that he had two monikers then that was used as the reason. We know the reason, he refuted another scripturally and was thus banned and Titus 3:10 was used on him prior. Let a reformed believer use that verse and see what happens.

Oh, so you can read minds and ascertain motives.? Try finding another way then describing that someone "got schooled".
 

preacher4truth

Active Member
And look we have one concerned with 'manure' who himself states we preach a false gospel and do not believe the bible yet these accusations calling salvation into question go unchecked. Let a reformed brother say this and see what happens. :thumbsup:
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Did you read the posts by Skan, that he was posting under two different identities. Apparently, that is against BB rules. This was the stated reason.

Biblicist is the one who pointed it out to skan after he was railroaded...see his last post As Dr. Walter...it was after he was banned
 

preacher4truth

Active Member
Biblicist is the one who pointed it out to skan after he was railroaded...see his last post As Dr. Walter...it was after he was banned

This wasn't the reason UNTIL it was discovered AFTER the fact. There is no way they just discovered it. They only know because Dr. Walter came out and said so THEN it was used as an excuse. :)
 
Top