Stop being such a weasel, innocent babies are not what we're talking about here. You have implied it is possible for one to remain sinless beyond the age of accountability.
Don't be a weasel Winman, is this not correct?
I have said that no person HAS to sin. What I mean is that I do not believe a person is irresistibly compelled by their sin nature to sin as YOU and others like DHK seem to be saying. I have lied hundreds of times in my life, but I could have told the truth each and every time if I had chosen to do so. And if you are honest you will admit the same.
But I believe every single person who matures and understands right from wrong will choose to sin for many various reasons. They don't have to, but they will choose to.
Your wife asks you if you like dinner tonight. It tastes like cardboard, but you don't want to upset her, so you lie and tell her it is delicious. People lie for all sorts of reasons, but they don't have to, you could have told her the truth.
Why can't you understand what I am saying?
A good analogy is baseball. Is it possible for a person to hit 1.000? Yes, in theory it is absolutely possible to get a hit every single time you come to the plate. But has anyone ever hit 1.000? No, unless they only batted a few times.
So, it is possible to always do right, but nobody has ever done it except for Jesus.
What I am saying is true. I am not saying people do not need Jesus, everyone who has sinned needs Jesus, and that is all men. But I do not believe it includes little babies and small children who never sinned.
Tell me a sin that a newborn baby can commit.