"It is very difficult to dissallow MacArthur that level of freedom given the "fly without wings" affirmation from the Catholic church on that very point."
Oh, and this is doctrine, right? Sounds poetic to me. Even if it were a bit 'over the top' is it possible for a pope to be mistaken?
Let us say for a moment that the Pope was in error in making that affirmation. Was he also in error in attributing to Mary the salvation of the church in various times of crisis?
Let us say for the sake of argument that - again this Pope was in error.
Now we have MacArthur coming along and reading that never-denounced published statement from the Pope and many others like it - and then MacArthur makes a comment about praying to Mary and how Mary is viewed as compared to God - that is in harmony with those Papal statements (that you say are in error) but not with other statements from the Catholic church that you say are not in error.
does the fact that Macarthur is not reading your "filtered list" result in his making statements that agree with Papal published letters to the flock - that you say are in error?
Possibly so. But in your choosing to go after such a grey area - you leave the clear "that is clearly wrong" arena that you had when dealing with the virgin birth of Mary or the idea that Purgatory is another opportunity to choose heaven, or the idea that the RCC claims that no pope ever made a mistake on anything etc.
How about Blessed John MacArthur?
I have admitted to several areas where you brought up points about MacArthur's comments and I agreed that I thought you had a case.
I guess anything he says about Catholicism is OK then
How is it - that when I agree with you that MacArthur has made mistakes - you say "I guess anything he says about Catholicism is OK"??
how do we get to that point?
What have I said that leads you to that conclusion?
in Christ,
Bob