another generation
the one which began in 1947 methinks.
Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!
another generation
Except...IT DIDN'T HAPPEN THEN. So, evidently, "this generation" is another generation.
You can jump in anytime as your posts are solid.@Iconoclast, I hope you don't mind if I jump in on this. As we know, beginning with verse 4, Jesus speaks of tribulation. In verse 15, He points back to Daniel's prophecy about the abomination of desolation. The AOD was when the Roman Army desecrated the Temple. In His warning, Jesus tells His 1st Century audience that they would see this, which they did. He warned them to flee to the mountains, which they did. Hope that helped.
it happened then just as Jesus said.Except...IT DIDN'T HAPPEN THEN. So, evidently, "this generation" is another generation.
Christians have been saying "we see prophecy unfolding before our eyes" ever since Israel became a nation again in 1948. This is simply not true, as the Olivet Discourse prophecies are long since fulfilled. Jesus wasn't talking about the READER of the Olivet Discourse narrative, but the READER of Daniel's prophecy. Daniel's prophecies were fulfilled with the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70.Most of the symbolisms are pret inventions. We see the LITERAL fulfillments of prophecy right under our noses.
Remember, Jesus is to return IN LIKE MANNER(not "exact") as He left. Obviously, that hasn't yet happened.
I pointed out several events in the Olivet Discourse that were fulfilled literally, and you're just guessing that the yet-unfulfilled portions are symbolic. Again, Jesus didn't switch horses in the middle of the stream, going from literal to symbolic. Remember, He began by prophesying the destruction of the temple, which was, of course, literal, & then His disciples asked Him when those thinga would be, & what else was gonna hallen, so He answered them JUST-AS-LITERALLY. No getting by that big ole bear of a FACT that those events haven't happened yet. Jesus even said, "Let the READER understand" even before His words were written down!
Yes, preterism is false eschatology. I PRAY the HOLY SPIRIT will teach you what's literal & what's symbolic. Right now, you're depending upon MEN to tell you.
Don't think too much of me ... I fail to crucify the flesh all too often ... but thank you, it's Gal 2:20, I promise.
Interesting thought, and I did not know that information regarding Lapid. I believe the "desire of women" was the Messiah, whom every Jewish woman wished to give birth to. Daniel 11:36-45 possibly points to Herod the Great, who tried to have the infant Jesus killed.I forgot to note Daniel also describes his character in chapter 11:37 ... disregards religion of his fathers, and apparently is a homosexual? (no regard for the desire of women) ... or is a "ladies man" (object of women's desire?) I tend to favor the former as the forsaking ... and given what's transpired in the last 40 years with a return to the open perversions of the "Roman Orgys" and worse ... further perverting the things of God with a 6 color rainbow rather than the true 7 color rainbow. (Current Israeli foreign minister Lapid; favors a two-state solution (forsaking the promise of God/Lapid's father's Yahweh ... and is an open homosexual ... keep an eye on this dude)
Excellent point, Brother. I believe the firm covenant was fulfilled at the Last Supper, and Jesus allowed Himself to be crucified in the middle of the "week" which initiated an end of the old covenant. This didn't happen immediately, but "on the wing of abominations", when the Romans destroyed the Temple. (BTW, I've also read that Titus tried to stop this destruction, but the army wanted the gold. History sure is interesting.)how does Daniel 9:27 mean Jesus is the one who enters into a firm covenant with many when the passage clearly states in the middle of the week he stops the sacrifice when the account of Jesus' fulfilling Zech 9's entry on the donkey, etc is the first of the week and, of course, the crucifixion at the end of the week ... NOT the middle of the week? Meanwhile in a parallel account, John expounds and tells of antichrist entering the Temple, stopping the sacrifice and declaring himself to be God.
Different context. In 1 Corinthians, this passage clearly indicates all believers will be changed. However, not all believers would see the events described in the Olivet Discourse. Only those who were alive when those events came to pass saw it.Bad interpertation. It is like arguing the Aposlte Paul wrote that he would see it in 1 Corinthians 15:52, ". . . In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. . . ."
I have a whole bookshelf full of encyclopediae & other works of history that preve differently.It DID happen.
Jesus never even hinted those will be spiritual events. He was speaking of this world, the same one He & His disciples were then in. And those events have simply NOT yet occurred. Betcha can't prove otherwise! If you could, all the pther preterists would elect you King!You need to get off that. Just because it's a realm not of this world, a Spirit covenant that can't be seen with the natural eye or touched with the physical hand and you refuse to accept that doesn't mean Christ's words didn't come true. Let Christ be true and every man a liar.
**PROOF**, please???????????????????????????it happened then just as Jesus said.
That's because it's TRUE.Christians have been saying "we see prophecy unfolding before our eyes" ever since Israel became a nation again in 1948.
No, only a few of them are.This is simply not true, as the Olivet Discourse prophecies are long since fulfilled.
I believe differently, but if one understands Daniel's prophecy, one sees that the AOD he mentioned was fulfilled by Antiochus Epiphanes in the 160s BC. And Jesus was, of course, referring to a similar future event, which didn't occur in the old temple before it was destroyed, & thus is still future.Jesus wasn't talking about the READER of the Olivet Discourse narrative, but the READER of Daniel's prophecy. Daniel's prophecies were fulfilled with the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70.
I don't believe it was the HOLY SPIRIT who guided you into false beliefs. There are many spirits, & not all are good ones. it's very-obvious the beast hasn't yet come, nor has the great trib, and certainly not Jesus' physical, visible, glorious return, which will be seen by ALL. The evidence of reality is all against the pret view.Your prayer was answered long ago when the Holy Spirit revealed how to distinguish symbolic prophecy language from literal language. It's quite easy, if you get past man's interpretations and let the Spirit guide you.
Mt.26:64**PROOF**, please???????????????????????????
Jesus never even hinted those will be spiritual events.
Mt.26:64
Jesus saith unto him, thou hast said nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter you shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the Clouds Of Heaven.
to distinguish symbolic prophecy language from literal language
While you may very will be correct. The problem is there not being enough information provided.
You say "only a few", I say "all", then you say "only a few", and I say "all" ad infinitum.That's because it's TRUE.
No, only a few of them are.
I believe differently, but if one understands Daniel's prophecy, one sees that the AOD he mentioned was fulfilled by Antiochus Epiphanes in the 160s BC. And Jesus was, of course, referring to a similar future event, which didn't occur in the old temple before it was destroyed, & thus is still future.
I don't believe it was the HOLY SPIRIT who guided you into false beliefs. There are many spirits, & not all are good ones. it's very-obvious the beast hasn't yet come, nor has the great trib, and certainly not Jesus' physical, visible, glorious return, which will be seen by ALL. The evidence of reality is all against the pret view.
I suggest you pray for the REAL Holy Spirit to break your habit of reducing clearly-literal Scriptures to "figurative/symbolic" status to make them fit some preterist hooey.
Thank you, that looks like a good read. I've just added it to my Amazon Wish List. (Maybe my wife will take the hint.)
then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn
...
How does the full Perterist and the orthodox partial Perterist understand this differently?