• Welcome to Baptist Board, a friendly forum to discuss the Baptist Faith in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to all the features that our community has to offer.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

Make believe Eschatology

Status
Not open for further replies.

kyredneck

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Except...IT DIDN'T HAPPEN THEN. So, evidently, "this generation" is another generation.

It DID happen. You need to get off that. Just because it's a realm not of this world, a Spirit covenant that can't be seen with the natural eye or touched with the physical hand and you refuse to accept that doesn't mean Christ's words didn't come true. Let Christ be true and every man a liar.
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
@Iconoclast, I hope you don't mind if I jump in on this. As we know, beginning with verse 4, Jesus speaks of tribulation. In verse 15, He points back to Daniel's prophecy about the abomination of desolation. The AOD was when the Roman Army desecrated the Temple. In His warning, Jesus tells His 1st Century audience that they would see this, which they did. He warned them to flee to the mountains, which they did. Hope that helped.
You can jump in anytime as your posts are solid.
 

Lodic

Well-Known Member
Most of the symbolisms are pret inventions. We see the LITERAL fulfillments of prophecy right under our noses.

Remember, Jesus is to return IN LIKE MANNER(not "exact") as He left. Obviously, that hasn't yet happened.

I pointed out several events in the Olivet Discourse that were fulfilled literally, and you're just guessing that the yet-unfulfilled portions are symbolic. Again, Jesus didn't switch horses in the middle of the stream, going from literal to symbolic. Remember, He began by prophesying the destruction of the temple, which was, of course, literal, & then His disciples asked Him when those thinga would be, & what else was gonna hallen, so He answered them JUST-AS-LITERALLY. No getting by that big ole bear of a FACT that those events haven't happened yet. Jesus even said, "Let the READER understand" even before His words were written down!

Yes, preterism is false eschatology. I PRAY the HOLY SPIRIT will teach you what's literal & what's symbolic. Right now, you're depending upon MEN to tell you.
Christians have been saying "we see prophecy unfolding before our eyes" ever since Israel became a nation again in 1948. This is simply not true, as the Olivet Discourse prophecies are long since fulfilled. Jesus wasn't talking about the READER of the Olivet Discourse narrative, but the READER of Daniel's prophecy. Daniel's prophecies were fulfilled with the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70.

Your prayer was answered long ago when the Holy Spirit revealed how to distinguish symbolic prophecy language from literal language. It's quite easy, if you get past man's interpretations and let the Spirit guide you.
 

Lodic

Well-Known Member
Don't think too much of me ... I fail to crucify the flesh all too often ... but thank you, it's Gal 2:20, I promise.

I really appreciate how civil you are as we discuss our different views. Too many of our brothers and sisters in Christ can get pretty ugly over different viewpoints. My views are just that - my views. My wife has assured me that I can be (and often have been) wrong. Regarding failing to crucify the flesh, guilty as well. BTW, I agree with you regarding the 2020 NASB. I'll stick with my NASB 95 and NKJV.

Thank you for the Daniel 7:20 reference. The reference to Trump was funny. Daniel 7 is entirely a prophetic vision that God gave Daniel, of course. Beginning in verse 15, the angel interprets the vision of the 4 beasts. The ram is the Medo-Persian empire, the goat is Greece (Alexander the Great), and the horns represent 4 of Alexander's generals who came after him. The 4th kingdom (v. 23) is larger in the sense that it is more powerful. This points to the Roman empire.

I forgot to note Daniel also describes his character in chapter 11:37 ... disregards religion of his fathers, and apparently is a homosexual? (no regard for the desire of women) ... or is a "ladies man" (object of women's desire?) I tend to favor the former as the forsaking ... and given what's transpired in the last 40 years with a return to the open perversions of the "Roman Orgys" and worse ... further perverting the things of God with a 6 color rainbow rather than the true 7 color rainbow. (Current Israeli foreign minister Lapid; favors a two-state solution (forsaking the promise of God/Lapid's father's Yahweh ... and is an open homosexual ... keep an eye on this dude)
Interesting thought, and I did not know that information regarding Lapid. I believe the "desire of women" was the Messiah, whom every Jewish woman wished to give birth to. Daniel 11:36-45 possibly points to Herod the Great, who tried to have the infant Jesus killed.

how does Daniel 9:27 mean Jesus is the one who enters into a firm covenant with many when the passage clearly states in the middle of the week he stops the sacrifice when the account of Jesus' fulfilling Zech 9's entry on the donkey, etc is the first of the week and, of course, the crucifixion at the end of the week ... NOT the middle of the week? Meanwhile in a parallel account, John expounds and tells of antichrist entering the Temple, stopping the sacrifice and declaring himself to be God.
Excellent point, Brother. I believe the firm covenant was fulfilled at the Last Supper, and Jesus allowed Himself to be crucified in the middle of the "week" which initiated an end of the old covenant. This didn't happen immediately, but "on the wing of abominations", when the Romans destroyed the Temple. (BTW, I've also read that Titus tried to stop this destruction, but the army wanted the gold. History sure is interesting.)

Regarding Revelation 17, I believe the great harlot was Apostate Israel. This could turn into another discussion all by itself, but I won't go into that right now. One thing for sure - Whether your view is correct, or my view is correct, our "marching orders" remain the same - carry out the Great Commission to make disciples of Christ.
 

Lodic

Well-Known Member
Bad interpertation. It is like arguing the Aposlte Paul wrote that he would see it in 1 Corinthians 15:52, ". . . In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. . . ."
Different context. In 1 Corinthians, this passage clearly indicates all believers will be changed. However, not all believers would see the events described in the Olivet Discourse. Only those who were alive when those events came to pass saw it.
 

robycop3

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
It DID happen.
I have a whole bookshelf full of encyclopediae & other works of history that preve differently.


You need to get off that. Just because it's a realm not of this world, a Spirit covenant that can't be seen with the natural eye or touched with the physical hand and you refuse to accept that doesn't mean Christ's words didn't come true. Let Christ be true and every man a liar.
Jesus never even hinted those will be spiritual events. He was speaking of this world, the same one He & His disciples were then in. And those events have simply NOT yet occurred. Betcha can't prove otherwise! If you could, all the pther preterists would elect you King!
 

robycop3

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Christians have been saying "we see prophecy unfolding before our eyes" ever since Israel became a nation again in 1948.
That's because it's TRUE.


This is simply not true, as the Olivet Discourse prophecies are long since fulfilled.
No, only a few of them are.

Jesus wasn't talking about the READER of the Olivet Discourse narrative, but the READER of Daniel's prophecy. Daniel's prophecies were fulfilled with the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70.
I believe differently, but if one understands Daniel's prophecy, one sees that the AOD he mentioned was fulfilled by Antiochus Epiphanes in the 160s BC. And Jesus was, of course, referring to a similar future event, which didn't occur in the old temple before it was destroyed, & thus is still future.

Your prayer was answered long ago when the Holy Spirit revealed how to distinguish symbolic prophecy language from literal language. It's quite easy, if you get past man's interpretations and let the Spirit guide you.
I don't believe it was the HOLY SPIRIT who guided you into false beliefs. There are many spirits, & not all are good ones. it's very-obvious the beast hasn't yet come, nor has the great trib, and certainly not Jesus' physical, visible, glorious return, which will be seen by ALL. The evidence of reality is all against the pret view.

I suggest you pray for the REAL Holy Spirit to break your habit of reducing clearly-literal Scriptures to "figurative/symbolic" status to make them fit some preterist hooey.
 

Iconoclast

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
**PROOF**, please???????????????????????????
Mt.26:64
Jesus saith unto him, thou hast said nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter you shall see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the Clouds Of Heaven.

Jesus describes His ascension from Dan.7:13,sitting on the right hand of power.
He ascended in Acts1 in the clouds.
Dan7 describes the Heavenly view of it.
They knew that described the Messiah so they proceeded to crucify Him.
When those who pierced Him saw the destruction of Jerusalem in their lifetime.they understood mt.24 was fulfilled just as He said it.Rev.1:7
These are truths that you post against.
 

asterisktom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
While you may very will be correct. The problem is there not being enough information provided.

Not sure what information is not provided. I gave the starting point of the 70 Weeks with both Scriptural backing and historical confirmation.
 

Lodic

Well-Known Member
That's because it's TRUE.
No, only a few of them are.

I believe differently, but if one understands Daniel's prophecy, one sees that the AOD he mentioned was fulfilled by Antiochus Epiphanes in the 160s BC. And Jesus was, of course, referring to a similar future event, which didn't occur in the old temple before it was destroyed, & thus is still future.

I don't believe it was the HOLY SPIRIT who guided you into false beliefs. There are many spirits, & not all are good ones. it's very-obvious the beast hasn't yet come, nor has the great trib, and certainly not Jesus' physical, visible, glorious return, which will be seen by ALL. The evidence of reality is all against the pret view.

I suggest you pray for the REAL Holy Spirit to break your habit of reducing clearly-literal Scriptures to "figurative/symbolic" status to make them fit some preterist hooey.
You say "only a few", I say "all", then you say "only a few", and I say "all" ad infinitum.

While Antiochus IV Epiphanes was a shadow of the AOD, Daniel's prophecy pointed to the actual Abomination of Desolation of AD 70.

Agreed, there are many spirits that deceive many Christians. Unfortunately, many follow man-made doctrines and buy into the idea that prophecies that were fulfilled in AD 70 are still unfulfilled events. This is the same mistake that present day Jews make when they are still looking for the Messiah to come when He came 2,000 years ago. The evidence of reality is supported by the Preterist view.
 

asterisktom

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn

...

How does the full Perterist and the orthodox partial Perterist understand this differently?


To begin with, the phrase is "tribes of the land", not "Earth". This has a specific reference to the land of Judea.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top