Look here, STEALING SHEEP "ONLY GOOD" IF WE DO IT!

[donnA]

Wow,. IMAGINE THAT, a DISCUSSION site where people with different ideas
actually come to DISCUSS them..RUN....HORRORS, HIDE...

I dont tell you what subjects to talk about so dont tell me.

It's not the discussion thats the problem, it's the multiple threads on the same topic, and most of all the attitude like your presenting here. If you want people to listen to you you have to learn to calm down and not insult people.

 

[DHK]

using the pronoun YOU, is considered a PERSONAL ATTACK? Since when?

It is a personal attack whenever you direct it at someone. For example, "You pig!" The "you" obviously is personal. It is directed to the person I am writing to. And if I am writing that to you, you no doubt would be highly offended. Using the second person singular 'you", you have offended many.

I feel personally attacked as well, in that some of these posters decided to make me the SUBJECT instead of the TOPIC.

And you wonder why?? If you attack them, they will return fire.

I dont even barely know the people here yet, being a newbie....my original thread was IMPERSONAL, unless I am being censored for direct criticisms of the Pope and Vatican {public figures}

Your original thread was impersonal, for it was a quote from another website and that is fine. But you did not discuss it in an impersonal way. You went on a rant, not only calling people of Anglican persuasion names but also other Baptists names. That won't win you any points.

What bashing is that?

Bashing is personal attacks on others which you have persisted in. Take another look at your own posts.

I am being bashed over my choice of subject. Instead of people acting adult, and either ignoring the thread, or disagreeing, saying "Jillian, I think you are wrong the Vatican really does care about Protestants" they decide to go after me instead.

First, you have started too many threads all on the same subject.
Second, if a person disagrees with you then don't make it personal. Learn to debate without putting your emotions into it. Talk about the subject matter, not the person.

I need to know why criticizing Catholicism and the Vatican is considered so horrible on this supposely BAPTIST board?

If you have the truth, and can back it up with Scripture, then fine. Read the rules again. If you can't post in grace without giving offence then don't post. If your posts are deliberately made to be offensive to others, why post them. Does that bring glory to Christ?

Acts 24:16 And herein do I exercise myself, to have always a conscience void of offence toward God, and toward men.

 

[donnA]

Jillian=

I am being bashed over my choice of subject. Instead of people acting adult, and either ignoring the thread, or disagreeing, saying "Jillian, I think you are wrong the Vatican really does care about Protestants" they decide to go after me instead

I've looked and must have missed it somewhere, but please give a link where someone said this on here.

 

[rbell]

Waves bye to Jillian...:wavey:

without an attitude change, there could be a new member of the BB banned soon...

(wonder if they need a drummer?)

 

[donnA]

Waves bye to Jillian...:wavey:

without an attitude change, there could be a new member of the BB banned soon...

(wonder if they need a drummer?)

I feel this is for certain.

 

[D28guy]

I dont seem to have any problem discerning the topic. What is difficult about it?

It could be worded...

"Why does the Catholic Church criticize other groups for sharing their convictions with Catholics in order to help them "see the light" and leave Catholicism, while the Catholic Church encourages their people to share their convictions with non-catholics in order to help them "see the light" and join Catholicism?

Or, another topic heading could be....

"How can the Catholic Church be so mind bogglingly hypocritical?"

But Jillion chose...

"Look here. "STEALING SHEEP" ONLY GOOD IF WE DO IT."

And why would it be a problem? Its not redundant. I've never seen the topic before here.

Mike

 

[DHK]

I dont seem to have any problem discerning the topic. What is difficult about it?
Mike

The choice of topic was not so offensive in and of itself. The way that it was presented and "debated" was offensive by originator of the thread.

 

[D28guy]

DHK,

I posted that post after just coming to this thread and just reading the 1st few posts.

Over the past 10 or 15 minutes I've read all 5 pages. Now I see what the problem is. :thumbs:

Mike

 

[tinytim]

A couple of us are even saved! (Me and SBC1303...OK, so maybe tinytim....oh, and SFIC...OK, and I heard a rumor that one of the mods were saved.....:thumbs: :laugh: )

MAYBE...MAYBE.... wELLL...
(Tiny goes stomping off in another room mumbling to himself like a mad man... only to turn and come back in)

MAYBE!!!!

HUmmmmphhhh!!! (stomp)

 

[rbell]

MAYBE...MAYBE.... wELLL...
(Tiny goes stomping off in another room mumbling to himself like a mad man... only to turn and come back in)

MAYBE!!!!

HUmmmmphhhh!!! (stomp)

OK, you're in. I forgot the BB by-laws...the will of God can be overturned by a 2/3 majority vote.

Wait...no, that's not it....

Oh, whatever. You tithe. You're in.





:laugh: :laugh: