Sorry, as a linguist I go with the meaning of the word as used in a particular language. Certainly Christ is King and Christ is Lord, but they are not and never will be synonyms.No you didn't; and I hope that you don't believe that yourself. Please tell me that you do not think that when the Bible speaks of Jesus as King of Kings that it could mean anything similar to a king with no power- for goodness sake, not one powerlessly held in prison. Please tell me that you believe that even when Jesus was on the cross, his Sovereign power of the universe was still in tact. Please tell me that the Kingship of Jesus Christ means more to you than the debased position you seem to enunciate here- that you know it means he is SOVEREIGN above all. You do believe that is what Jesus being KING means in the Bible don't you??
And I'm really disappointed with your phrase "debased position." Simply because I insist on what I believe to be the normal meaning of words, I have a "debased position?" Do you not believe that Christ "made himself of no reputation" and was "found in fashion as a man" and "humbled himself" until He actually died on the cross? Is that a "debased position"? And that because of that God the Father gave Him a name "above every other name?" (Phil. 2:5-11) That's what I believe about Christ, exactly what the Bible says. Christ Himself emptied Himself (the kenosis) on the cross.
Now, since you obviously believe that king and lord are synonyms and I obviously do not, and because of that you say I have a "debased position" about my precious Lord and Savior Jesus Christ simply because I won't agree with you on the matter, I will henceforth leave this subject alone (king and lord) and answer no more.
My position about my precious Lord and Savior as King and Lord is far more detailed and deep than I can describe here on a simple Internet forum, and you've not begun to understand it if you think I have a debased position.