Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
Yes, in that those cows were not good cows. The fact that "well" good looking cows can be made to look bad and be not good cows illustrates the Hebrew word for "evil" is the meaning of harm of some good. In this case "well" favored cows can be not good, as the Hebrew word for "evil" in case is translated "ill" cows.Look at Genesis 41 where the EXACT SAME WORD was used ... were those EVIL cows?
The Hebrew word for "evil" has the meaing of what is contrary to what would be a "good," Evil is defined by the hurt of some kind of good. The point of argument here, is the "problem of evil" is really the problem of some kind of good being harmed in some way.That's the prob with relying on the KJV - it has many words that had different meanings 400 years ago from what they do now. Unless one is thoroughly familiar with Elizabethan English, one can be misled.
God is infinite good.
Lies needs truth to exist.
Evil needs good to exist.
Chaos needs order to exist.
God created finite good things.
Finite good things which are not infinite, can be hurt, was the creation of evil.
Isaiah 45:7.
Ok. You seem to be failing to understand the fundamentals in being, Truth, Good and Order. The so called problem of evil, is really a problem of finite good being harmed in some way. God is the fundamental basis of all truth, good and order.I believe your contrast should be between God and Lucifer.
I believe God is sovereign over His creation, therefore He either causes or allows whatsoever comes to pass. Using this definition, without God allowing evil, evil would not exist, thus God becomes the indirect cause of evil.The logic escapes me here.
Evil is not an offshoot or side effect of the holiness of God. It was never God's desire that evil pollute his universe nor our hearts.
Did he know evil would come to be? Yes. But God did not create it directly or indirectly.
This logic could be used to say that the inventors of the automobile created drunk drivers.
God is infinite good.
Lies needs truth to exist.
Evil needs good to exist.
Chaos needs order to exist.
God created finite good things.
Finite good things which are not infinite, can be hurt, was the creation of evil.
Isaiah 45:7.
The logic escapes me here.
Evil is not an offshoot or side effect of the holiness of God. It was never God's desire that evil pollute his universe nor our hearts.
Did he know evil would come to be? Yes. But God did not create it directly or indirectly.
This logic could be used to say that the inventors of the automobile created drunk drivers.
Here is an excerpt from a paper I wrote about the topic while in seminary.
"If God is omnibenevolent, evil cannot be within Him, nor can it be emanated or created by Him. As the supremely sovereign creator, what then is "evil"? The skeptic will argue that if God is the creator of everything in existence and all things were created through Him (Gen. 1:1; John 1:3; Col. 1:16; Rev. 4:11) and evil is something that exists, God must have created evil too. After all, it is written, “…I am the LORD, and there is no other. I form the light and create darkness, I bring prosperity and create disaster; I, the LORD, do all these things” (Isa. 45:6-7). It seems as though that scripture confirms the skeptic’s claim. Furthermore, denying either God or evil leads to dualism or pantheism.
Thomas Aquinas responds the Summa Theologica, on question XLVIII. Aquinas proposes that "evil" is not a substance but absence or corruption of substance. More specifically, Aquinas states that "evil is signified as the absence of good." It is not enough to say that evil is merely an "absence." Instead, it is a privation or absence of something that should be present. This definition by no means implies that evil does not exist, or we fall into a pantheistic conclusion. Rather, as Norman Geisler explains, "Evil is a real lack, privation, or corruption of a good thing. That is, evil does not exist in itself: evil exists only in a thing or substance – and all things God made are good" (Geisler 2011, 18). Therefore, God is the creator of everything in existence. However, since evil is not a thing but a privation of good, God did not create evil. Instead, good must exist to make evil possible.
Furthermore, by comparing evil to moth holes, Geisler concludes that nothing can be entirely evil. Moth holes can corrupt a sweater, but a wholly moth-eater garment is just a hangar in the closet (Geisler 2011, 19). Satan, who by his nature, is utterly evil in a moral sense (John 8:44) is still good in a metaphysical sense because Lucifer was an angel of God. Morally, it is possible for a mere human to be utterly depraved, yet metaphysically still be good in that they are still image bearers of God."
"All good" is not the same things as "infinite good." All good excludes evil in any way. Where as infinite good cannot be affected by evil. Infinite good cannot be caused to be evil. The fact that there is evil rules out an all good God. But does not rule out that God is infinite good and evil does exist. God is the uncaused existence, infinite and omnipresent in which anything that exists must exist "in."If God is omnibenevolent, . . .
Chaos needs order to exist.
I have no problem relying on the "KJV", as I am very familiar with Late Middle English and most of its nuances, and being "misled" is something I got over a long time ago.That's the prob with relying on the KJV - it has many words that had different meanings 400 years ago from what they do now. Unless one is thoroughly familiar with Elizabethan English, one can be misled.
We have a contest on another site where someone posts a word or phrase from the KJV and people try to guess the meaning without looking it up ... like "my reins shall rejoice" (Pro. 23:16) ... what is the meaning of "reins"?As I've said before, I understand it just fine.
But there is a learning curve to it.
I think that what it really boils down to, is that the AV has a stigma attached to it...sort of like driving an out-of-style car or wearing out-of-style clothes.
It still works, and it still does the job it was designed to do...educate the children of God about Him and His ways.
Most people frown on it, even though it's the same, reliable and trustworthy Bible that it ever was.
The only thing that changed was its audience.
what is the meaning of "reins"
We have a contest on another site where someone posts a word or phrase from the KJV and people try to guess the meaning without looking it up ... like "my reins shall rejoice" (Pro. 23:16) ... what is the meaning of "reins"?
Guess that Idiom (KJV)Can you share the other site where the KJV contest is happening?
Thanks.