Look here, STEALING SHEEP "ONLY GOOD" IF WE DO IT!

You seem to love that word bashing, to the point you have made it meaningless.

So its WRONG here ON A BAPTIST board to criticize PRONOUNCEMENTS OF THE VATICAN?

You know I would have thought a SBC pastor would have been on my side. I guess I can see why the fundie\/indpt split had to happen!

 

What I am being reported for?

Hey, was it for calling you Proto-Romanists?

I guess when I see people get on fire to DEFEND ROME, while anouncing they are Baptists at the same time it does cause some Disconcertion

I think Im figuring out why all the fundies, or very few are left on this board.

How very disappointing.

 

Ok go to my original thread here, the first post that started it all, what are you upset about?

You think Im wrong to say the Vatican is being duplicitious here?

Why is it a requirement on a Baptist board to have guarded speech about Rome?

You all would have banned Spurgeon, for writing Geese in Hoods to other Anabaptists that told the truth about Rome!

 

Because you and your pals dressed me down for Catholic "bashing" simply for disagreeing with Rome's duplicity on this issue.

Considering Spurgeon gets far more direct then I do in Geese with Hoods ANYTHING I have said in this thread, that book directly calls the Papacy antichrist and other things such as a FOX {meant in a bad way} I own a copy.

I agree with Spurgeon, so why am I called a basher here? [and supposely you advertise yourself as NOT disagreeing with Spurgeon?] That makes no sense!

 

What personal attacks?

Calling someone an Emergent? Asking someone what kind of Southern Baptist are you? {actually I had thought the SBC outside of some Warrenite churches did take a strong stand against Rome}

I asked more then once for someone to deal with the TOPIC, and they refused instead turning the thread topic to ME to play silence the messenger?

 

THANK YOU

To be honest I would rather people avoid my threads if all they are going to do is to seek to berate me for my choice of subject and cry Catholic-"basher."

Catholicism know uses the term BASHER, HATER, BIGOT just like militant homosexuals used HOMOPHOBE to silence any critics.

This is one prevailing theme I have seen as Rome marches to Revelation 17 with plenty of Protestant participants, silence ALL CRITICS, by attacking their motivations, personality, and character rather then dealing with the TOPIC at hand.

One thing I have noticed is that while the Vatican has referred to other Christians who they call "sects" as "rapacious wolves" and "dangerous" that is not exactly positive language either, why do they get a free pass with the "never cricitize Rome" contingent here?

To be honest I am deeply concerned to see how many friends of Rome, have a deeply entrenched and welcomed precense on this supposely BAPTIST board.

 

I suspect that if Spurgeon could post on this board, that his dressing down would have been worse then me. I own that book, and in that book, Spurgeon gives pro-Romanist Anglicans a far harsher critique then I even approached on this board.

I notice you seem to be attacking my personality as well, now insulting me by using Spurgeon as well. Someone else who wants to make me the subject of this thread rather then dealing with the topic at hand.

 

Please list the names I called anyone, so I will know what names to avoid calling anyone...

Is Emergent considered an insult on this board?

I am sorry you cannot figure out what issue is being discussed.

Here I will give that to you:

I am discussing the Vaticans Duplicity, say one thing in one place while saying another else where in Latin America.

Oh I thought this Spurgeon quote I posted on another thread would work here too.

"Essence of lies, and quintessence of blasphemy, as the religion of Rome IS... it nevertheless fascinates a certain order of Protestants, of whom we fear it may be truly said that 'they have received a strong delusion to believe a lie, that they may be damned.' Seeing that it is so, it becomes all who would preserve their fellow-immortals from destruction to be plain and earnest in their warnings. Not in a party-spirit, but for truth's sake, our Protestantism must protest perpetually. Dignitaries of the papal confederacy are just now very prominent in benevolent movements, and we may be sure that they have ends to serve other than those which strike the public eye. A priest lives only for his church; he may profess to have other objects, but this is a mere blind. Our ancient enemies have small belief in our common sense if they imagine that we shall ever be able to trust them, after having so often beheld the depths of Jesuitical cunning and duplicity. The sooner we let certain Archbishops and Cardinals know that we are aware of their designs, and will in nothing co-operate with them, the better for us and our country. Of course, we shall be howled at as bigots, but we can afford to smile at that cry, when it comes from the church which invented the Inquisition. 'No peace with Rome' is the motto of reason as well as of religion." [C. H. Spurgeon, January 1873]

Also as mod, can you do me a favor and ask the others to deal with the topic rather then turning ME into the subject?

That would help our discussions here. Thank you.

 

using the pronoun YOU, is considered a PERSONAL ATTACK? Since when?

I feel personally attacked as well, in that some of these posters decided to make me the SUBJECT instead of the TOPIC.

I dont even barely know the people here yet, being a newbie....my original thread was IMPERSONAL, unless I am being censored for direct criticisms of the Pope and Vatican {public figures}

What bashing is that?

I am being bashed over my choice of subject. Instead of people acting adult, and either ignoring the thread, or disagreeing, saying "Jillian, I think you are wrong the Vatican really does care about Protestants" they decide to go after me instead.

Hmm is that another way of telling me "I deserve it"?

I need to know why criticizing Catholicism and the Vatican is considered so horrible on this supposely BAPTIST board?