Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Still get the emails from SBC church I used to attend. Today the "deacons and their wives will be distributing communion elements.".
Women distributing communion?
Never heard of this in a fundamental church.
Do you think it is proper?This may be many things but it's not Liberal.
Maybe I don't want to come a long way. That is a case of women performing duties of deacons and elders.Remember the cigarette ad, “You’ve come a long way baby!”????
Maybe I don't want to come a long way. That is a case of women performing duties of deacons and elders.
Phoebe was a deacon. There is no regulative principle to not have women serving communion.Maybe I don't want to come a long way. That is a case of women performing duties of deacons and elders.
Then you disagree with Paul's plain commandments to The Church. Neither male nor female applies to salvation alone. Context is very important.I tend to agree with what Christ Jesus in Gal 3:28 "...there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus". I think to much is made of this no women in this or that position since. That, to me, seems to be more of a tradition thing than a biblical thing.
I don't care what they call themselves.Prominent Southern Baptist church Capitol Hill Baptist in Washington D.C. has been "Always doctrinally conservative", according to its website.
From an 1894 newspaper article describing the flourishing church:
"If any of the ladies will take charge of any branch of the work the male members are willing to turn it over to them".
Then you shouldn't need help distributing to a small group.Where does Scripture say that it must be distributed by deacons.
Our church is very small and we have no deacons.
First, there is no one qualified to be a deacon
Phoebe was a low Deacon. Not an administrative Deacon.Phoebe was a deacon. There is no regulative principle to not have women serving communion.
LOL, you are making a distinction that the Bible doesn't make.Phoebe was a low Deacon. Not an administrative Deacon.
This is interesting. I never considered women serving the Supper.Still get the emails from SBC church I used to attend. Today the "deacons and their wives will be distributing communion elements.".
Women distributing communion?
Never heard of this in a fundamental church.
The Bible does indeed make the distinction.LOL, you are making a distinction that the Bible doesn't make.
Paul so trusted and loved Phoebe that he entrusted her to deliver his letter to the believers in Rome. Not to any of the men he knew...but to a trusted woman.
Low deacon rather than administrative deacon. How silly you are.
I can tell you the most obvious reason I am not comfortable with it. There are instances where communion elements are to be denied to the person living in unrepentant sin. If a woman is serving a man and she denies him the elements, she is then in a place of spiritual authority over a man.This is interesting. I never considered women serving the Supper.
My first reaction was a knee jerk reaction - "no way! That's wrong."
But upon reflection, this is not liberal or unbilical. I'd find it odd.
I would not be comfortable with a woman serving the Supper. But this may be due to tradition.
Or maybe I'm just a male chauvinist pig
My reason is the women could poison the juice and take over the church.I can tell you the most obvious reason I am not comfortable with it. There are instances where communion elements are to be denied to the person living in unrepentant sin. If a woman is serving a man and she denies him the elements, she is then in a place of authority over a man.